Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000831392> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2000831392 endingPage "h1088" @default.
- W2000831392 startingPage "h1088" @default.
- W2000831392 abstract "<b>Objective</b> To establish the extent to which systematic reviews and meta-analyses of individual participant data (IPD) are being used to inform the recommendations included in published clinical guidelines. <b>Design</b> Descriptive study. <b>Setting</b> Database maintained by the Cochrane IPD Meta-analysis Methods Group, supplemented by records of published IPD meta-analyses held in a separate database. <b>Population</b> A test sample of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials that included a meta-analysis of IPD, and a separate sample of clinical guidelines, matched to the IPD meta-analyses according to medical condition, interventions, populations, and dates of publication. <b>Data extraction</b> Descriptive information on each guideline was extracted along with evidence showing use or critical appraisal, or both, of the IPD meta-analysis within the guideline; recommendations based directly on its findings and the use of other systematic reviews in the guideline. <b>Results</b> Based on 33 IPD meta-analyses and 177 eligible, matched clinical guidelines there was evidence that IPD meta-analyses were being under-utilised. Only 66 guidelines (37%) cited a matched IPD meta-analysis. Around a third of these (n=22, 34%) had critically appraised the IPD meta-analysis. Recommendations based directly on the matched IPD meta-analyses were identified for only 18 of the 66 guidelines (27%). For the guidelines that did not cite a matched IPD meta-analysis (n=111, 63%), search dates had preceded the publication of the IPD meta-analysis in 23 cases (21%); however, for the remainder, there was no obvious reasons why the IPD meta-analysis had not been cited. <b>Conclusions</b> Our results indicate that systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on IPD are being under-utilised. Guideline developers should routinely seek good quality and up to date IPD meta-analyses to inform guidelines. Increased use of IPD meta-analyses could lead to improved guidelines ensuring that routine patient care is based on the most reliable evidence available." @default.
- W2000831392 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2000831392 creator A5030250235 @default.
- W2000831392 creator A5045701481 @default.
- W2000831392 creator A5053996737 @default.
- W2000831392 creator A5082927689 @default.
- W2000831392 creator A5090669536 @default.
- W2000831392 creator A5091690444 @default.
- W2000831392 date "2015-03-06" @default.
- W2000831392 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
- W2000831392 title "Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data in clinical practice guidelines: descriptive study" @default.
- W2000831392 cites W114929610 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W1520193620 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W1528866316 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W1590137713 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W1598602811 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W1740332796 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W1743072581 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W1906951632 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W1932972313 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W1944505717 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W1964172790 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W197329508 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2002062153 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2002216387 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2015473392 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2020362859 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2021970054 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2030120096 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2046391772 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2051481652 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2051976691 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2053397829 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2057021751 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2059182390 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2070591275 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2077033046 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2080994524 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2081073380 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2089257078 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2098923148 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2099116146 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2100089051 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2104675861 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2104701073 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2110884234 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2112003434 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2113552278 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2115803038 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2117693102 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2124922811 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2134297765 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2137670391 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2137745476 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2138363439 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2139992285 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2142434343 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2145191236 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2150683078 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2153065589 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2154122152 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2158379591 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2164089346 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2165980650 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2279875322 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2480089904 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2531964288 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2598936606 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2625768146 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2626223149 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W2724959245 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W3152459266 @default.
- W2000831392 cites W93604404 @default.
- W2000831392 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1088" @default.
- W2000831392 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4353308" @default.
- W2000831392 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25747860" @default.
- W2000831392 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2000831392 type Work @default.
- W2000831392 sameAs 2000831392 @default.
- W2000831392 citedByCount "46" @default.
- W2000831392 countsByYear W20008313922015 @default.
- W2000831392 countsByYear W20008313922016 @default.
- W2000831392 countsByYear W20008313922017 @default.
- W2000831392 countsByYear W20008313922018 @default.
- W2000831392 countsByYear W20008313922019 @default.
- W2000831392 countsByYear W20008313922020 @default.
- W2000831392 countsByYear W20008313922021 @default.
- W2000831392 countsByYear W20008313922022 @default.
- W2000831392 countsByYear W20008313922023 @default.
- W2000831392 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2000831392 hasAuthorship W2000831392A5030250235 @default.
- W2000831392 hasAuthorship W2000831392A5045701481 @default.
- W2000831392 hasAuthorship W2000831392A5053996737 @default.
- W2000831392 hasAuthorship W2000831392A5082927689 @default.
- W2000831392 hasAuthorship W2000831392A5090669536 @default.
- W2000831392 hasAuthorship W2000831392A5091690444 @default.
- W2000831392 hasBestOaLocation W20008313921 @default.
- W2000831392 hasConcept C105795698 @default.