FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000738834> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000738834 endingPage "197" @default.
• W2000738834 startingPage "177" @default.
• W2000738834 abstract "It has been barely thirty years since the inception of ethnic studies programs at San Francisco State University in 1968 and Berkeley in 1969, yet movements that seek to dismantle the liberationist energies of the 1960s--whether in the form of reinstating traditional curricula or reversing civil rights policies--are well underway. In California, the passage of Proposition 209 repealed the use of racial quotas in college admissions, resulting in an immediate and drastic reduction in the freshmen enrollment of African American and Hispanic American students at California's major universities. Ward Connerly, who spearheaded the so-called California Civil Rights Initiative, has recently suggested sitting in on ethnic studies courses at Berkeley to determine whether they indeed promote racial and ethnic awareness or in fact foment radical separatism among students. (1) Ironically, Connerly's neoconservative meliorism ignores the brief history of ethnic studies programs, which emerged from the anti-war protest to challenge traditional constructions of American history that elided the contributions of ethnic minorities. This reaction against ethnic studies coincides with the emergence of the newest thing in lit crit/cultural studies: whiteness studies. Whiteness studies purports to denaturalize whiteness by incorporating a constructivist perspective and unmasking the ideological parameters of whiteness: to make visible an invisible norm. The best studies within the genre, such as David Roediger's, suggest how the working class in the nineteenth century constructed itself as white in relation to a racial other, emphasizing the constitutive reliance of the mainstream on the marginal. In this view, the whitening of an ethnicized working class occurs through a master-slave dialectic sustained politically by working-class resistance to pro-abolition alliances and through cultural forms such as blackface minstrelsy. (See Roediger, Wages; Lott, Love; and Ignatiev.) Paradoxically, various genealogies locate the inception of whiteness studies in the very period when challenges to a normative whiteness coalesced: second-wave feminism assumed an arguably self-conscious turn when women of color questioned its white, middle-class perspective (see Frankenberg, White Women 2-3); and, to some extent, the advent of whiteness studies can be attributed to ethnic studies traditionally conceived, which distinguishes the experiences of those ethnic groups subject to racialization, emphasizing the power differentials that obtain among diverse ethnicities in a nation of ethnics. It must be stressed, however, that the cultural nationalist ethos of ethnic studies was very much a response to the racialization--and racist treatment--of ethnic groups based on phenotype. But the prominence of whiteness studies at this historical conjuncture raises as many questions as it answers because in some forms it is disturbingly indistinguishable from mainstream studies and can be readily accommodated to a rubric that, by virtue of reclaiming the margin, recenters whiteness as the primary object of study, along with an attendant realignment of institutional power and resources. (2) But whether we identify its emergence in second-wave feminism's self-conscious swerve, or as a reaction formation to exclusionary ethnic programs, whiteness studies becomes a defence of the status quo when it loses its critical self-consciousness, whether conjoined with feminist, queer, or postcolonial discourses. An analysis of whiteness, however, converges in salutary ways with these very discourses--specifically in the context of paradigms of masquerade, mimicry, and the butch-femme couple--in the work of David Henry Hwang, to which I now turn. Celebrated since its premiere on February 10, 1988 at the National Theatre in Washington D.C., David Henry Hwang's M. Butterfly has been a cynosure for cultural debate on race and sexuality; less well known is Hwang's 1994 screenplay Golden Gate, dismissed in most accounts as a commercial and critical failure. …" @default.
• W2000738834 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000738834 creator A5057366552 @default.
• W2000738834 date "2002-03-01" @default.
• W2000738834 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2000738834 title "Projected Bodies in David Henry Hwang's M. Butterfly and Golden Gate" @default.
• W2000738834 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/3250642" @default.
• W2000738834 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2000738834 type Work @default.
• W2000738834 sameAs 2000738834 @default.
• W2000738834 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2000738834 countsByYear W20007388342012 @default.
• W2000738834 countsByYear W20007388342020 @default.
• W2000738834 countsByYear W20007388342022 @default.
• W2000738834 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000738834 hasAuthorship W2000738834A5057366552 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConcept C2778605236 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConcept C2778753569 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConcept C2780028475 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConcept C2992986569 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConceptScore W2000738834C127413603 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConceptScore W2000738834C142362112 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConceptScore W2000738834C147176958 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConceptScore W2000738834C18903297 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConceptScore W2000738834C2778605236 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConceptScore W2000738834C2778753569 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConceptScore W2000738834C2780028475 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConceptScore W2000738834C2992986569 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConceptScore W2000738834C52119013 @default.
• W2000738834 hasConceptScore W2000738834C86803240 @default.
• W2000738834 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2000738834 hasLocation W20007388341 @default.
• W2000738834 hasOpenAccess W2000738834 @default.
• W2000738834 hasPrimaryLocation W20007388341 @default.
• W2000738834 hasRelatedWork W2055435255 @default.
• W2000738834 hasRelatedWork W2164623947 @default.
• W2000738834 hasRelatedWork W2285293166 @default.
• W2000738834 hasRelatedWork W264657425 @default.
• W2000738834 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2000738834 hasRelatedWork W2990267251 @default.
• W2000738834 hasRelatedWork W3167069916 @default.
• W2000738834 hasRelatedWork W4299796121 @default.
• W2000738834 hasRelatedWork W1702806753 @default.
• W2000738834 hasRelatedWork W2595333896 @default.
• W2000738834 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2000738834 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2000738834 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2000738834 magId "2000738834" @default.
• W2000738834 workType "article" @default.