FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2001049735> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2001049735 endingPage "1331" @default.
• W2001049735 startingPage "1328" @default.
• W2001049735 abstract "Objective To assess the results and the morbidity of thoracoscopy compared with conventional mediastinoscopy for the approach of mediastinal solid masses and lymph nodes, we have performed a prospective study about the respective yields, complication rates, and the length of hospital stay for patients. Material and methods We have included 114 patients in the study. The criteria of inclusion were the accessibility of the lymph nodes and/or mass to cervical mediastinoscopy through CT scan view. There were 2 groups: 52 patients underwent a mediastinoscopy (group M) and 62 underwent a thoracoscopy (group T). Results There were 3 failures in group M (5.7%) and 5 failures in group T (8.1%) (not significant; NS). In group M, the three procedures were converted to anterior mediastinotomy (two cases) and to thoracoscopy (one case). In group T, the five procedures were converted to anterior mediastinotomy (two cases), mediastinoscopy (two cases), and thoracotomy (one case). The diagnostic yield was 94.3% in group M and 91.9% in group T (NS). After conversion, a diagnosis was reached in all patients in group M (100%) and in all but 1 patient in group T (98.3%) (NS). There was no intraoperative complication in group M, while 2 complications occurred in group T (3.2%) (p<0.05). The overall morbidity was zero in group M and 4.8% in group T (p<0.05). Conclusion The diagnostic yield of mediastinoscopy is comparable to thoracoscopy. Complication rate and hospital stay of patients undergoing mediastinoscopy are significantly inferior. Thoracoscopy should be indicated only for lesions that are not within the reach of the mediastinoscope or when multiple biopsy specimens are necessary. To assess the results and the morbidity of thoracoscopy compared with conventional mediastinoscopy for the approach of mediastinal solid masses and lymph nodes, we have performed a prospective study about the respective yields, complication rates, and the length of hospital stay for patients. We have included 114 patients in the study. The criteria of inclusion were the accessibility of the lymph nodes and/or mass to cervical mediastinoscopy through CT scan view. There were 2 groups: 52 patients underwent a mediastinoscopy (group M) and 62 underwent a thoracoscopy (group T). There were 3 failures in group M (5.7%) and 5 failures in group T (8.1%) (not significant; NS). In group M, the three procedures were converted to anterior mediastinotomy (two cases) and to thoracoscopy (one case). In group T, the five procedures were converted to anterior mediastinotomy (two cases), mediastinoscopy (two cases), and thoracotomy (one case). The diagnostic yield was 94.3% in group M and 91.9% in group T (NS). After conversion, a diagnosis was reached in all patients in group M (100%) and in all but 1 patient in group T (98.3%) (NS). There was no intraoperative complication in group M, while 2 complications occurred in group T (3.2%) (p<0.05). The overall morbidity was zero in group M and 4.8% in group T (p<0.05). The diagnostic yield of mediastinoscopy is comparable to thoracoscopy. Complication rate and hospital stay of patients undergoing mediastinoscopy are significantly inferior. Thoracoscopy should be indicated only for lesions that are not within the reach of the mediastinoscope or when multiple biopsy specimens are necessary." @default.
• W2001049735 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2001049735 creator A5003194888 @default.
• W2001049735 creator A5030009487 @default.
• W2001049735 creator A5038473630 @default.
• W2001049735 creator A5079598422 @default.
• W2001049735 date "1996-11-01" @default.
• W2001049735 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W2001049735 title "Mediastinoscopy vs Thoracoscopy for Mediastinal Biopsy" @default.
• W2001049735 cites W167760760 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W1968853356 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W2016690472 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W2027324642 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W2030139710 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W2035897027 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W2063508525 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W2066272947 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W2075297226 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W2097674110 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W2161808636 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W2197186492 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W41636363 @default.
• W2001049735 cites W53334692 @default.
• W2001049735 doi "https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.110.5.1328" @default.
• W2001049735 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8915241" @default.
• W2001049735 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2001049735 type Work @default.
• W2001049735 sameAs 2001049735 @default.
• W2001049735 citedByCount "89" @default.
• W2001049735 countsByYear W20010497352012 @default.
• W2001049735 countsByYear W20010497352013 @default.
• W2001049735 countsByYear W20010497352014 @default.
• W2001049735 countsByYear W20010497352015 @default.
• W2001049735 countsByYear W20010497352016 @default.
• W2001049735 countsByYear W20010497352017 @default.
• W2001049735 countsByYear W20010497352020 @default.
• W2001049735 countsByYear W20010497352021 @default.
• W2001049735 countsByYear W20010497352022 @default.
• W2001049735 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2001049735 hasAuthorship W2001049735A5003194888 @default.
• W2001049735 hasAuthorship W2001049735A5030009487 @default.
• W2001049735 hasAuthorship W2001049735A5038473630 @default.
• W2001049735 hasAuthorship W2001049735A5079598422 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConcept C2778847313 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConcept C2779056968 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConcept C2779126056 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConcept C2779961022 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConceptScore W2001049735C126838900 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConceptScore W2001049735C141071460 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConceptScore W2001049735C2778451229 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConceptScore W2001049735C2778847313 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConceptScore W2001049735C2779056968 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConceptScore W2001049735C2779126056 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConceptScore W2001049735C2779961022 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConceptScore W2001049735C71924100 @default.
• W2001049735 hasConceptScore W2001049735C81182388 @default.
• W2001049735 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2001049735 hasLocation W20010497351 @default.
• W2001049735 hasLocation W20010497352 @default.
• W2001049735 hasOpenAccess W2001049735 @default.
• W2001049735 hasPrimaryLocation W20010497351 @default.
• W2001049735 hasRelatedWork W1972775530 @default.
• W2001049735 hasRelatedWork W1982975134 @default.
• W2001049735 hasRelatedWork W2058337499 @default.
• W2001049735 hasRelatedWork W2133553300 @default.
• W2001049735 hasRelatedWork W2417917012 @default.
• W2001049735 hasRelatedWork W2474809342 @default.
• W2001049735 hasRelatedWork W2519074815 @default.
• W2001049735 hasRelatedWork W4245416791 @default.
• W2001049735 hasRelatedWork W4294703150 @default.
• W2001049735 hasRelatedWork W92820343 @default.
• W2001049735 hasVolume "110" @default.
• W2001049735 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2001049735 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2001049735 magId "2001049735" @default.
• W2001049735 workType "article" @default.