FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000892652> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000892652 endingPage "282" @default.
• W2000892652 startingPage "247" @default.
• W2000892652 abstract "The Boy Bishop and the “Uncanonized Saint” St. Louis of Anjou and Peter of John Olivi as Models of Franciscan Spirituality in the Fourteenth Century1 Holly J. Grieco (bio) On August 19, 1297, a young man of royal heritage died in the household of the Count of Provence and King of Naples at Brignoles, a short distance from Marseille. The young man was Louis of Anjou, a Franciscan friar and Bishop of Toulouse, who had renounced his inheritance and claim to the Kingdom of Naples to pursue a religious vocation. Only twenty-three years old when he died, Louis nevertheless had long been inspired by Franciscan spirituality, and less than eight months before had realized his dream of professing vows within the Order of Friars Minor at the same time that he submitted to consecration as Bishop of Toulouse. In March of the following year, Peter of John Olivi, a native son of Languedoc, passed from this world at Narbonne. Olivi, a Franciscan for almost forty years, had lived a full life studying at Paris; teaching at Montpellier, Santa Croce, and Narbonne; and serving his order even as he raised questions [End Page 247] regarding its direction at the end of the thirteenth century. Olivi was about fifty years old when he died. Active cults quickly developed at Louis’s tomb at Marseille and Olivi’s tomb at Narbonne. Louis of Anjou drew pilgrims from Provence, especially from the areas surrounding Marseille and Aix, whereas Olivi’s popularity lay primarily within Languedoc, in the region surrounding Béziers, Narbonne, and Carcassonne. Canonization proceedings began for one of these men—Louis of Anjou—in 1307, and Pope John XXII eventually canonized him in 1317. The other, Peter of John Olivi, though the object of fierce local devotion, never received official sanction, and the ecclesiastical hierarchy (as well as his own order) repeatedly condemned his writings and prosecuted his followers for heresy. Indeed, in 1318, Olivi’s remains disappeared from their tomb in the Franciscan church at Narbonne, and rumors suggested that Olivi’s bones had been exhumed and burned, the official treatment of a posthumously convicted heretic. During the lifetimes of Louis of Anjou and Peter of John Olivi, the Franciscan Order faced increasing division within its own ranks. Following their deaths, these rifts only became more bitter and pronounced in the early fourteenth century as the papacy became more active in putting an end to the schism within the Franciscan Order. These divisions pitted Franciscans against themselves as they struggled to understand and interpret the legacy of their founder, Francis of Assisi, at a moment in the Order’s history that was substantially different from the circumstances of its origins. On one side of this split were the so-called Spiritual Franciscans, dedicated to a radically conservative interpretation of Francis’s rule. On the other side of the divide, members of the community believed in an interpretation of the rule that responded to the changing needs of the order and its position in society.2 Even with a split into two main factions, however, [End Page 248] each group was far from unified, and many shades of interpretation existed within both of them. This paper looks at the remembered figures of Louis of Anjou and Peter of John Olivi as models of two competing ideals of Franciscan sanctity. Only a short number of years after their deaths, a kind of historical distortion occurred that magnified the differences between these two men, exaggerating their relationship to each other, and thus downplaying any sympathies they might have held mutually. Looking at Olivi and Louis of Anjou together thus provides a window onto a contested moment in Franciscan history. These two figures allow us to approach the subtleties of debate over the shape of Franciscan life and spirituality in the late thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries. At a moment of intense division within the Franciscan Order, Pope John XXII promoted Louis of Anjou as an orthodox model of Franciscan sanctity – one that privileged humility and compassion over poverty, and obedience to the Church hierarchy over obedience to the Rule – at the same time that he opposed and sought to destroy a model..." @default.
• W2000892652 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000892652 creator A5043289618 @default.
• W2000892652 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2000892652 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2000892652 title "The Boy Bishop and the “Uncanonized Saint” St. Louis of Anjou and Peter of John Olivi as Models of Franciscan Spirituality in the Fourteenth Century" @default.
• W2000892652 cites W1529125478 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W1543752201 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W1562307265 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W1585756325 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W1972196063 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W1987776260 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W1999972737 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W2030715745 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W2033759262 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W2046815237 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W2058255145 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W2331089191 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W573404180 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W586947495 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W588194123 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W600189275 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W611298913 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W615376134 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W651178423 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W68175303 @default.
• W2000892652 cites W1537939421 @default.
• W2000892652 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/frc.2012.0033" @default.
• W2000892652 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2000892652 type Work @default.
• W2000892652 sameAs 2000892652 @default.
• W2000892652 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2000892652 countsByYear W20008926522012 @default.
• W2000892652 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000892652 hasAuthorship W2000892652A5043289618 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConcept C2780415144 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConcept C514793146 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConcept C95124753 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConceptScore W2000892652C138885662 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConceptScore W2000892652C142362112 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConceptScore W2000892652C142724271 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConceptScore W2000892652C204787440 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConceptScore W2000892652C2780415144 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConceptScore W2000892652C514793146 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConceptScore W2000892652C52119013 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConceptScore W2000892652C71924100 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConceptScore W2000892652C95124753 @default.
• W2000892652 hasConceptScore W2000892652C95457728 @default.
• W2000892652 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2000892652 hasLocation W20008926521 @default.
• W2000892652 hasOpenAccess W2000892652 @default.
• W2000892652 hasPrimaryLocation W20008926521 @default.
• W2000892652 hasRelatedWork W146492141 @default.
• W2000892652 hasRelatedWork W1487404372 @default.
• W2000892652 hasRelatedWork W2269239448 @default.
• W2000892652 hasRelatedWork W2320612644 @default.
• W2000892652 hasRelatedWork W2786852033 @default.
• W2000892652 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2000892652 hasRelatedWork W2900992635 @default.
• W2000892652 hasRelatedWork W2993357794 @default.
• W2000892652 hasRelatedWork W3004776546 @default.
• W2000892652 hasRelatedWork W3132982636 @default.
• W2000892652 hasVolume "70" @default.
• W2000892652 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2000892652 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2000892652 magId "2000892652" @default.
• W2000892652 workType "article" @default.