FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2001027302> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2001027302 abstract "Abstract This paper presents a method of matching formation, rock and reservoir fluid characteristics to the properties of fracturing fluids for optimized stimulation treatments. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of the scanning electron microscope in formation characterization. The other rock and well properties can be determined utilizing standard industry practices. In addition to the traditional fracturing fluid parameters of rheology and fluid leak-off, the volatility, wetting tendencies, inter facial tensions and clay compatibility are discussed and are utilized in the selection process. Introduction Over the course of fracturing history, the decisions involved in choosing fracturing fluids have varied considerably. In earlier years, attempts were made to maximize created fracture area, with no real consideration for the geology and mineralogy of the reservoir. Rather, emphasis was placed on increasing the fracturing fluid efficiency and width generation capabilities. It has long been known that certain fluids give substantially better results on a particular formation than other: fluids, but the success or failure of the fluid selection was largely due to experience. With the advent of scanning electron microscopy, the emphasis shifted to damage occurring as a result of fracturing fluid interaction with authigenic materials in argillaceous reservoirs. The high demand for energy and the interest in low-permeability reservoirs have created a new mysticism involving clay mineralogy. This paper discusses a more detailed fracture selection process which will alleviate some of the misinterpretations. Permeability analysis of formation cores has been an important factor in determining whether a well was capable of commercial production. The fact that measurements are made with gas at pressures significantly different from the formation pressure, however, causes large errors in permeability values, always on the optimistic side. In addition, if a well hasn't been cored it is difficult to obtain permeability data until production has been established, and obtaining production may require stimulation. Permeability values however, can only give (Figure in full paper) a partial picture of pore geometry which should be supplemented by SEM studies, capillary pressure measurements, core flow tests and relative permeability measurements. The purpose of this paper is to combine geology, fluid flows and rock fluid interaction into a logical design process for fracture fluid selection. This process involves the microscopic properties of the rock, including permeability and fracture face damage, the formation heterogeneity, the formation pressures and saturation levels as well as the fracture fluid properties. Sandstone Geology and Permeability Permeability of a porous material characterizes the ease with which a fluid will flow with an applied pressure gradient. The physical parameters of a formation that contribute to permeability variances are the size and shape of the pore spaces, grain packing and fabric, and the degree of cementation. The fabric of a rock is the property concerned with the orientation in space of the component particles. Grains naturally tend to fall such that they lie with their greatest cross section in a horizontal pattern and with their longest axis parallel to water currents thus describing permeability as a directional property." @default.
• W2001027302 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2001027302 creator A5012963421 @default.
• W2001027302 creator A5040180531 @default.
• W2001027302 creator A5064531930 @default.
• W2001027302 date "1982-11-01" @default.
• W2001027302 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2001027302 title "A Logical Approach to Fracture Fluid Selection" @default.
• W2001027302 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/82-06-06" @default.
• W2001027302 hasPublicationYear "1982" @default.
• W2001027302 type Work @default.
• W2001027302 sameAs 2001027302 @default.
• W2001027302 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2001027302 countsByYear W20010273022013 @default.
• W2001027302 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2001027302 hasAuthorship W2001027302A5012963421 @default.
• W2001027302 hasAuthorship W2001027302A5040180531 @default.
• W2001027302 hasAuthorship W2001027302A5064531930 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C115393850 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C120882062 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C130452526 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C134514944 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C14641988 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C183250156 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C199289684 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C200990466 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C2779096232 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C41625074 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C43369102 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C548895740 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C78762247 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConcept C81803558 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C115393850 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C120882062 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C127313418 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C130452526 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C134514944 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C14641988 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C151730666 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C159985019 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C183250156 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C185592680 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C187320778 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C192562407 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C199289684 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C200990466 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C2779096232 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C41625074 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C43369102 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C548895740 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C55493867 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C78762247 @default.
• W2001027302 hasConceptScore W2001027302C81803558 @default.
• W2001027302 hasIssue "06" @default.
• W2001027302 hasLocation W20010273021 @default.
• W2001027302 hasOpenAccess W2001027302 @default.
• W2001027302 hasPrimaryLocation W20010273021 @default.
• W2001027302 hasRelatedWork W2025286476 @default.
• W2001027302 hasRelatedWork W2064229196 @default.
• W2001027302 hasRelatedWork W2075957084 @default.
• W2001027302 hasRelatedWork W2897511396 @default.
• W2001027302 hasRelatedWork W4242793159 @default.
• W2001027302 hasRelatedWork W4244061343 @default.
• W2001027302 hasRelatedWork W4293244724 @default.
• W2001027302 hasRelatedWork W1965765670 @default.
• W2001027302 hasRelatedWork W2224141298 @default.
• W2001027302 hasRelatedWork W2522472209 @default.
• W2001027302 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W2001027302 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2001027302 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2001027302 magId "2001027302" @default.
• W2001027302 workType "article" @default.