FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000903322> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000903322 endingPage "750" @default.
• W2000903322 startingPage "733" @default.
• W2000903322 abstract "A rapid process of water reform in Australia has seen governments rely heavily on ‘expert’ or ‘scientific’ panel advice for river condition and environmental flow assessments. These multi-disciplinary teams of scientists have enabled a quick and relatively inexpensive injection of science into what is often a data-poor decision process. However, expert panels suffer from several important drawbacks including a lack of transparency and repeatability, and unquantified uncertainty. In the case of the Snowy Mountains hydro-electric scheme, a government initiative to corporatize the government-owned authority led to the establishment of the Snowy Water Inquiry (SWI) that was required by law to propose and evaluate (within a six month period) a range of options for future river regulation, diversion and environmental flows. A Scientific Reference Panel (SRP) was therefore established to assess current (1998) river condition and to assess the likely environments benefits of a range of environmental flow options. The SRP attempted to overcome a number of the typical shortcomings of the expert panel approach by (i) integrating available data with expert opinion in its assessments, and (ii) developing a composite River Condition Index (RCI) underpinned by a conceptual framework that links habitat and biotic condition and comprises several sub-indices that translate qualitative assessments (relative to a pre-disturbance reference condition) into numeric values in a transparent and repeatable manner. The SRP estimated the level of uncertainty associated with its various assessments, and used these to quantify uncertainty estimates on RCI values. In this paper the RCI is described and its use is illustrated through presentation of the assessments of current (1998) river condition and the associated uncertainty analyses that were made for the rivers in the Snowy Mountains area. The results suggest that in spite of high levels of uncertainty associated with individual assessments, the SRP was able to demonstrate significant difference in current condition between rivers, and in likely future condition between different environmental flow scenarios. Although further investigations and lengthy negotiations occurred subsequent to the SWI to achieve corporatization, the environmental assessments made in the SWI provided the most comprehensive source of information available to governments and the community regarding the likely environmental outcomes of the proposed changes. Subsequent to the SWI the scenario-based approach to environmental flow assessment has become increasingly common internationally, and major Australian river condition assessments have adopted a similar conceptual framework to the RCI. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd." @default.
• W2000903322 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000903322 creator A5008212369 @default.
• W2000903322 creator A5036098760 @default.
• W2000903322 creator A5042227937 @default.
• W2000903322 creator A5045235359 @default.
• W2000903322 creator A5046980855 @default.
• W2000903322 creator A5069894068 @default.
• W2000903322 creator A5080341193 @default.
• W2000903322 creator A5080805949 @default.
• W2000903322 creator A5089770272 @default.
• W2000903322 date "2004-10-14" @default.
• W2000903322 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2000903322 title "Improving Expert Panel Assessments through the use of a Composite River Condition Index?the case of the rivers affected by the Snowy Mountains hydro-electric scheme, Australia" @default.
• W2000903322 cites W1517978001 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W162710975 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W1974520149 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W1974663497 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W1989978633 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W2014800829 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W2028599725 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W2057221474 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W2078271249 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W2079307233 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W2099706469 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W2155177039 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W2166885747 @default.
• W2000903322 cites W2253767535 @default.
• W2000903322 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.772" @default.
• W2000903322 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2000903322 type Work @default.
• W2000903322 sameAs 2000903322 @default.
• W2000903322 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2000903322 countsByYear W20009033222017 @default.
• W2000903322 countsByYear W20009033222019 @default.
• W2000903322 countsByYear W20009033222021 @default.
• W2000903322 countsByYear W20009033222022 @default.
• W2000903322 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000903322 hasAuthorship W2000903322A5008212369 @default.
• W2000903322 hasAuthorship W2000903322A5036098760 @default.
• W2000903322 hasAuthorship W2000903322A5042227937 @default.
• W2000903322 hasAuthorship W2000903322A5045235359 @default.
• W2000903322 hasAuthorship W2000903322A5046980855 @default.
• W2000903322 hasAuthorship W2000903322A5069894068 @default.
• W2000903322 hasAuthorship W2000903322A5080341193 @default.
• W2000903322 hasAuthorship W2000903322A5080805949 @default.
• W2000903322 hasAuthorship W2000903322A5089770272 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C2777382242 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C2780233690 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C3020580240 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C72161134 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C107826830 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C111919701 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C136764020 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C138885662 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C153294291 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C177713679 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C205649164 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C2777382242 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C2778137410 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C2780233690 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C3020580240 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C38652104 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C39432304 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C41008148 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C41895202 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C71924100 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C72161134 @default.
• W2000903322 hasConceptScore W2000903322C98045186 @default.
• W2000903322 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2000903322 hasLocation W20009033221 @default.
• W2000903322 hasOpenAccess W2000903322 @default.
• W2000903322 hasPrimaryLocation W20009033221 @default.
• W2000903322 hasRelatedWork W1538937465 @default.
• W2000903322 hasRelatedWork W2046385589 @default.
• W2000903322 hasRelatedWork W2078186711 @default.
• W2000903322 hasRelatedWork W2088831430 @default.
• W2000903322 hasRelatedWork W2115277736 @default.
• W2000903322 hasRelatedWork W2161666739 @default.
• W2000903322 hasRelatedWork W2318056949 @default.
• W2000903322 hasRelatedWork W2612003171 @default.
• W2000903322 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2000903322 hasRelatedWork W2012842278 @default.
• W2000903322 hasVolume "20" @default.

• next