Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000863251> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 items per page.
- W2000863251 endingPage "186" @default.
- W2000863251 startingPage "170" @default.
- W2000863251 abstract "Recent debate over transubstantiation (especially Jean‐Luc Marion's defence of it) has concentrated either on transubstantiation as a kind of embarrassment in consequence of modern physics, or on the extent to which it is both a doctrine elaborated in the light of metaphysics and recoverable in consequence of metaphysics having been overcome. In this sense the tension between Aquinas' apparently metaphysical formulation of the doctrine and the less overtly metaphysical formula adopted by the Council of Trent (in its refusal to speak of ‘accidents’) has indicated a way of ‘rescuing’ or ‘recovering’ the doctrine. This article argues that such a recovery is a false trail. Pope Paul VI was right to be wary of relativising the Eucharistic event to the believing community in any doctrine of transignification. Alternatively, attempts like Chauvet's and Macquarrie's to restate Eucharistic event in terms of Heidegger's Geviert presuppose Heidegger has succeeded in destroying the metaphysics of presence, so that they can use the fruits of his researches. What is actually at issue in thinking through transubstantiation is how the doctrine relates to conceptions of the physical: Aristotelian, what comes to be Newtonian, or postmodern conceptions which appear to eschew physics altogether. Heidegger's contribution to the debate would better point to how knowing anything means being included in and (self‐) disclosed by what I know. A re‐investigation of transubstantiation might therefore take into account the extraordinary reappearance of the term ‘transubstantiation’ in current non‐theological investigations of performativity (especially in the work of Judith Butler). Here transubstantiation would include not the maximal meaning of bread and wine as signs constituted in das Geviert , ‘after’ substance has been critiqued, but their minimality, in enacting a change in (our) substance (self‐realising). This would confirm the divinising meaning of the Eucharistic event, which stresses how we are caught up into the divine. Thus, whereas in transignification the Eucharistic event occurs in consequence of the will of the community of believers, in transubstantiation it is the enactment of the community as community that is at issue, an enactment in consequence of no act of will of its own. In terms of the postmodern and non‐theological appropriation of the word transubstantiation, this means that I who participate in the Eucharistic am re‐ordered, or re‐materialised, or ‘trans‐substantiated’ in the Eucharistic event." @default.
- W2000863251 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2000863251 creator A5035788414 @default.
- W2000863251 date "2000-04-01" @default.
- W2000863251 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2000863251 title "After Heidegger: Transubstantiation" @default.
- W2000863251 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2265.00129" @default.
- W2000863251 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W2000863251 type Work @default.
- W2000863251 sameAs 2000863251 @default.
- W2000863251 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W2000863251 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2000863251 hasAuthorship W2000863251A5035788414 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConcept C182744844 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConcept C2776716606 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConcept C43242481 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConceptScore W2000863251C111472728 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConceptScore W2000863251C138885662 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConceptScore W2000863251C15744967 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConceptScore W2000863251C182744844 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConceptScore W2000863251C27206212 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConceptScore W2000863251C2776211767 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConceptScore W2000863251C2776716606 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConceptScore W2000863251C43242481 @default.
- W2000863251 hasConceptScore W2000863251C77805123 @default.
- W2000863251 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2000863251 hasLocation W20008632511 @default.
- W2000863251 hasOpenAccess W2000863251 @default.
- W2000863251 hasPrimaryLocation W20008632511 @default.
- W2000863251 hasRelatedWork W1770944026 @default.
- W2000863251 hasRelatedWork W1994461726 @default.
- W2000863251 hasRelatedWork W2000863251 @default.
- W2000863251 hasRelatedWork W2090457670 @default.
- W2000863251 hasRelatedWork W2128346994 @default.
- W2000863251 hasRelatedWork W2331770597 @default.
- W2000863251 hasRelatedWork W2346914283 @default.
- W2000863251 hasRelatedWork W2954390831 @default.
- W2000863251 hasRelatedWork W3209062011 @default.
- W2000863251 hasRelatedWork W4248431239 @default.
- W2000863251 hasVolume "41" @default.
- W2000863251 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2000863251 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2000863251 magId "2000863251" @default.
- W2000863251 workType "article" @default.