FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2001260108> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2001260108 endingPage "170" @default.
• W2001260108 startingPage "161" @default.
• W2001260108 abstract "Study objectiveWe develop and evaluate the Handoff Communication Assessment, using actual handoffs of patient transfers from emergency department to inpatient care.MethodsThis was an observational qualitative study. We derived a Handoff Communication Assessment tool, using categories from discourse coding described in physician-patient communication, previous handoff research in medicine, health communication, and health systems engineering and pilot data from 3 physician-hospitalist handoffs. The resulting tool consists of 2 typologies, content and language form. We applied the tool to a convenience sample of 15 emergency physician-to-hospitalist handoffs occurring at a community teaching hospital. Using discourse analysis, we assigned utterances into categories and determined the frequency of utterances in each category and by physician role.ResultsThe tool contains 11 content categories reflecting topics of patient presentation, assessment, and professional environment and 11 language form categories representing information-seeking, information-giving, and information-verifying behaviors. The Handoff Communication Assessment showed good interrater reliability for content (κ=0.71) and language form (κ=0.84). We analyzed 742 utterances, which provided the following preliminary findings: emergency physicians talked more during handoffs (67.7% of all utterances) compared with hospitalists (32.3% of all utterances). Content focused on patient presentation (43.6%), professional environment (36%), and assessment (20.3%). Form was mostly information-giving (90.7%) with periodic information-seeking utterances (8.8%) and rarely information-verifying utterances (0.4%). Questions accounted for less than 10% of all utterances.ConclusionWe were able to develop and use the Handoff Communication Assessment to analyze content and structure of handoff communication between emergency physicians and hospitalists at a single center. In this preliminary application of the tool, we found that emergency physician–to-hospitalist handoffs primarily consist of information giving and are not geared toward question-and-answer events. This critical exchange may benefit from ongoing analysis and reformulation. We develop and evaluate the Handoff Communication Assessment, using actual handoffs of patient transfers from emergency department to inpatient care. This was an observational qualitative study. We derived a Handoff Communication Assessment tool, using categories from discourse coding described in physician-patient communication, previous handoff research in medicine, health communication, and health systems engineering and pilot data from 3 physician-hospitalist handoffs. The resulting tool consists of 2 typologies, content and language form. We applied the tool to a convenience sample of 15 emergency physician-to-hospitalist handoffs occurring at a community teaching hospital. Using discourse analysis, we assigned utterances into categories and determined the frequency of utterances in each category and by physician role. The tool contains 11 content categories reflecting topics of patient presentation, assessment, and professional environment and 11 language form categories representing information-seeking, information-giving, and information-verifying behaviors. The Handoff Communication Assessment showed good interrater reliability for content (κ=0.71) and language form (κ=0.84). We analyzed 742 utterances, which provided the following preliminary findings: emergency physicians talked more during handoffs (67.7% of all utterances) compared with hospitalists (32.3% of all utterances). Content focused on patient presentation (43.6%), professional environment (36%), and assessment (20.3%). Form was mostly information-giving (90.7%) with periodic information-seeking utterances (8.8%) and rarely information-verifying utterances (0.4%). Questions accounted for less than 10% of all utterances. We were able to develop and use the Handoff Communication Assessment to analyze content and structure of handoff communication between emergency physicians and hospitalists at a single center. In this preliminary application of the tool, we found that emergency physician–to-hospitalist handoffs primarily consist of information giving and are not geared toward question-and-answer events. This critical exchange may benefit from ongoing analysis and reformulation." @default.
• W2001260108 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2001260108 creator A5010462474 @default.
• W2001260108 creator A5016533703 @default.
• W2001260108 creator A5023610964 @default.
• W2001260108 creator A5031880261 @default.
• W2001260108 creator A5033462351 @default.
• W2001260108 creator A5044819644 @default.
• W2001260108 creator A5048134192 @default.
• W2001260108 date "2010-02-01" @default.
• W2001260108 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2001260108 title "Exploring Emergency Physician–Hospitalist Handoff Interactions: Development of the Handoff Communication Assessment" @default.
• W2001260108 cites W1972322207 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W1973951483 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W1992942093 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2020237972 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2043275952 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2045133435 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2045875830 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2046843608 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2051082266 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2062600654 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2077013338 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2113738313 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2115668976 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2134227642 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2137635834 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2141416323 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2161436956 @default.
• W2001260108 cites W2323535830 @default.
• W2001260108 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.09.021" @default.
• W2001260108 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19944486" @default.
• W2001260108 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2001260108 type Work @default.
• W2001260108 sameAs 2001260108 @default.
• W2001260108 citedByCount "96" @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082012 @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082013 @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082014 @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082015 @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082016 @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082017 @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082018 @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082019 @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082020 @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082021 @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082022 @default.
• W2001260108 countsByYear W20012601082023 @default.
• W2001260108 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2001260108 hasAuthorship W2001260108A5010462474 @default.
• W2001260108 hasAuthorship W2001260108A5016533703 @default.
• W2001260108 hasAuthorship W2001260108A5023610964 @default.
• W2001260108 hasAuthorship W2001260108A5031880261 @default.
• W2001260108 hasAuthorship W2001260108A5033462351 @default.
• W2001260108 hasAuthorship W2001260108A5044819644 @default.
• W2001260108 hasAuthorship W2001260108A5048134192 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C111852164 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C162446236 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C2779328685 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C61863361 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C111852164 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C126838900 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C138496976 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C142724271 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C144024400 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C15744967 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C159110408 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C160735492 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C162324750 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C162446236 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C23131810 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C2777601897 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C2779328685 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C2780724011 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C31258907 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C36289849 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C41008148 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C50522688 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C545542383 @default.
• W2001260108 hasConceptScore W2001260108C61863361 @default.

• next