FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2001236030> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2001236030 endingPage "542" @default.
• W2001236030 startingPage "524" @default.
• W2001236030 abstract "To date, most evaluations of the Accords negotiated between the Australian Coun cil of Trade Unions and the Labor government have been on the basis of perform ance indicators before and after the implementation of the agreements. The comparative approach with other economies of similar size and structure but different policy regimes has not been widely used. This paper attempts to demon strate, first, that the Canadian and Australian economies have sufficient structural similarities to make the comparative approach meaningful and, second, that the Accord policy framework has had limited impact on macroeconomic indicators, with one significant exception, the rate of employment growth, which has been consistently higher in Australia than in Canada. However, a prima facie case is also made for the argument that the social democratic Accord process of industrial and labour force restructuring has re sulted in a maintenance or strengthening of the social wage and social safety net in Australia, whereas in Canada, under a neo-liberal (or neo-conservative) pro gramme, the social wage and social programmes have been under continuous and sustained attack. 1. However, for Australia-New Zealand comparisons, see Easton and Gerritsen, 1995, and Keizer and Muysken, 1995. Although not intended as an evaluation of the Accords, Australia Reconstructed (Australian Council of Trade Unions/Trade Development Council, 1987) includes fairly comprehensive comparisons of the Australian economy and policies with those of Austria, Norway, Sweden, West Germany and the United Kingdom from the 1960s to 1986. The Accord period covered is too short, however, for any significant evaluation. On the other hand, there have been a number of comparative studies of industrial relations systems. Of particular relevance here, see Reid, 1993; Gilson, 1991a, Gilson, 1991b; McCalman, 1992; and Dowrick, 1993. 2. This summary is taken from Stilwell, 1991, except for the year 1993, which is the author's summary of the main points in Putting Jobs First (Australian Council of Trade Unions, 1993a). 3. Other criteria for comparative analysis, such as regional proximity and shared history can be, and have been, used. See, for example, Easton and Gerritsen, 1995, for an Australia-New Zealand comparative analysis of economic policy and macroeconomic performance under Labor governments. 4. The Australian system is frequently referred to as 'centralized' because of the pivotal role of the federal Conciliation and Arbitration Commission. However, as Dabscheck points out, the commission in the recent period oscillated between centralized decision making based on wage indexation (1975-81), decentralization (1981-82), and centrali zation in the form of a wage freeze (1982-83), followed by wage indexation under the Accord Mark I. Subsequently, in the 1991 National Wage Case, the commission again moved toward decentralization with the acceptance of enterprise bargaining (Dabscheck, 1989, pp. 28-40). 5. In fact, the most serious attack in transfers and social programmes in Canada has come in the 1995 budget of the Liberal government, which replaced the Conservatives in 1993. Given these drastic cutbacks, we would expect a substantial acceleration in the deterioration of Canada's performance relative to that of Australia after 1995. In this respect the Liberals have proved more neo-liberal than the ostensibly more right-wing Conservatives. 7. The use of the term 'social democratic' to describe the Australian (Labor) Accord model is open to criticism, particularly given Labor's companion neo-liberal policies of deregulation of capital, financial and international trade markets. In correspondence with the author, John King suggests that the term (European) Christian Democratic might be a more appropriate designation of Labor's approach. However, it is perhaps more in keeping with conventional views to continue to refer to Labor's approach as social democratic to differentiate it from the neo-conservative (or neo-liberal) approach of the Canadian and Australian liberal and conservative parties." @default.
• W2001236030 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2001236030 creator A5052096816 @default.
• W2001236030 date "1995-12-01" @default.
• W2001236030 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2001236030 title "Evaluating the Accord(s): A Comparative Canadian Perspective" @default.
• W2001236030 cites W192236744 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W1964159815 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W1966341054 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W1979472407 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W1982128152 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W1984372050 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W1992359364 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W1994855265 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W1998560136 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2011823531 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2019908430 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2031251339 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2033856401 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2037468517 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2039115579 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2043273360 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2078483486 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2090153047 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2117806397 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2319192245 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2523332059 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2916075914 @default.
• W2001236030 cites W2917527951 @default.
• W2001236030 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/002218569503700402" @default.
• W2001236030 hasPublicationYear "1995" @default.
• W2001236030 type Work @default.
• W2001236030 sameAs 2001236030 @default.
• W2001236030 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2001236030 countsByYear W20012360302012 @default.
• W2001236030 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2001236030 hasAuthorship W2001236030A5052096816 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C100243477 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C136264566 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C145236788 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C159717818 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C2777388388 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C2779444201 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C45237549 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C100243477 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C10138342 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C136264566 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C138885662 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C145236788 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C159717818 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C162324750 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C17744445 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C185592680 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C199539241 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C2777388388 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C2778137410 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C2779444201 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C34447519 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C41895202 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C45237549 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C55493867 @default.
• W2001236030 hasConceptScore W2001236030C98184364 @default.
• W2001236030 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2001236030 hasLocation W20012360301 @default.
• W2001236030 hasOpenAccess W2001236030 @default.
• W2001236030 hasPrimaryLocation W20012360301 @default.
• W2001236030 hasRelatedWork W2166431563 @default.
• W2001236030 hasRelatedWork W2387767581 @default.
• W2001236030 hasRelatedWork W2592392370 @default.
• W2001236030 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2001236030 hasRelatedWork W2906752211 @default.
• W2001236030 hasRelatedWork W3048895930 @default.
• W2001236030 hasRelatedWork W3092864397 @default.
• W2001236030 hasRelatedWork W3122395323 @default.
• W2001236030 hasRelatedWork W3158571753 @default.
• W2001236030 hasRelatedWork W4212903279 @default.
• W2001236030 hasVolume "37" @default.
• W2001236030 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2001236030 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2001236030 magId "2001236030" @default.
• W2001236030 workType "article" @default.