FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000776865> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000776865 endingPage "e576" @default.
• W2000776865 startingPage "e571" @default.
• W2000776865 abstract "Purpose Workload level and sources of stressors have been implicated as sources of error in multiple settings. We assessed workload levels and sources of stressors among radiation oncology professionals. Furthermore, we explored the potential association between workload and the frequency of reported radiotherapy incidents by the World Health Organization (WHO). Methods and Materials Data collection was aimed at various tasks performed by 21 study participants from different radiation oncology professional subgroups (simulation therapists, radiation therapists, physicists, dosimetrists, and physicians). Workload was assessed using National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task-Load Index (NASA TLX). Sources of stressors were quantified using observational methods and segregated using a standard taxonomy. Comparisons between professional subgroups and tasks were made using analysis of variance ANOVA, multivariate ANOVA, and Duncan test. An association between workload levels (NASA TLX) and the frequency of radiotherapy incidents (WHO incidents) was explored (Pearson correlation test). Results A total of 173 workload assessments were obtained. Overall, simulation therapists had relatively low workloads (NASA TLX range, 30-36), and physicists had relatively high workloads (NASA TLX range, 51-63). NASA TLX scores for physicians, radiation therapists, and dosimetrists ranged from 40-52. There was marked intertask/professional subgroup variation (P<.0001). Mental demand (P<.001), physical demand (P=.001), and effort (P=.006) significantly differed among professional subgroups. Typically, there were 3-5 stressors per cycle of analyzed tasks with the following distribution: interruptions (41.4%), time factors (17%), technical factors (13.6%), teamwork issues (11.6%), patient factors (9.0%), and environmental factors (7.4%). A positive association between workload and frequency of reported radiotherapy incidents by the WHO was found (r = 0.87, P value=.045). Conclusions Workload level and sources of stressors vary among professional subgroups. Understanding the factors that influence these findings can guide adjustments to the workflow procedures, physical layout, and/or communication protocols to enhance safety. Additional evaluations are needed in order to better understand if these findings are systemic. Workload level and sources of stressors have been implicated as sources of error in multiple settings. We assessed workload levels and sources of stressors among radiation oncology professionals. Furthermore, we explored the potential association between workload and the frequency of reported radiotherapy incidents by the World Health Organization (WHO). Data collection was aimed at various tasks performed by 21 study participants from different radiation oncology professional subgroups (simulation therapists, radiation therapists, physicists, dosimetrists, and physicians). Workload was assessed using National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task-Load Index (NASA TLX). Sources of stressors were quantified using observational methods and segregated using a standard taxonomy. Comparisons between professional subgroups and tasks were made using analysis of variance ANOVA, multivariate ANOVA, and Duncan test. An association between workload levels (NASA TLX) and the frequency of radiotherapy incidents (WHO incidents) was explored (Pearson correlation test). A total of 173 workload assessments were obtained. Overall, simulation therapists had relatively low workloads (NASA TLX range, 30-36), and physicists had relatively high workloads (NASA TLX range, 51-63). NASA TLX scores for physicians, radiation therapists, and dosimetrists ranged from 40-52. There was marked intertask/professional subgroup variation (P<.0001). Mental demand (P<.001), physical demand (P=.001), and effort (P=.006) significantly differed among professional subgroups. Typically, there were 3-5 stressors per cycle of analyzed tasks with the following distribution: interruptions (41.4%), time factors (17%), technical factors (13.6%), teamwork issues (11.6%), patient factors (9.0%), and environmental factors (7.4%). A positive association between workload and frequency of reported radiotherapy incidents by the WHO was found (r = 0.87, P value=.045). Workload level and sources of stressors vary among professional subgroups. Understanding the factors that influence these findings can guide adjustments to the workflow procedures, physical layout, and/or communication protocols to enhance safety. Additional evaluations are needed in order to better understand if these findings are systemic." @default.
• W2000776865 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000776865 creator A5001515511 @default.
• W2000776865 creator A5002474048 @default.
• W2000776865 creator A5006040147 @default.
• W2000776865 creator A5021238060 @default.
• W2000776865 creator A5034111587 @default.
• W2000776865 creator A5035292867 @default.
• W2000776865 creator A5055469390 @default.
• W2000776865 creator A5061274866 @default.
• W2000776865 creator A5077622006 @default.
• W2000776865 creator A5085651347 @default.
• W2000776865 creator A5088361906 @default.
• W2000776865 date "2012-08-01" @default.
• W2000776865 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2000776865 title "Quantitative Assessment of Workload and Stressors in Clinical Radiation Oncology" @default.
• W2000776865 cites W2027101304 @default.
• W2000776865 cites W2041526872 @default.
• W2000776865 cites W2043157082 @default.
• W2000776865 cites W2048614932 @default.
• W2000776865 cites W2054761822 @default.
• W2000776865 cites W2079651431 @default.
• W2000776865 cites W2080928771 @default.
• W2000776865 cites W2093014294 @default.
• W2000776865 cites W2093974991 @default.
• W2000776865 cites W2166242430 @default.
• W2000776865 cites W2287468834 @default.
• W2000776865 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.063" @default.
• W2000776865 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22503527" @default.
• W2000776865 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2000776865 type Work @default.
• W2000776865 sameAs 2000776865 @default.
• W2000776865 citedByCount "69" @default.
• W2000776865 countsByYear W20007768652013 @default.
• W2000776865 countsByYear W20007768652014 @default.
• W2000776865 countsByYear W20007768652015 @default.
• W2000776865 countsByYear W20007768652016 @default.
• W2000776865 countsByYear W20007768652017 @default.
• W2000776865 countsByYear W20007768652018 @default.
• W2000776865 countsByYear W20007768652019 @default.
• W2000776865 countsByYear W20007768652020 @default.
• W2000776865 countsByYear W20007768652021 @default.
• W2000776865 countsByYear W20007768652022 @default.
• W2000776865 countsByYear W20007768652023 @default.
• W2000776865 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000776865 hasAuthorship W2000776865A5001515511 @default.
• W2000776865 hasAuthorship W2000776865A5002474048 @default.
• W2000776865 hasAuthorship W2000776865A5006040147 @default.
• W2000776865 hasAuthorship W2000776865A5021238060 @default.
• W2000776865 hasAuthorship W2000776865A5034111587 @default.
• W2000776865 hasAuthorship W2000776865A5035292867 @default.
• W2000776865 hasAuthorship W2000776865A5055469390 @default.
• W2000776865 hasAuthorship W2000776865A5061274866 @default.
• W2000776865 hasAuthorship W2000776865A5077622006 @default.
• W2000776865 hasAuthorship W2000776865A5085651347 @default.
• W2000776865 hasAuthorship W2000776865A5088361906 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C111226992 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C125370674 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C2778476105 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C2909208188 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C2992520072 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C38180746 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C111226992 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C111919701 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C125370674 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C126322002 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C17744445 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C19527891 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C199539241 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C23131810 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C2778476105 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C2909208188 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C2992520072 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C38180746 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C41008148 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C509974204 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C70410870 @default.
• W2000776865 hasConceptScore W2000776865C71924100 @default.
• W2000776865 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2000776865 hasLocation W20007768651 @default.
• W2000776865 hasLocation W20007768652 @default.
• W2000776865 hasOpenAccess W2000776865 @default.
• W2000776865 hasPrimaryLocation W20007768651 @default.
• W2000776865 hasRelatedWork W1995615697 @default.
• W2000776865 hasRelatedWork W2000776865 @default.
• W2000776865 hasRelatedWork W2017819540 @default.
• W2000776865 hasRelatedWork W2018151033 @default.
• W2000776865 hasRelatedWork W2029932847 @default.

• next