FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000769656> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000769656 endingPage "849" @default.
• W2000769656 startingPage "843" @default.
• W2000769656 abstract "Background Insufflation of the lumen is required for visualization during GI endoscopy. Carbon dioxide (CO2) has been proposed as an alternative to room air for insufflation. Objectives To assess the safety and efficacy of CO2 insufflation for endoscopy. Design Systematic review that focuses on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT). Methods Two investigators independently searched MEDLINE from 1950 to February 13, 2008, to identify all articles that reported the use of CO2 in a GI endoscopy application. Bibliographies of relevant articles were also hand searched to identify other pertinent reports. Data from RCTs, as well as from nonrandomized studies, were extracted. Results Nine RCTs were identified that compared CO2 and air insufflation for GI endoscopy. Fifteen other nonrandomized studies or reports were also reviewed. In the 8 RCTs in which postprocedural pain was assessed, pain was lower in the CO2 insufflation group compared with the air group. Two RCTs found decreased flatus in the CO2 group compared with the air group, and 3 RCTs showed there was decreased bowel distention on abdominal radiography in the CO2 group compared with the air group. Also, in all 9 RCTs and 6 additional studies in which safety was assessed, there was no CO2 retention and no adverse pulmonary events related to CO2 insufflation. Limitations Because of study heterogeneity, meta-analytic techniques could not be used. Conclusions Consistent RCT evidence indicates that CO2 insufflation is associated with decreased postprocedural pain, flatus, and bowel distention. CO2 insufflation also appears to be safe in patients without severe underlying pulmonary disease. Insufflation of the lumen is required for visualization during GI endoscopy. Carbon dioxide (CO2) has been proposed as an alternative to room air for insufflation. To assess the safety and efficacy of CO2 insufflation for endoscopy. Systematic review that focuses on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT). Two investigators independently searched MEDLINE from 1950 to February 13, 2008, to identify all articles that reported the use of CO2 in a GI endoscopy application. Bibliographies of relevant articles were also hand searched to identify other pertinent reports. Data from RCTs, as well as from nonrandomized studies, were extracted. Nine RCTs were identified that compared CO2 and air insufflation for GI endoscopy. Fifteen other nonrandomized studies or reports were also reviewed. In the 8 RCTs in which postprocedural pain was assessed, pain was lower in the CO2 insufflation group compared with the air group. Two RCTs found decreased flatus in the CO2 group compared with the air group, and 3 RCTs showed there was decreased bowel distention on abdominal radiography in the CO2 group compared with the air group. Also, in all 9 RCTs and 6 additional studies in which safety was assessed, there was no CO2 retention and no adverse pulmonary events related to CO2 insufflation. Because of study heterogeneity, meta-analytic techniques could not be used. Consistent RCT evidence indicates that CO2 insufflation is associated with decreased postprocedural pain, flatus, and bowel distention. CO2 insufflation also appears to be safe in patients without severe underlying pulmonary disease." @default.
• W2000769656 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000769656 creator A5005139471 @default.
• W2000769656 creator A5012642973 @default.
• W2000769656 creator A5032460077 @default.
• W2000769656 creator A5043231740 @default.
• W2000769656 date "2009-04-01" @default.
• W2000769656 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2000769656 title "The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review" @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1499538453 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1536052273 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1964197773 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1976107584 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1976256336 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1978868802 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1979423827 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1984967960 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1990382580 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1991672415 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1995948513 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W1999221287 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2001229843 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2004018353 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2004420818 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2005019261 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2007654599 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2012124337 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2031868803 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2049014398 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2057290126 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2063334766 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2069597477 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2106037834 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2108953655 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2123788090 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2126286042 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2141618863 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2152240392 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2159247251 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2163352040 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W2460643101 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W3022703308 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W36997790 @default.
• W2000769656 cites W4300640955 @default.
• W2000769656 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.067" @default.
• W2000769656 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19152906" @default.
• W2000769656 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2000769656 type Work @default.
• W2000769656 sameAs 2000769656 @default.
• W2000769656 citedByCount "142" @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562012 @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562013 @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562014 @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562015 @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562016 @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562017 @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562018 @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562019 @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562020 @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562021 @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562022 @default.
• W2000769656 countsByYear W20007696562023 @default.
• W2000769656 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000769656 hasAuthorship W2000769656A5005139471 @default.
• W2000769656 hasAuthorship W2000769656A5012642973 @default.
• W2000769656 hasAuthorship W2000769656A5032460077 @default.
• W2000769656 hasAuthorship W2000769656A5043231740 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConcept C2776892627 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConcept C2780955771 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConceptScore W2000769656C126322002 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConceptScore W2000769656C141071460 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConceptScore W2000769656C168563851 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConceptScore W2000769656C197934379 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConceptScore W2000769656C2776892627 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConceptScore W2000769656C2778451229 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConceptScore W2000769656C2780955771 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConceptScore W2000769656C42219234 @default.
• W2000769656 hasConceptScore W2000769656C71924100 @default.
• W2000769656 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2000769656 hasLocation W20007696561 @default.
• W2000769656 hasLocation W20007696562 @default.
• W2000769656 hasOpenAccess W2000769656 @default.
• W2000769656 hasPrimaryLocation W20007696561 @default.
• W2000769656 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W2000769656 hasRelatedWork W2003717794 @default.
• W2000769656 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2000769656 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2000769656 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2000769656 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2000769656 hasRelatedWork W3159358638 @default.
• W2000769656 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.

• next