Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000998119> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 84 of
84
with 100 items per page.
- W2000998119 endingPage "322" @default.
- W2000998119 startingPage "320" @default.
- W2000998119 abstract "After 30 years of mass mammographic screening for breast cancer, public health organizations unanimously endorse screening, and health plans and doctors are judged publicly on screening rates. Yet the procedure remains controversial. Last year, the US Preventive Services Task Force reduced its recommended screening duration and frequency, and now another study from respected medical scientists in a top-ranked journal calls mammography into question again. Using national ecologic data on breast cancer incidence and mammography prevalence, Bleyer and Welch [ 1 Bleyer A. Welch H.G. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1998-2005 Crossref PubMed Scopus (976) Google Scholar ] estimated that mass mammographic screening over 3 decades has resulted in overtreatment of 1 million women who might never have gotten sick, about 30% of all breast cancer cases. By extension, many millions more underwent mammography and biopsy while overestimating the benefits and underestimating their potential harms. Point: The New England Journal of Medicine Article Suggesting Overdiagnosis From Mammography Screening Is Scientifically Incorrect and Should Be WithdrawnJournal of the American College of RadiologyVol. 10Issue 5PreviewThe publication of the recent New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) article [1] on the effectiveness of mammographic screening raises two major issues that I will try to address. The first is the lack of scientific rigor in the paper itself. The second is why a highly respected journal would publish such a flawed analysis. Full-Text PDF" @default.
- W2000998119 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2000998119 creator A5003667456 @default.
- W2000998119 date "2013-05-01" @default.
- W2000998119 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
- W2000998119 title "Counterpoint: The New England Journal of Medicine Article Suggesting Overdiagnosis From Mammography Screening Is Scientifically Correct and Should Not Be Withdrawn" @default.
- W2000998119 cites W1874468538 @default.
- W2000998119 cites W2030069582 @default.
- W2000998119 cites W2045216597 @default.
- W2000998119 cites W2095989308 @default.
- W2000998119 cites W2137953499 @default.
- W2000998119 cites W2146899794 @default.
- W2000998119 cites W2169666080 @default.
- W2000998119 cites W2361503148 @default.
- W2000998119 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.01.017" @default.
- W2000998119 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23542031" @default.
- W2000998119 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2000998119 type Work @default.
- W2000998119 sameAs 2000998119 @default.
- W2000998119 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W2000998119 countsByYear W20009981192014 @default.
- W2000998119 countsByYear W20009981192016 @default.
- W2000998119 countsByYear W20009981192020 @default.
- W2000998119 countsByYear W20009981192023 @default.
- W2000998119 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2000998119 hasAuthorship W2000998119A5003667456 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C2778491387 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C2779377019 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C2985871740 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C2994436140 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C121608353 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C126322002 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C142724271 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C17744445 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C199539241 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C204787440 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C2778491387 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C2779377019 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C2779473830 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C2780472235 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C29456083 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C2985871740 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C2994436140 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C3116431 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C512399662 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C530470458 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C71924100 @default.
- W2000998119 hasConceptScore W2000998119C83867959 @default.
- W2000998119 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2000998119 hasLocation W20009981191 @default.
- W2000998119 hasLocation W20009981192 @default.
- W2000998119 hasOpenAccess W2000998119 @default.
- W2000998119 hasPrimaryLocation W20009981191 @default.
- W2000998119 hasRelatedWork W2072327848 @default.
- W2000998119 hasRelatedWork W2109596058 @default.
- W2000998119 hasRelatedWork W2157244930 @default.
- W2000998119 hasRelatedWork W2268554969 @default.
- W2000998119 hasRelatedWork W2400963999 @default.
- W2000998119 hasRelatedWork W2411001056 @default.
- W2000998119 hasRelatedWork W2432186810 @default.
- W2000998119 hasRelatedWork W2884413622 @default.
- W2000998119 hasRelatedWork W4287730148 @default.
- W2000998119 hasRelatedWork W4295817147 @default.
- W2000998119 hasVolume "10" @default.
- W2000998119 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2000998119 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2000998119 magId "2000998119" @default.
- W2000998119 workType "article" @default.