FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2001199812> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2001199812 endingPage "1694" @default.
• W2001199812 startingPage "1690" @default.
• W2001199812 abstract "Objective To compare a blind manual bedside method for placing feeding tubes into the small bowel vs. a sonographic bedside technique in critically ill patients. Design Prospective study with a random sample. Setting Multidisciplinary intensive care unit in a tertiary care university hospital. Patients Thirty-five adult patients. All patients were hemodynamically stable, mechanically ventilated, and required a nasoenteric tube placement for short-term enteral feeding due to impaired gastric emptying. Interventions A well-known, blind, manual, bedside method for postpyloric tube placement was always attempted first in all cases. The technique was considered successful when a postpyloric location of the tip of the tube was achieved as shown by abdominal roentgenogram. However, if after 30 mins we failed to enter the small bowel, a radiologist attempted a sonographic bedside technique for postpyloric tube insertion. Finally, when the feeding tube was in place, before starting enteral nutrition, a nasogastric tube was inserted into the stomach. Measurements and Main Results The blind manual method was successful in nine (25.7%) of the 35 patients and the final location of these feeding tubes was the proximal jejunum. The average time for placement of the feeding tubes with this manual technique was 13.9 +/- 7.4 mins (range 5 to 30). The sonographic technique was succesful in 22 (84.6%) of the remaining patients and the final location of the feeding tubes was three (11%) tubes in the second portion of the duodenum, eight (31%) tubes in the third portion of the duodenum, and 11 (42%) tubes in the proximal jejunum. The average time for placement with the sonographic technique was 18.3 +/- 8.2 mins (range 5 to 35). The pyloric outlet was sonographically akinetic or severely hypokinetic in 13 patients, and in four of them, we were unable to achieve postpyloric tube placement. In these four patients, the tubes were subsequently placed by endoscopy. Conclusions The sonographic bedside technique for placing feeding tubes into the small bowel in critically ill patients has a success rate of 84.6% (confidence interval 71% to 98%) after the failure of the blind bedside manual method, proving that the former is significantly more successful. This sonographic technique facilitates the insertion of the tubes in patients who cannot be moved and in those patients with severe impairment of the peristaltic activity of the stomach. (Crit Care Med 1996; 24:1690-1694)" @default.
• W2001199812 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2001199812 creator A5018349978 @default.
• W2001199812 creator A5022323650 @default.
• W2001199812 creator A5051172889 @default.
• W2001199812 creator A5055766317 @default.
• W2001199812 creator A5078131166 @default.
• W2001199812 date "1996-10-01" @default.
• W2001199812 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2001199812 title "Bedside sonographic-guided versus blind nasoenteric feeding tube placement in critically ill patients" @default.
• W2001199812 cites W1968137233 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W1973022658 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W1992381716 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W1999566834 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W2012518797 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W2044917182 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W2048180684 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W2058015117 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W2075599431 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W2091302913 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W2107040540 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W2122329156 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W2126470435 @default.
• W2001199812 cites W2164308606 @default.
• W2001199812 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199610000-00015" @default.
• W2001199812 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8874307" @default.
• W2001199812 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2001199812 type Work @default.
• W2001199812 sameAs 2001199812 @default.
• W2001199812 citedByCount "92" @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122012 @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122013 @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122014 @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122015 @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122016 @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122017 @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122018 @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122019 @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122020 @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122021 @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122022 @default.
• W2001199812 countsByYear W20011998122023 @default.
• W2001199812 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2001199812 hasAuthorship W2001199812A5018349978 @default.
• W2001199812 hasAuthorship W2001199812A5022323650 @default.
• W2001199812 hasAuthorship W2001199812A5051172889 @default.
• W2001199812 hasAuthorship W2001199812A5055766317 @default.
• W2001199812 hasAuthorship W2001199812A5078131166 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C2776809568 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C2777355116 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C2778045676 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C2779422922 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C2987404301 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C2991859549 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C3020479747 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C44315111 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConcept C78722104 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C126322002 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C141071460 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C177713679 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C2776376669 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C2776809568 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C2777355116 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C2778045676 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C2779422922 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C2987404301 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C2991859549 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C3020479747 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C44315111 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C71924100 @default.
• W2001199812 hasConceptScore W2001199812C78722104 @default.
• W2001199812 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2001199812 hasLocation W20011998121 @default.
• W2001199812 hasLocation W20011998122 @default.
• W2001199812 hasOpenAccess W2001199812 @default.
• W2001199812 hasPrimaryLocation W20011998121 @default.
• W2001199812 hasRelatedWork W11802575 @default.
• W2001199812 hasRelatedWork W184524342 @default.
• W2001199812 hasRelatedWork W2095988945 @default.
• W2001199812 hasRelatedWork W2129672579 @default.
• W2001199812 hasRelatedWork W2131840342 @default.
• W2001199812 hasRelatedWork W2399654014 @default.
• W2001199812 hasRelatedWork W2410948508 @default.
• W2001199812 hasRelatedWork W3040669656 @default.
• W2001199812 hasRelatedWork W3091823170 @default.
• W2001199812 hasRelatedWork W2161982898 @default.
• W2001199812 hasVolume "24" @default.
• W2001199812 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2001199812 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2001199812 magId "2001199812" @default.
• W2001199812 workType "article" @default.