FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000745530> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000745530 endingPage "10" @default.
• W2000745530 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2000745530 abstract "PaperImaging of bladder cancerT B Hall and A D MacVicarT B HallDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UKSearch for more papers by this author and A D MacVicarDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UKSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/img.13.1.130001SectionsPDF/EPUBFull Text ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail About References 1 Olsson CA, deVere R, White RW. Cancer of the bladder. In: Javadapour N, editor. Principles and management of urologic cancer. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1979:337. Google Scholar2 Schmidt JD, Weinstein SH. Pitfalls in clinical staging of bladder tumours. Urol Clin North Am 1976;3:107–27. Google Scholar3 Richie JP, Skinner DG, Kaufman JJ. Carcinoma of the bladder: treatment by radical cystectomy. J Surg Res 1975;18:271–5. Crossref, Google Scholar4 Skinner DB, Tift JP, Kaufman JJ. High‐dose, short‐course preoperative radiation therapy and immediate single stage cystectomy with pelvic node dissection in the management of bladder cancer. J Urol 1982;127:671–4. Google Scholar5 Prout GR. Bladder carcinoma and a TNM system of classification. J Urol 1997;117:583–90. Google Scholar6 Thames Cancer Registry. Cancer in south‐east England 1992. Thames Cancer Registry, 1994. Google Scholar7 Cancer Research Campaign. Bladder Cancer Factsheet. Cancer Research Campaign, 1997. Google Scholar8 Karpman E, Zvara P, Stoppacher R, Jackson TL, Plante MK. Phaeochromocytoma of the urinary bladder: update on new diagnostic modalities pluscase report. Ann Urol (Paris) 2000;34:13–9. Google Scholar9 Umaria N, Olliff JF. MRI appearances of bladder endometriosis. Br J Radiol 2000;73:733–6. Link, Google Scholar10 Wynder EL, Goldsmith R. The epidemiology of bladder cancer—a second look. Cancer 1977;40:1246. Crossref, Google Scholar11 Clavel J, Cordier S, Baccon‐Jibod L, Hemon D. Tobacco and bladder cancer in males: increase risk for inhalers and smokers of black tobacco. Int J Cancer 1989;44:605–10. Crossref, Google Scholar12 Jewett HJ, Strong GH. Infiltrating carcinoma of the bladder. Relation of depth of penetration of the bladder wall to incidence of local extension and metastases. J Urol 1946;55:366–72. Medline, Google Scholar13 Marshall V. The relation of the preoperative estimate to the pathologic demonstration of the extent of vesicle neoplasms. J Urol 1952;68:714–23. Google Scholar14 International Union Against Cancer (UICC). Urinary bladder. In: Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumours (5th edn). New York, NY: Wiley‐Liss, 1997:187–90. Google Scholar15 DeFilippo NP, Fortunato RP, Mellins HZ, Richie JP. Intravenous urography: important adjunct for diagnosis of bladder tumours. Br J Urol 1984;56:502–5. Google Scholar16 Yip SK, Peh WC, Tam PC, Li JH, Lam CH. Role of ultrasonography in screening for urological malignancies in patients presenting with painless haematuria. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1999;28:174–7. Google Scholar17 Spencer J, Lindsell D, Mastorakou I. Ultrasonography compared with intravenous urography in the investigation of adults with haematuria. BMJ1990;301:1074–6. Crossref, Google Scholar18 Corrigan NT, Crooks J, Shand J. Are dedicated bladder films necessary as part of intravenous urography for haematuria? BJU Int 2000;85:806–10. Crossref, Google Scholar19 Servadio C, Hadar H, Nissenkorn I. Angiography in the evaluation of the bladder. Int Surg 1980;65:335–40. Google Scholar20 Thiry AJ, Mathieu J, Brion JP, Struyven J. Contribution of angiography in bladder cancer. Eur Urol 1980;6:139–44. Google Scholar21 Singer D, Itzchak Y, Fischelovitch Y. Ultrasonographic assessment of bladder tumour. II. Clinical staging. J Urol 1981;126:34–6. Medline, Google Scholar22 Fang YC, Chou YH, Hsu CC, Chang T. Staging of bladder cancer by transabdominal real‐time ultrasound. Chung Hua I Hsueh Tsa Chih (Taipei) 1993;52:21–5. Google Scholar23 Boccon‐Gibod L, le Portz B, Godefroy D, Steg A. Suprapubic ultrasonography in the follow‐up of superficial bladder tumors. Eur Urol 1985;11:317–9. Google Scholar24 Denkhaus H, Crone‐Munzebrock W, Huland H. Noninvasive ultrasound in detecting and staging bladder carcinoma. Urol Radiol 1985;7:121–31. Crossref, Google Scholar25 Abu‐Yousef MM, Narayana AS, Franken EA Jr, Brown RC. Urinary bladder tumors studied by cystosonography. Part 1: detection. Radiology 1984;153:223–6. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar26 Dershaw DD, Scher HI. Sonography in evaluation of carcinoma of bladder. Urology 1987;29:454–7. Google Scholar27 Katakoa K, Kaneko S, Kohri K, Akiyama T, Kurita T. Transurethral ultrasonography for bladder tumour staging. Hinyokika Kiyo 1985;31:243–8. Google Scholar28 Grups JW, Gruss A, Frohmuller HG. Evaluation of the T stage of carcinoma of the bladder by transurethral ultrasonography. Urol Int 1989;44:132–4. Crossref, Google Scholar29 Stepanov VN, Perel'man VM, Abdukhakimov AF. Transabdominal and transurethral scanning in the diagnosis of the bladder cancer stage. Urol Nefrol (Mosk) 1991;2:33–7. Google Scholar30 Pavone C, Di Trapani D, Serretta V, Filosto L, Cacciatore M, Caramia G, et al. Transurethral ultrasonography, CT scan, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging and pathological control in staging and follow up of invasive bladder carcinoma. Prog Clin Biol Res 1988;260:251–63. Google Scholar31 Harada K, Igari D, Tanahashi Y, Watanabe H, Saltoh M, Mishina T. Staging of bladder tumors by means of transrectal ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1977;5:388–92. Crossref, Google Scholar32 Watanabe H, Mishina T, Ohe H. Staging of bladder tumors by transrectal ultrasonotomography and U.I. Octoson. Urol Radiol 1983;5:11–6. Crossref, Google Scholar33 Zyb AF, Slessarew WI, Grischin GN, Karjakin OB, Duntschik WN. Value of transrectal and transvaginal ultrasonic tomography using an electronic linear scanner in staging bladder tumors. Radiologe 1987;27:314–20. Google Scholar34 Sager EM, Talle K, Fossa SD, Ous S, Stenwig AE. Contrast‐enhanced computed tomography to show perivesical extension in bladder carcinoma. Acta Radiol 1987;28:307–11. Crossref, Google Scholar35 Havard AC. Technical report: the post‐micturition CT scan as an aid to staging bladder cancer. Clin Radiol 1992;45:201–2. Crossref, Google Scholar36 Price JM, Davidson AJ. Computed tomography in the evaluation of the suspected carcinomatous prostate. Urol Radiol 1979;1:39–42. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar37 Koss JC, Arger PH, Coleman BG, Mulhern CB, Pollack HM, Wein AJ. CT staging of bladder carcinoma. AJR 1981;137:359–62. Crossref, Google Scholar38 Jeffrey RB, Palubinskas AJ, Federle MP. CT evaluation of invasive bladder lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1981;5:22–6. Crossref, Google Scholar39 Hodson NJ, Husband JE, Macdonald JS. The role of computed tomography in the staging of bladder cancer. Clin Radiol 1979;30:389–95. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar40 Vinnicombe SJ, Norman AR, Nicholson V, Husband JE. Normal pelvic lymph nodes: evaluation with CT after bipedal lymphangiography. Radiology 1995;194:349–55. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar41 Lee JKT, Stanley RJ, Sagel SS, McClennan BL. Accuracy of CT in detecting intraabdominal and pelvic lymph node matastases from pelvic cancers. AJR 1978;131:675–9. Crossref, Google Scholar42 Tanimoto A, Yuasa Y, Imai Y, Izutzu M, Hiramatsu K, Tachibana M, et al. Bladder tumour staging: comparison of conventional and Gadolinium‐enhanced dynamic MR imaging and CT. Radiology 1992;185:741–7. Crossref, Google Scholar43 Morgan CL, Calkins RF, Cavalcanti EJ. Computed tomography in the evaluation, staging and therapy of carcinoma of the bladder and prostate. Radiology 1981;140:751–61. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar44 Sager EM, Talle K, Fossa S, Ous S, Stenwig AE. The role of CT in demonstrating perivesical tumor growth in the preoperative staging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Radiology 1983;146:443–6. Crossref, Google Scholar45 Barentz JO, Lemmens JAM, Ruijs SHJ, Boskamp EB, Hendrikx AJM, Karthaus HFM, et al. Carcinoma of the bladder: MR imaging with a double surface coil. AJR 1988;151:107–12. Crossref, Google Scholar46 Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE, Pollack HM, Imai Y, Kressel HY. Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. Radiology 1989;172:570–4. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar47 Barentsz JO, Jager GJ, van Vierzen PB, Witjes JA, Strijk SP, Peters H, et al. Staging urinary bladder cancer after transurethral biopsy: value of fast dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1996;201:185–93. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar48 Kim B, Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Chalpin DB, Carroll PR, Hricak H. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast‐enhanced CT, T1‐, T2‐weighted MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium‐enhanced imaging, and late gadolinium‐enhanced imaging. Radiology 1994;193:239–45. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar49 Koelbel G, Schmiedl U, Griebel J, Hess CF, Kueper K. MR imaging of urinary bladder neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12:98–103. Crossref, Google Scholar50 Bryan PJ, Butler HE, LiPuma JP, Resnick MI, Kursh MI, Kursh ED. CT and MR imaging in staging bladder neoplasms. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1987;11:96–101. Crossref, Google Scholar51 Amendola MA, Glazer GM, Grossman HB, Aisen AM, Francis IR. Staging of bladder carcinoma: MRI–CT–surgical correlation. AJR 1986;146:1179–83. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar52 Dooms GC, Hricak H, Crooks LE, Higgins CB. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lymph nodes: comparison with CT. Radiology 1984;153:719–28. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar53 Fisher MR, Hricak H, Tanagho EA. Urinary bladder MR imaging. Part II. Neoplasm. Radiology 1985;157:471–7. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar54 Buy JN, Moss AA, Guinet C, Ghossain MA, Malbec L, Arrive L, et al. MR staging of bladder carcinoma: correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 1988;169:695–700. Crossref, Google Scholar55 McCulloch CJ. A comparison of clinical and MR staging of bladder carcinoma. Clin Radiol 1995;50:878–9. Crossref, Google Scholar56 Dershaw DD, Scher HI. Serial transabdominal sonography of bladder cancer. AJR 1988;150:1055–9. Crossref, Google Scholar57 Ebner F, Kressel HY, Mintz MC, Carlson JA, Cohen EK, Schiebler M, et al. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the female pelvis: differentiation with MRI at 1.5T. Radiology 1988;166:333–40. Crossref Medline ISI, Google Scholar58 Heaney MD, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Tekchandani A, Montie JE. Orthotopic neobladder reconstruction: findings on excretory urography and CT. AJR 1999;172:1213–20. Crossref, Google Scholar59 Hricak H. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the irradiated female pelvis. Semin Roentgenol 1994;29:70–80. Crossref, Google Scholar60 Sugimura K, Carrington BM, Quivey JM, Hricak H. Postirradiation changes in the pelvis: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1990;175:805–13. Crossref, Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byImaging of bladder cancer28 January 2014 | Imaging, Vol. 20, No. 2 Volume 13, Issue 1April 2001Pages: 1vi-69 © The British Institute of Radiology History Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF" @default.
• W2000745530 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000745530 creator A5024613579 @default.
• W2000745530 creator A5064724099 @default.
• W2000745530 date "2001-04-01" @default.
• W2000745530 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2000745530 title "Imaging of bladder cancer" @default.
• W2000745530 cites W1599512359 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W1965363661 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W1966566437 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W1966928410 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W1974151056 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W1980820931 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W1983735615 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W1984287992 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W1987475783 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W1994800612 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W1997657135 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2006712725 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2014985859 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2016729740 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2028211588 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2028246999 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2028931419 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2030243840 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2036436731 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2038064640 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2039631468 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2043021889 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2045868842 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2046855942 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2054175960 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2084260531 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2084266432 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2086237018 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2091567003 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2098045505 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2126183639 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2128215948 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2130774718 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2134020114 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2166566908 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2169245328 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2170029532 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2403241238 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2412417609 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2413671875 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2416439358 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2418328021 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2441756799 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W2888986801 @default.
• W2000745530 cites W4255361312 @default.
• W2000745530 doi "https://doi.org/10.1259/img.13.1.130001" @default.
• W2000745530 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2000745530 type Work @default.
• W2000745530 sameAs 2000745530 @default.
• W2000745530 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2000745530 countsByYear W20007455302012 @default.
• W2000745530 countsByYear W20007455302013 @default.
• W2000745530 countsByYear W20007455302015 @default.
• W2000745530 countsByYear W20007455302016 @default.
• W2000745530 countsByYear W20007455302017 @default.
• W2000745530 countsByYear W20007455302018 @default.
• W2000745530 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000745530 hasAuthorship W2000745530A5024613579 @default.
• W2000745530 hasAuthorship W2000745530A5064724099 @default.
• W2000745530 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2000745530 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2000745530 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2000745530 hasConcept C2780352672 @default.
• W2000745530 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2000745530 hasConceptScore W2000745530C121608353 @default.
• W2000745530 hasConceptScore W2000745530C126322002 @default.
• W2000745530 hasConceptScore W2000745530C126838900 @default.
• W2000745530 hasConceptScore W2000745530C2780352672 @default.
• W2000745530 hasConceptScore W2000745530C71924100 @default.
• W2000745530 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2000745530 hasLocation W20007455301 @default.
• W2000745530 hasOpenAccess W2000745530 @default.
• W2000745530 hasPrimaryLocation W20007455301 @default.
• W2000745530 hasRelatedWork W141524600 @default.
• W2000745530 hasRelatedWork W1841185769 @default.
• W2000745530 hasRelatedWork W1979321249 @default.
• W2000745530 hasRelatedWork W2011500441 @default.
• W2000745530 hasRelatedWork W2085905477 @default.
• W2000745530 hasRelatedWork W2144610094 @default.
• W2000745530 hasRelatedWork W2155887765 @default.
• W2000745530 hasRelatedWork W2415761310 @default.
• W2000745530 hasRelatedWork W2474195589 @default.
• W2000745530 hasRelatedWork W2118673085 @default.
• W2000745530 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2000745530 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2000745530 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2000745530 magId "2000745530" @default.
• W2000745530 workType "article" @default.