FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000721152> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000721152 endingPage "49" @default.
• W2000721152 startingPage "49" @default.
• W2000721152 abstract "Despite many calls for the utilisation of research evidence in health policy-making, it is not widely practised, and little is known about how decision-makers in healthcare organisations actually make decisions. We recruited a purposive sample of Australian healthcare decision-makers to complete a web-based survey. We then took a sub-sample from willing respondents for individual interviews. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded thematically. We found that resource allocation decision-making varied greatly across the Australian healthcare system. Decision-making was highly dependent on the operational context in time, place and purpose, and that research evidence was rarely exploited to its full potential. Decision-making involved a multifaceted interplay of elements in situation of inquiry. All decisions were made by networks or collectives of people; and no instance of individual decision-making was reported. This varied, social and contextual nature of decision-making points to a complexity that is not reflected in systematic evidence-based reviews or evidence-based models for decision-making, and we did not discover an appropriate model to reflect this complexity in the health- related literature. We developed a model of ‘adaptive decision-making’ that has potential to guide robust decision-making in complex situations, and could have some value as an explanatory or theoretical model for teaching and practice. What is known about the topic? The topic is certainly novel and original, relevant and timely for academics and healthcare decision-makers. Despite increasing calls for the use of systematic evidence-based reviews including economic evaluations, the way in which decision-makers arrive at their allocation decisions and how such decisions reflect concern for economic efficiency is often blurred. This topic is an important one for its relevance to the current difficulties in the complex situation of healthcare. What does this paper add? This paper shows that decision-makers acknowledged the integration of economic principles as contextual realities into their decision-making activities, rather than utilising the results of ever-more seemingly ‘technically sound’ economic evaluations, which cannot address the inherent uncertainty attached to complex decision-making activities. We developed a novel adaptive model of decision-making generated by the interplay of multiple behaviours and factors in the situation of inquiry. The model is new and takes into account the complexity of the context in time, place, purpose and administrative location. What are the implications for practitioners? This paper should be of interest to a broad readership including those interested in health economics, public health policy, healthcare delivery, healthcare resource allocation and decision-making. The adaptive decision-making model designed in this study has the potential as a guide or heuristic device for teaching and practice. Healthcare decision-makers need to be prepared for complexity and ambiguity and cannot expect the data to tell them everything they need to know. We expect to see a shift in the literature on healthcare decision-making, not away from evidence-based practice and economic evaluation, but towards contextualising these methods in broader, adaptive models of decision-making." @default.
• W2000721152 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000721152 creator A5005283430 @default.
• W2000721152 creator A5030303067 @default.
• W2000721152 creator A5036062818 @default.
• W2000721152 creator A5090137929 @default.
• W2000721152 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2000721152 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2000721152 title "Adaptive decision-making: how Australian healthcare managers decide" @default.
• W2000721152 cites W1548797871 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W1965944971 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W1968681698 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W1980935881 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2004541993 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2006189363 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2012990676 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2014537695 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2016206076 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2016598980 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2056169012 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2064650943 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2066273350 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2078317480 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2078825492 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2088763003 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2103191901 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2106422035 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2107620258 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2112665591 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2119608181 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2120957296 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2132849863 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2138395813 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2140809481 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2143988373 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2168487223 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2182770769 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W2328749703 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W4251959173 @default.
• W2000721152 cites W4323238629 @default.
• W2000721152 doi "https://doi.org/10.1071/ah10971" @default.
• W2000721152 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22513020" @default.
• W2000721152 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2000721152 type Work @default.
• W2000721152 sameAs 2000721152 @default.
• W2000721152 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2000721152 countsByYear W20007211522012 @default.
• W2000721152 countsByYear W20007211522013 @default.
• W2000721152 countsByYear W20007211522014 @default.
• W2000721152 countsByYear W20007211522015 @default.
• W2000721152 countsByYear W20007211522017 @default.
• W2000721152 countsByYear W20007211522018 @default.
• W2000721152 countsByYear W20007211522019 @default.
• W2000721152 countsByYear W20007211522020 @default.
• W2000721152 countsByYear W20007211522021 @default.
• W2000721152 countsByYear W20007211522023 @default.
• W2000721152 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000721152 hasAuthorship W2000721152A5005283430 @default.
• W2000721152 hasAuthorship W2000721152A5030303067 @default.
• W2000721152 hasAuthorship W2000721152A5036062818 @default.
• W2000721152 hasAuthorship W2000721152A5090137929 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C2778149918 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C151730666 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C15744967 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C160735492 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C162324750 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C17744445 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C185592680 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C198531522 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C199539241 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C2778149918 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C2779343474 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C39549134 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C41008148 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C43617362 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C539667460 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C56739046 @default.
• W2000721152 hasConceptScore W2000721152C86803240 @default.
• W2000721152 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2000721152 hasLocation W20007211521 @default.
• W2000721152 hasLocation W20007211522 @default.
• W2000721152 hasOpenAccess W2000721152 @default.
• W2000721152 hasPrimaryLocation W20007211521 @default.

• next