FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000966104> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000966104 abstract "To test the hypotheses that: (1) Lumbar spine radiography in primary care patients with low back pain is not associated with improved patient outcomes, including pain, disability, health status, sickness absence, reassurance, and patient satisfaction or belief in the value of radiography. (2) Lumbar spine radiography in primary care patients with low back pain is not associated with changes in patient management, including medication use, and the use of primary and secondary care services, physical therapies and complementary therapies. (3) Participants choosing their treatment group (i.e. radiography or no radiography) do not have better outcomes than those randomised to a treatment group. (4) Lumbar spine radiography is not cost-effective compared with usual care without lumbar spine radiography.A randomised unblinded controlled trial.Seventy-three general practices in Nottingham, North Nottinghamshire, Southern Derbyshire, North Lincolnshire and North Leicestershire. Fifty-two practices recruited participants to the trial.Randomised arm: 421 participants with low back pain, with median duration of 10 weeks. Patient preference arm: 55 participants with low back pain, with median duration of 11 weeks.Lumbar spine radiography and usual care versus usual care without radiography.Roland adaptation of the Sickness Impact Profile, visual analogue pain scale, health status scale, EuroQol, use of primary and secondary care services, and physical and complementary therapies, sickness absence, medication use, patient satisfaction, reassurance and belief in value of radiography at 3 and 9 months post-randomisation.Participants randomised to receive an X-ray were more likely to report low back pain at 3 months (odds ratio (OR) = 1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02 to 2.40) and had a lower overall health status score (p = 0.02). There were no differences in health or functional status at 9 months. A higher proportion of participants consulted the general practitioner (GP) in the 3 months following an X-ray (OR = 2.72; 95% CI, 1.80 to 4.10). There were no differences in use of any other services, medication use or sickness absence at 3 or 9 months. No serious spinal pathology was identified in either group. The commonest X-ray reports were of discovertebral degeneration and normal findings. Many patients did not perceive their information needs were met within the consultation. Satisfaction with care was greater in the group receiving radiography at 9 months. Participants randomised to receive an X-ray were not less worried, or more reassured about serious disease causing their low back pain. Satisfaction was associated with meeting participants' information needs and reduced belief in the necessity for investigations for low back pain, including X-rays and blood tests. In both groups, at 3 and 9 months 80% of participants would choose to have an X-ray if the choice was available. Participants in the patient preference group achieved marginally better outcomes than those randomised to a treatment group, but the clinical significance of these differences is unclear. Lumbar spine radiography was associated with a net economic loss at 3 and 9 months.Lumbar spine radiography in primary care patients with low back pain of at least 6 weeks duration is not associated with improved functioning, severity of pain or overall health status, and is associated with an increase in GP workload. Participants receiving X-rays are more satisfied with their care, but are not less worried or more reassured about serious disease causing their low back pain. CONCLUSIONS - RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Further work is required to develop and test an educational package that educates patients and GPs about the utility of radiography and provides strategies for identifying and meeting the information needs of patients, and the needs of patients and GPs to be reassured about missing serious disease. Guidelines on the management of low back pain in primary care should be consistent about not recommending lumbar spine radiography in patients with low back pain in the absence of red flags for serious spinal pathology, even if the pain has persisted for at least 6 weeks." @default.
• W2000966104 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000966104 creator A5043061207 @default.
• W2000966104 creator A5053881009 @default.
• W2000966104 creator A5073185812 @default.
• W2000966104 creator A5080859282 @default.
• W2000966104 creator A5081106275 @default.
• W2000966104 creator A5083348508 @default.
• W2000966104 date "2001-01-01" @default.
• W2000966104 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2000966104 title "The role of radiography in primary care patients with low back pain of at least 6 weeks duration: a randomised (unblinded) controlled trial" @default.
• W2000966104 cites W146218532 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W1571272128 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W1648669796 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W1684957865 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W1965396636 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W1969236440 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W1976778804 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W1979931730 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W1984451116 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W1990510301 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W1998450641 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W1998997951 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2007511003 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2008100201 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W201587582 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2022506390 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2034956222 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2050850707 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2054434947 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2062025845 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2067804071 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2082136144 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2082402513 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2095294910 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2111608210 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2114010383 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2118516436 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2129867753 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2133546133 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2176451088 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2178128389 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2231767223 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2265991337 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2283358277 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2424755990 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W2473786944 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W92102717 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W95928990 @default.
• W2000966104 cites W142292667 @default.
• W2000966104 doi "https://doi.org/10.3310/hta5300" @default.
• W2000966104 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11701101" @default.
• W2000966104 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2000966104 type Work @default.
• W2000966104 sameAs 2000966104 @default.
• W2000966104 citedByCount "85" @default.
• W2000966104 countsByYear W20009661042012 @default.
• W2000966104 countsByYear W20009661042013 @default.
• W2000966104 countsByYear W20009661042014 @default.
• W2000966104 countsByYear W20009661042015 @default.
• W2000966104 countsByYear W20009661042016 @default.
• W2000966104 countsByYear W20009661042017 @default.
• W2000966104 countsByYear W20009661042018 @default.
• W2000966104 countsByYear W20009661042019 @default.
• W2000966104 countsByYear W20009661042020 @default.
• W2000966104 countsByYear W20009661042021 @default.
• W2000966104 countsByYear W20009661042022 @default.
• W2000966104 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000966104 hasAuthorship W2000966104A5043061207 @default.
• W2000966104 hasAuthorship W2000966104A5053881009 @default.
• W2000966104 hasAuthorship W2000966104A5073185812 @default.
• W2000966104 hasAuthorship W2000966104A5080859282 @default.
• W2000966104 hasAuthorship W2000966104A5081106275 @default.
• W2000966104 hasAuthorship W2000966104A5083348508 @default.
• W2000966104 hasBestOaLocation W20009661041 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C2776501849 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C126322002 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C141071460 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C14184104 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C142724271 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C156957248 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C168563851 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C1862650 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C204787440 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C2776501849 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C2780907711 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C36454342 @default.
• W2000966104 hasConceptScore W2000966104C44575665 @default.

• next