FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000923655> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000923655 endingPage "1880" @default.
• W2000923655 startingPage "1872" @default.
• W2000923655 abstract "The epicanthal fold along with a lack of a superior palpebral fold, excessive fat, and laxity of pretarsal skin represent the ethnic characteristics and a traditional sense of beauty in the Asian upper eyelid. But, too prominent an epicanthal fold may ruin an otherwise beautiful eye; furthermore, it becomes a restriction that makes the outfold type double eyelidplasty, one of the two main types of double eyelidplasty, impossible. If a double eyelid as an out-fold type is desired, a concomitant epicanthoplasty should be performed with the possibility of hypertrophic scarring of the medial canthal area in Asians. To address the Asian epicanthal fold without danger of hypertrophic scarring, the authors developed an anchor epicanthoplasty technique that leaves no additional scar when combined with a double eyelidplasty. This technique is based on the concept of trimming of muscle and soft tissue under the Asian epicanthal fold and downward medial advancement and anchoring of the medial canthal skin to the deep tissue. The technique consists of five procedures based on the assumed causes of the Asian epicanthal fold: (1) augmentation rhinoplasty, (2) downward medial advancement of the medial upper lid skin, (3) removal of the superficial insertion of the medial canthal ligament and selective removal of the orbicularis oculi muscle, (4) subcutaneous contouring of the thick nasal skin, and (5) anchoring of the medial end of the incision to the deep tissue. During the past 12 years (1988 to 1999), 67 anchor epicanthoplasty procedures have been performed. Twenty-eight cases were followed up for more than 3 months, and all of the patients were satisfied with the results. There were only a few minor complications, which could be corrected with minimal revision. As an ancillary procedure to a double eyelidplasty, this anchor epicanthoplasty can reduce the Asian epicanthal fold and make a double fold as an out-fold type without an additional scar. In terms of hypertrophic scarring and compatibility with out-fold type double eyelidplasty, this anchor epicanthoplasty is the best method for correcting Asian epicanthal fold compared with other preexisting procedures. Other advantages of this technique are a wide range of applications and no compromise of medial canthal skin to interfere with other epicanthoplasty techniques. Some disadvantages of this technique are technical difficulty and the possibility of active bleeding. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 105: 1872, 2000.)" @default.
• W2000923655 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000923655 creator A5025433199 @default.
• W2000923655 creator A5055560618 @default.
• W2000923655 creator A5070046904 @default.
• W2000923655 date "2000-04-01" @default.
• W2000923655 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2000923655 title "Anchor Epicanthoplasty Combined with OutFold Type Double Eyelidplasty for Asians: Do We Have to Make an Additional Scar to Correct the Asian Epicanthal Fold?" @default.
• W2000923655 cites W1991956790 @default.
• W2000923655 cites W2062493156 @default.
• W2000923655 cites W2092262232 @default.
• W2000923655 cites W4234646948 @default.
• W2000923655 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200004050-00040" @default.
• W2000923655 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10809118" @default.
• W2000923655 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2000923655 type Work @default.
• W2000923655 sameAs 2000923655 @default.
• W2000923655 citedByCount "35" @default.
• W2000923655 countsByYear W20009236552012 @default.
• W2000923655 countsByYear W20009236552013 @default.
• W2000923655 countsByYear W20009236552016 @default.
• W2000923655 countsByYear W20009236552017 @default.
• W2000923655 countsByYear W20009236552018 @default.
• W2000923655 countsByYear W20009236552019 @default.
• W2000923655 countsByYear W20009236552020 @default.
• W2000923655 countsByYear W20009236552021 @default.
• W2000923655 countsByYear W20009236552022 @default.
• W2000923655 countsByYear W20009236552023 @default.
• W2000923655 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000923655 hasAuthorship W2000923655A5025433199 @default.
• W2000923655 hasAuthorship W2000923655A5055560618 @default.
• W2000923655 hasAuthorship W2000923655A5070046904 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConcept C2775935860 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConcept C2776082946 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConcept C2781302119 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConceptScore W2000923655C105702510 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConceptScore W2000923655C141071460 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConceptScore W2000923655C2775935860 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConceptScore W2000923655C2776082946 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConceptScore W2000923655C2781302119 @default.
• W2000923655 hasConceptScore W2000923655C71924100 @default.
• W2000923655 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2000923655 hasLocation W20009236551 @default.
• W2000923655 hasLocation W20009236552 @default.
• W2000923655 hasOpenAccess W2000923655 @default.
• W2000923655 hasPrimaryLocation W20009236551 @default.
• W2000923655 hasRelatedWork W1974940639 @default.
• W2000923655 hasRelatedWork W1976917591 @default.
• W2000923655 hasRelatedWork W1983154446 @default.
• W2000923655 hasRelatedWork W1987877452 @default.
• W2000923655 hasRelatedWork W2053606758 @default.
• W2000923655 hasRelatedWork W2132940482 @default.
• W2000923655 hasRelatedWork W2352345344 @default.
• W2000923655 hasRelatedWork W2365820438 @default.
• W2000923655 hasRelatedWork W3032669897 @default.
• W2000923655 hasRelatedWork W4290614457 @default.
• W2000923655 hasVolume "105" @default.
• W2000923655 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2000923655 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2000923655 magId "2000923655" @default.
• W2000923655 workType "article" @default.