FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2001024914> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2001024914 endingPage "336" @default.
• W2001024914 startingPage "317" @default.
• W2001024914 abstract "Purpose – This study proposes a straightforward set of performance measurements for industrialized nations. The aims of this paper are twofold. First, the paper explores the notion of ranking nations based on food safety performances, beyond benchmarking. The paper appraises how a global comparative analysis could contribute to best practices and continuance improvement in food safety. Second, this paper presents an experiment in which a group of regulators took part in a workshop held in Helsinki, Finland in the Fall 2011. Design/methodology/approach – A session was held in October 2011 in Helsinki, and many countries were invited. A total of 17 countries were represented. The following countries were represented: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Japan, Latvia, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, the UK and the USA. The session was designed to be informative, interactive and flexibly tailored to the delegates' needs and experience. It was also designed to raise awareness and understanding of benchmarking and supra-national ranking systems, what it is and how it can be applied using practical examples from healthcare and across other sectors. Findings – The session also introduced the principles of process thinking and illustrated how process benchmarking can be a useful tool for continuance improvement. The session then built upon the theory presented in the introductory portion by focusing specifically on the essence of ranking indicators. In this session, delegates spent time familiarizing themselves with indicators provided by the University of Guelph, discussing how they might implement it within their individual nations and across the trust as a whole. Practical implications – The collection of primary data was also debated at the session. Public trust, for example, could easily be an indicator which could be included. Measurement of public trust in food safety might be important for governments. It could provide them with information on the performance of the food safety systems from a consumers' perspective. To be an effective indicator of performance the measurement of public trust in food safety should be liable to change. Therefore, changes in performance of the food safety systems have to be reflected through the measurement of public trust in food safety. Originality/value – The Helsinki session is believed to be the first international meeting in which benchmarking metrics were discussed in order to rank countries based on food safety risk practices. Ranking programs in food safety remain controversial. Most particularly, risk assessors and the public service remain skeptical about their effectiveness. The Helsinki meeting was not met to alleviate the skepticism around ranking systems, but it did allow many to better appreciate several perspectives from around the world." @default.
• W2001024914 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2001024914 creator A5000405421 @default.
• W2001024914 creator A5079391440 @default.
• W2001024914 date "2014-02-25" @default.
• W2001024914 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2001024914 title "Empowering the regulators in the development of national performance measurements in food safety" @default.
• W2001024914 cites W1490788847 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W1969147436 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W1975144613 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W1976599136 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W1987661036 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W1993156194 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2011608219 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2023828540 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2033838208 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2042591302 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2047951435 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2086806882 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2087651374 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2100017898 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2110255796 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2119040723 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2129300292 @default.
• W2001024914 cites W2590363107 @default.
• W2001024914 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-05-2012-0124" @default.
• W2001024914 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2001024914 type Work @default.
• W2001024914 sameAs 2001024914 @default.
• W2001024914 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2001024914 countsByYear W20010249142014 @default.
• W2001024914 countsByYear W20010249142015 @default.
• W2001024914 countsByYear W20010249142016 @default.
• W2001024914 countsByYear W20010249142017 @default.
• W2001024914 countsByYear W20010249142018 @default.
• W2001024914 countsByYear W20010249142019 @default.
• W2001024914 countsByYear W20010249142021 @default.
• W2001024914 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2001024914 hasAuthorship W2001024914A5000405421 @default.
• W2001024914 hasAuthorship W2001024914A5079391440 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C2779182362 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C2780081655 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C86251818 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C111919701 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C112698675 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C119857082 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C127413603 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C144133560 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C162853370 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C17744445 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C189430467 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C199539241 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C2779182362 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C2780081655 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C41008148 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C42475967 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C86251818 @default.
• W2001024914 hasConceptScore W2001024914C98045186 @default.
• W2001024914 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2001024914 hasLocation W20010249141 @default.
• W2001024914 hasOpenAccess W2001024914 @default.
• W2001024914 hasPrimaryLocation W20010249141 @default.
• W2001024914 hasRelatedWork W2002409152 @default.
• W2001024914 hasRelatedWork W2050246071 @default.
• W2001024914 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2001024914 hasRelatedWork W2755651540 @default.
• W2001024914 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2001024914 hasRelatedWork W3087157779 @default.
• W2001024914 hasRelatedWork W3128465608 @default.
• W2001024914 hasRelatedWork W3159805121 @default.
• W2001024914 hasRelatedWork W4245777704 @default.
• W2001024914 hasRelatedWork W4306770904 @default.
• W2001024914 hasVolume "116" @default.
• W2001024914 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2001024914 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2001024914 magId "2001024914" @default.
• W2001024914 workType "article" @default.