FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2001306989> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2001306989 endingPage "23548" @default.
• W2001306989 startingPage "23542" @default.
• W2001306989 abstract "Previous characterization of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase FER identified a tight physical association with the catenin pp120 and led to the suggestion that FER may be involved in cell-cell signaling. To further understand the function of FER, we have continued our analyses of the interaction of FER with pp120 and other proteins. The majority of FER is localized to the cytoplasmic fraction where it forms a complex with the actin-binding protein cortactin. The Src homology 2 sequence of FER is required for directly binding cortactin, and phosphorylation of the FER-cortactin complex is up-regulated in cells treated with peptide growth factors. Using a dominant-negative mutant of FER, we provided evidence that FER kinase activity is required for the growth factor-dependent phosphorylation of cortactin. These data suggest that cortactin is likely to be a direct substrate of FER. Our observations provide additional support for a role of FER in mediating signaling from the cell surface, via growth factor receptors, to the cytoskeleton. The nature of the FER-cortactin interaction, and their putative enzyme-substrate relationship, support the previous proposal that one of the functions of the Src homology 2 sequences of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases is to provide a binding site for their preferred substrates. Previous characterization of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase FER identified a tight physical association with the catenin pp120 and led to the suggestion that FER may be involved in cell-cell signaling. To further understand the function of FER, we have continued our analyses of the interaction of FER with pp120 and other proteins. The majority of FER is localized to the cytoplasmic fraction where it forms a complex with the actin-binding protein cortactin. The Src homology 2 sequence of FER is required for directly binding cortactin, and phosphorylation of the FER-cortactin complex is up-regulated in cells treated with peptide growth factors. Using a dominant-negative mutant of FER, we provided evidence that FER kinase activity is required for the growth factor-dependent phosphorylation of cortactin. These data suggest that cortactin is likely to be a direct substrate of FER. Our observations provide additional support for a role of FER in mediating signaling from the cell surface, via growth factor receptors, to the cytoskeleton. The nature of the FER-cortactin interaction, and their putative enzyme-substrate relationship, support the previous proposal that one of the functions of the Src homology 2 sequences of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases is to provide a binding site for their preferred substrates. Src homology 2 platelet-derived growth factor macrophage-colony stimulating factor 100,000 × gsupernatant 100,000 × g pellet hemagglutinin glutathione S-transferase coiled coiled domain cytomegalovirus phosphate-buffered saline. The cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase FER belongs to a relatively small family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases that consist of only one other member, FES (1Letwin K. Yee S.-P. Pawson T. Oncogene. 1988; 3: 621-627PubMed Google Scholar, 2Hao Q.L. Heisterkamp N. Groffen J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989; 9: 1587-1593Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar). The FES gene product in expressed only in cells of myeloid and endothelial lineages and has been implicated in cytokine signaling (3MacDonald I. Levy J. Pawson T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1985; 5: 2543-2551Crossref PubMed Scopus (96) Google Scholar, 4Feldman R.A. Gabrilove J.L. Tam J.P. Moore M.A.S. Hanafusa H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1985; 82: 2383-2397Google Scholar, 5Greer P. Maltby V. Rossant J. Bernstein A. Pawson T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990; 10: 2521-2527Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 6Greer P. Haigh J. Mbamalu G. Khoo W. Bernstein A. Pawson T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 6755-6763Crossref PubMed Scopus (93) Google Scholar, 7Hanazono Y. Chiba S. Sasaki K. Mano H. Miyajima A. Arai K. Yazaki Y. Hirai H. EMBO J. 1993; 12: 1641-1646Crossref PubMed Scopus (144) Google Scholar, 8Areces L.B. Dello Sbarba P. Jucker M. Stanley E.R. Feldman R.A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 4606-4615Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar, 9Izuhara K. Feldman R.A. Greer P. Harada N. J. Biol. Chem. 1994; 269: 18623-18629Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). In contrast, FER is expressed ubiquitously and its function remains poorly understood. FER is structurally distinct from members of the other cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase families; its amino acid sequence contains a catalytic domain adjacent to a single Src homology 2 (SH2)1 domain and an extensive coiled coil sequence in the amino terminus (2Hao Q.L. Heisterkamp N. Groffen J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989; 9: 1587-1593Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar, 10Kim L. Wong T.W. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 4553-4561Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). We previously showed that FER is tightly associated with the novel catenin pp120 and that the FER·pp120 complex is phosphorylated on tyrosines upon treatment of cells with growth factors (10Kim L. Wong T.W. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 4553-4561Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). However, the significance of the interaction remains to be elucidated, because the function of pp120 is also not well understood. Tyrosine phosphorylation has been demonstrated to be an important mechanism for regulating cell-cell and cell-substrate adhesions. For example, inhibition of tyrosine phosphatases in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells results in the deterioration of adherens junctions and dramatic changes in cell morphology (11Volberg T. Zick Y. Dror R. Sabanay I. Gilon C. Levitzki A. Geiger B. EMBO J. 1992; 11: 1733-1742Crossref PubMed Scopus (269) Google Scholar). Treatment of epithelial cells with epidermal growth factor leads to the tyrosine phosphorylation of β-catenin, plakoglobin and pp120, as well as changes in cell morphology (12Hoschuetzky H. Aberle H. Kemler R. J. Cell Biol. 1994; 127: 1375-1380Crossref PubMed Scopus (673) Google Scholar, 13Welsh J.B. Gill G.N. Rosenfeld M.G. Wells A. J. Cell Biol. 1991; 114: 533-543Crossref PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar). More importantly, the major targets of v-src kinase activity have been shown to be proteins that are directly implicated in cell adhesion or cytoskeletal function. These include focal adhesion kinase, cortactin, p130cas, and pp120 (14Scheller M.D. Bouton A.H. Flynn D.C. Parsons J.T. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. 1993; 44: 205-227Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar). Results of subcellular localization and functional characterization have implicated these proteins in regulating cell motility or membrane cytoskeleton dynamics. Focal adhesion kinase and p130cas are localized to focal adhesion complexes and focal adhesion kinase has been demonstrated to be required for the turnover of the cellular structures (15Ilic D. Furuta Y. Knazawa S. Takeda N. Sobue K. Nakatsuji N. Nomura S. Fujimoto J. Okada M. Yamamoto T. Aizawa S. Nature. 1995; 377: 539-544Crossref PubMed Scopus (1591) Google Scholar, 16Guan J.L. Matrix Biol. 1997; 16: 195-200Crossref PubMed Scopus (133) Google Scholar, 17Schaller M.D. Borgman C.A. Cobb B.S. Vines R.R. Reynolds A.B. Parsons J.T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992; 89: 5192-5196Crossref PubMed Scopus (1295) Google Scholar, 18Hanks S.K. Calalb M.B. Harper M.C. Patel S.K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U. S. A. 1992; 89: 8487-8491Crossref PubMed Scopus (731) Google Scholar, 19Nakamoto T. Sakai R. Honda H. Ogawa S. Ueno H. Suzuki T. Aizawa S. Yazaki Y. Hirai H. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997; 17: 3884-3897Crossref PubMed Scopus (136) Google Scholar). Cortactin has been shown to bind F-actin in vitro and is localized to the cortical cytoskeleton (20Wu H. Reynolds A.B. Kanner S.B. Vines R.R. Parsons J.T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991; 11: 5113-5124Crossref PubMed Scopus (375) Google Scholar, 21Wu H. Parsons J.T. J. Cell Biol. 1993; 120: 1417-1426Crossref PubMed Scopus (452) Google Scholar). pp120 is a component of the cadherin-catenin complexes and, as such, may be involved in membrane-cytoskeleton interactions (22Reynolds A.B. Daniel J. McCrea P. Wheelock M.J. Zhang Z. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 8333-8342Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 23Daniel J.M. Reynolds A.B. Bioessays. 1997; 19: 883-891Crossref PubMed Scopus (285) Google Scholar). The association of FER and pp120, and their phosphorylation in cells treated with growth factors, led us to speculate that FER may be involved in a signaling pathway linking growth factor receptors with cell adhesion or the cytoskeleton. In this report, we describe studies aimed at further characterization of the interaction of FER with other cellular components. We also report on the results of experiments, using a dominant-negative FER mutant, that seek to analyze the function of the FER kinase. NIH3T3 and human embryonic kidney 293 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% calf serum and 10% fetal bovine serum, respectively. Glutathione S-Sepharose was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine and anti-pp120 antibodies were from Transduction Laboratories. Monoclonal anti-cortactin antibody (4F11) was from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. Anti-hemagglutinin (12CA5) antibodies were from Boehringer Mannheim. Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG were from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratory. Polyclonal anti-dynamin antibodies were provided by Dr. Mark McNiven of the Mayo Clinic. Polyclonal FER1 and FER5 antisera were described previously (10Kim L. Wong T.W. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 4553-4561Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). They were generated by immunizing rabbits with fusion proteins that contain codons 502–675 and codons 451–564 of FER, respectively. Antiserum FER2 was prepared also using a TrpE fusion protein containing codons 502–675. Full-length FER cDNA was isolated from a human foreskin fibroblast cDNA library (CLONTECH) using as probe a polymerase chain reaction fragment that encompasses codons 149–332. A single lysine to arginine mutation was introduced at codon 591, using the SculptorTM in vitro mutagenesis kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Both the wild-type and K591R mutant cDNA sequences were subcloned in a CMV-based eukaryotic expression vector to yield pCMV-HA-FER(WT) and pCMV-HA-FER(K591R). The subcloning was designed to introduce an influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) epitope at the amino terminus of the FER sequences. The human CSF-1 receptor cDNA was kindly provided by Dr. C. Sherr of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at St. Jude's Medical Center and was subcloned into the CMV expression vector to yield pCMV-CSF1R. Details of the subcloning procedures will be provided upon request. Confluent cultures of NIH3T3 cells were serum-starved and stimulated with platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) as described before (10Kim L. Wong T.W. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 4553-4561Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). Cells were rinsed twice with cold PBS and scraped into ice-cold hypotonic buffer (20 mmTris·HCl, pH 7.7, 15 mm NaCl, 2 mmMgCl2, 1 mm sodium orthovanadate, and 40 μm ammonium molybdate) (1 ml/10-cm plate). The cell suspension was allowed to swell on ice for 15 min, and cell lysis was achieved by homogenization in a tight-fitting glass homogenizer. The cell lysates were centrifuged for 10 min at 2000 rpm in a tabletop centrifuge to remove nuclei and unbroken cells. The postnuclear supernatants were centrifuged for 90 min at 100,000 ×g to yield an S100 supernatant. The pelleted material was resuspended by homogenization in 3 ml of buffer that contained 5% glycerol, 20 mm Tris·HCl, pH 7.7, 1 mm EDTA, 150 mm NaCl, 1 mm sodium orthovanadate, and 40 mm ammonium molybdate. To that suspension was added 10% Triton X-100 to a final concentration of 1%. The mixture was clarified by centrifugation (10,000 ×g, 10 min) to yield a solubilized membrane (P100) fraction. Protein concentrations were determined using the microBCA reagents (Pierce). Whole-cell lysates were prepared as described previously (10Kim L. Wong T.W. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 4553-4561Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). Immunoprecipitations were performed as described before, using typically 300 μg of S100 and 30 μg of P100 fractions and 5 μg of purified antibodies or 5 μl of antisera (10Kim L. Wong T.W. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 4553-4561Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). Immunoblotting was performed using standard techniques, and binding was detected with enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For immune complex kinase assays, whole-cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with FER5 antiserum, and kinase assays were performed as described before (10Kim L. Wong T.W. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 4553-4561Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). Preparation of GST fusion proteins and in vitro binding assays were performed as described before (10Kim L. Wong T.W. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 4553-4561Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). In binding assays that involved GST-CCD, the detection of cortactin required an intermediate immunoprecipitation, because the GST-CCD polypeptide comigrates with cortactin on SDS gels and prohibits the unambiguous detection of cortactin. In those experiments, proteins bound to immobilized GST fusion proteins were eluted by boiling in 1% SDS. The samples were diluted with 1% Triton X-100 to bring the final SDS concentration to 0.2%. The eluted materials were then immunoprecipitated with anti-cortactin antibody before analyses by Western blotting. GST pull-down experiments in denaturing conditions were performed by first immunoprecipitating S100 fractions with 5 μg of anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. The immunoprecipitates were denatured by boiling in SDS and diluted with 1% Triton X-100 as above. The immunoprecipitated proteins were then incubated with GST fusion proteins immobilized on Sepharose beads, and bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting. NIH3T3 cells were seeded on glass coverslips and were serum-starved before treatment with PDGF for 5 min. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (room temperature for 5 min) and were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS (10 min). Following blocking with 2% bovine serum albumin in PBS, cells were stained with FER5 antiserum (1:400) and anti-cortactin mAb 4F11 (1:2000). This was followed by staining with labeled second antibodies and mounting of the coverslips. Cells were examined using an Olympus BH2 microscope and photographed. 293 cells (106 cells) were seeded in 10-cm dishes and were transfected 24 h later using the modified calcium phosphate procedure (24Chen C. Okayama H. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1987; 7: 2745-2752Crossref PubMed Scopus (4824) Google Scholar). Each culture received 2 μg of pCMV-CSF1R in the presence of 14 μg of either pCMV vector, pCMV-HA-FER, or pCMV-HA-FER(K591R). The amounts and ratio of cDNA used were optimized in prior experiments to obtain maximal expression of both CSF-1R and the FER cDNAs. At 14–18 h after transfection, cells were rinsed and fed with fresh culture medium. After another 4–12 h, the culture medium was replaced with starvation medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium plus 0.5% fetal bovine serum and 10 mm Hepes). The cultures were starved overnight and stimulated with M-CSF (100 ng/ml, R & D Systems) for 5 min. Cells were harvested and lysed as described above. We previously used an immunological approach to identify the association of FER with pp120 (10Kim L. Wong T.W. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 4553-4561Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). To further identify other components that may interact with FER, we prepared additional FER-specific antisera and analyzed their ability to immunoprecipitate FER-containing complexes from lysates of NIH3T3 cells. As shown previously, antiserum FER1 immunoprecipitated a complex of FER and pp120 (Fig. 1, lanes 3 and 4). PDGF treatment resulted in an increase in the phosphorylation of both FER and pp120. Two other FER-specific antisera, FER2 and FER5, also immunoprecipitated FER, as well as a small amount of the 180-kDa activated PDGF receptor (Fig. 1, lanes 5–8). However, little or no pp120 was co-immunoprecipitated by either of these two antisera. FER5 immunoprecipitated additional polypeptides of 125 kDa and >205 kDa. The identity of these polypeptides has yet to be determined. These anti-FER antisera may therefore recognize distinct subpopulations or conformations of FER. Because many proteins that regulate cell-cell or cell-substrate adhesion are found in detergent-insoluble cytoskeletal structures, the use of detergent lysates may preclude the detection of some FER complexes. We therefore prepared subcellular fractions by hypotonic lysis and verified the fractionation of subcellular components by Western blot analyses. The membrane (P100) fraction showed the expected enrichment of the PDGF receptor, which is the major tyrosine phosphorylated protein in cells treated with PDGF (Fig. 2 A, lanes 3 and 4). As shown previously, pp120 is enriched in the P100 fraction (25Kanner S.B. Reynolds A.B. Parsons J.T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991; 11: 713-720Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar). Conversely, FER is localized mostly in the cytosolic (S100) fraction, but a detectable amount is also recovered in the membrane pellet. Other signaling molecules, such as cortactin and dynamin, showed predominantly cytosolic localization but with significant extent of membrane association as well. From the S100 fractions, both FER1 and FER2 antisera immunoprecipitated a doublet of 97 and 102 kDa (Fig. 2 B), of which only the 97-kDa polypeptide cross-reacted with FER antibodies in Western blotting (Fig. 2 C). Antiserum FER2 also immunoprecipitated an 85-kDa phosphorylated polypeptide, which cross-reacted with antibodies to the actin-binding protein cortactin (Fig. 2, B and D). PDGF treatment resulted in an increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of FER, the 102-kDa polypeptide, as well as cortactin. In the case of cortactin, there is substantial basal phosphorylation, and the extent of association with FER appears to be insensitive to growth factor treatment. The identity of the 102-kDa polypeptide that co-immunoprecipitated with FER was analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies to signaling molecules of this size range. Antibodies to dynamin cross-reacted with a 102-kDa polypeptide that was specifically co-immunoprecipitated by the FER antisera, but not by nonimmune antibodies (Fig. 2 E). However, the abundance of the dynamin in the FER immunoprecipitates did not correlate with the reactivity to the anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (compare lanes 5–8 of B with those in E). As expected from the known localization of pp120, the FER·pp120 complex was enriched in the P100 fraction and was immunoprecipitated by antiserum FER1 (Fig. 2 F). Immunoprecipitates prepared with antiserum FER2 contained a significant amount of cortactin, but only a trace of pp120 (Fig. 2, Gand H). In contrast to the immunoprecipitates prepared with the S100 fractions, the P100 fraction immunoprecipitates did not contain any detectable amount of the 102-kDa phosphoprotein. To further ascertain the FER-cortactin association, the subcellular localization of the two proteins were analyzed by double immunofluorescence staining. In unsynchronized fibroblasts, cortactin was previously shown to colocalize with cortical actin filaments (20Wu H. Reynolds A.B. Kanner S.B. Vines R.R. Parsons J.T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991; 11: 5113-5124Crossref PubMed Scopus (375) Google Scholar,21Wu H. Parsons J.T. J. Cell Biol. 1993; 120: 1417-1426Crossref PubMed Scopus (452) Google Scholar). We found that, in quiescent fibroblasts, cortactin is in the cortex, but a significant amount is also detected in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3). In these cells, FER is localized primarily in the cytoplasm, although a detectable extent of colocalization with cortactin in the cell cortex can also be observed (A and B). The staining obtained with the FER antiserum was specific, because it was not observed with preimmune serum or if the antiserum was preincubated with the immunogen. In PDGF-treated cells, cortactin becomes enriched in the cell cortex, and colocalization with FER is clearly visible in the membrane ruffles (Fig. 3, C and D). The molecular basis of the FER-cortactin association was further examined in in vitro binding assays. A GST fusion protein containing the SH2 sequence of FER specifically precipitated cortactin from a cytosolic fraction (Fig. 4, A and B). The CCD of FER, which was previously shown to mediate interaction with pp120, did not interact with cortactin. Cortactin is one of the major cytosolic proteins that are subject to PDGF-regulated tyrosine phosphorylation and which bind the FER SH2 sequence in vitro (Fig. 4, C and D). We also tested the ability of the FER SH2 sequence to directly interact with cortactin. Cytosolic proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies and denatured. Cortactin was the predominant component that, following denaturation and renaturation, retained the ability to bind the FER SH2 sequence (Fig. 4, E and F). This suggests that the FER SH2 sequence has the capacity to directly interact with cortactin. In addition to cortactin, a 102-kDa polypeptide was found to co-immunoprecipitate with FER from the cytosolic fraction. Although dynamin can be detected in the FER immunoprecipitates, its abundance in the immune complexes suggests that it is distinct from the 102-kDa component detected in the anti-phosphotyrosine Western blots. The identity of the 102-kDa polypeptide was further investigated by dissecting the interactions among the components of the immune complex. The immune complex was isolated using FER2 antiserum and was denatured. The immunoprecipitated polypeptides were then subjected to a second round of immunoprecipitation using antiserum FER5, which we found to be able to recognize denatured FER (Fig. 5 C). Western blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies revealed that the 97–102-kDa doublet was retrieved by immunoprecipitation with FER5 antibodies (Fig. 5 A, lanes 1–4). Cortactin, which was co-immunoprecipitated by FER2, was not found in the FER5 immunoprecipitates, but was recovered in a subsequent immunoprecipitation with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (lanes 5 and 6). Dynamin, which was present in the original FER2 immunoprecipitates, was not recovered in any of the subsequent re-immunoprecipitations. Furthermore, the dynamin that was co-immunoprecipitated by the FER2 antibodies was not phosphorylated. These results rule out the possibility that dynamin is the 102-kDa phosphoprotein co-immunoprecipitating with FER. They also suggest that the 102-kDa polypeptide is closely related to FER or that its association with FER is mediated by a novel interaction, which is resistant to denaturation. To help analyze the functional implication of the FER-cortactin interaction, we prepared an enzymatically inactive FER by introducing a point mutation in the conserved lysine (Lys591) of the predicted ATP binding site of the kinase. Transient expression of the K591R FER mutant cDNA showed that it encodes a polypeptide that is slightly larger than the endogenous FER kinase, as a result of the addition of an HA epitope tag to the amino terminus (Fig. 6, A and B). In an immune complex kinase assay, the lysate of cells transfected with the K591R mutant showed no autophosphorylation of the mutant FER protein and reduced autophosphorylation of the endogenous kinase (C, lane 6). In contrast, transfection with an analogous wild-type FER cDNA resulted in a significant autophosphorylation of the tagged kinase (C, lane 5). These results suggest that the K591R FER protein may function as a dominant interfering mutant. To assess the effect of the K591R FER mutant on pp120 and cortactin phosphorylation, we cotransfected 293 cells with cDNA encoding CSF-1 receptor and mutant or wild-type FER. It was shown previously that the tyrosine phosphorylation of pp120 and cortactin is also regulated by the CSF-1 receptor (26Downing J.R. Reynolds A.B. Oncogene. 1991; 6: 607-613PubMed Google Scholar). S100 fractions of transfected cells were immunoprecipitated with FER antisera. Antiserum FER1 immunoprecipitated a complex mixture of endogenous and tagged FER proteins, as well as a small amount of pp120 (Fig. 7). Whereas the anti-phosphotyrosine blot revealed the presence of multiple bands of 97–102 kDa in the wild-type FER immunoprecipitates, there was considerably less heterogeneity in the case of cells transfected with the K591R mutant (A and B, lanes 3 and 4). Similarly, the anti-FER2 immunoprecipitates contained a complex mixture of FER proteins and cortactin (lanes 5–8). The anti-phosphotyrosine blot revealed that expression of the K591R FER mutant resulted in a significant reduction in the tyrosine phosphorylation of cortactin (A, lanes 7 and 8). The effect of the FER mutant on cortactin phosphorylation was further ascertained by analyzing immunoprecipitates obtained with anti-cortactin antibodies. As shown with the FER2 antibodies, immunoprecipitation with anti-cortactin antibodies clearly demonstrated the association of FER and cortactin (Fig. 8 A). In cells co-expressing the CSF-1 receptor and wild-type FER, M-CSF treatment resulted in an increase in phosphorylation of both FER and cortactin (Fig. 8 A, lanes 1 and 2). In contrast, expression of the K591R FER mutant resulted in a marked reduction of both basal and factor-dependent phosphorylation of cortactin (lanes 3 and 4). It is noteworthy that the mutant FER did not show any impairment in its association with cortactin. Examination of the FER polypeptides in the anti-cortactin immunoprecipitates clearly shows the mobility differences of the wild-type and mutant FER products. We also further verified the effect of the FER mutant on pp120 phosphorylation by immunoprecipitating P100 fractions using anti-pp120 antibodies. As shown previously, epithelial cells such as 293 cells express a heterogeneous mixture of pp120 isoforms (22Reynolds A.B. Daniel J. McCrea P. Wheelock M.J. Zhang Z. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 8333-8342Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). There was no difference in the extent of pp120 phosphorylation in cells expressing wild-type or K591R mutant FER. We previously demonstrated the stable association of FER with the catenin pp120 and estimated that no more than 10–15% of the total FER protein was involved in that complex (10Kim L. Wong T.W. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 4553-4561Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). As shown in the subcellular fractionation studies here, that previous estimate is consistent with the abundance of FER that is associated with the membrane fraction. The use of subcellular fractionation and the FER2 antiserum permitted the identification of a novel interaction between FER and the cytoskeletal protein cortactin. Immunoprecipitation of FER resulted in the coprecipitation of either cortactin or pp120, but not both. Thus, FER appears to interact with pp120 and cortactin in a mutually exclusive manner, although binding to the two polypeptides requires distinct FER sequences. These observations suggest that the FER·pp120 and FER-cortactin complexes may be involved in different signaling function. The FER-cortactin complex is detectable in a cytosolic fraction, but not in a lysate prepared using detergent-containing buffers. The association was verified by functional and structural analyses using independent assays and is therefore unlikely to be an artifact of the lysis procedure. The FER-cortactin association is unambiguously demonstrated by immunofluorescence colocalization in the membrane ruffles of PDGF-treated cells. Most significantly, the effect of the FER K591R mutant on cortactin phosphorylation strongly supports a direct physical interaction between the two proteins. We therefore believe that the interaction involves cytoskeletal structures that are detergent insoluble. Our analyses suggest that between 10 and 0% of the cellular cortactin is associated with FER. In addition to cortactin, we identified also a novel 102-kDa polypeptide that co-immunoprecipitated with FER. We recently showed that cortactin interacts with dynamin 2, which has an apparent molecular mass of ∼100 kDa. 2M. McNiven, L. Kim, and T. W. Wong, manuscript in preparation. Our analyses showed that dynamin could be detected in immunoprecipitates prepared with anti-FER antibodies, presumably by virtue of the interaction of FER with cortactin. However, the results also clearly showed that the 102-kDa polypeptide is distinct from dynamin. The ability of the FER5 antiserum to recover both the 97-kDa FER and the 102-kDa polypeptide under denaturing conditions suggests that the latter is a highly modified form of FER or a closely related polypeptide. As is evident in the transient expression assays, there is a pronounced size heterogeneity in the cytosolic pool of wild-type FER protein. The fact that the size heterogeneity is absent in the case of the FER mutant suggests that it is dependent on FER kinase activity. It therefore seems plausible that the 102-kDa polypeptide may be a highly phosphorylated form of FER that is present in such low abundance as to be undetectable by Western blotting with anti-FER antibodies. The functional significance of this polypeptide, and its selective localization in the cytosol, remain to be investigated further. In vitro binding assays demonstrated that the SH2 sequence of FER is capable of directly binding cortactin. This contrasts with our previous finding that the coiled coil sequence at the amino terminus of FER is required for binding pp120 (10Kim L. Wong T.W. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 4553-4561Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar). Expression of the FER K591R mutant was found to result in an inhibition of the autophosphorylation of the endogenous FER kinase, thus suggesting that the mutant was capable of functioning in a dominant interfering manner. The FER mutation has no apparent effect on its ability to interact with cortactin and pp120, and expression of the FER mutant has no effect on the expression of the two cytoskeletal proteins (data not shown). The mutation did result in an inhibition of the tyrosine phosphorylation of cortactin, but not of pp120, in response to growth factor receptor signaling. These data argue that cortactin, but not pp120, is a direct substrate of FER kinase. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that a residual amount of endogenous FER activity is sufficient to effect the phosphorylation of pp120. It should be noted that we have never been able to demonstrate a direct binding between FER and pp120. Recently, peptide libraries were used to determine the substrate specificity of protein tyrosine kinases (27Songyang Z. Carraway III, K.L. Eck M.J. Harrison S.C. Feldman R.A. Mohammadi M. Schlessinger J. Hubbard S.R. Smith D.P. Eng C. Lorenzo M.J. Ponder B.A.J. Mayer B.J. Cantley L.C. Nature. 1995; 373: 536-539Crossref PubMed Scopus (848) Google Scholar). Such analyses led to the conclusion that nonreceptor tyrosine kinases tend to phosphorylate peptide sequences that are recognized by their SH2 domains. Our observations on the FER-cortactin interaction and their putative enzyme-substrate relationship would be consistent with the specificity proposed on the basis of the peptide substrate analyses. Most significantly, our data suggest that the regulation of cortactin phosphorylation by growth factor receptors may be mediated in part by FER. Although cortactin was originally identified as a target of tyrosine phosphorylation by v-Src, a role for c-Src in cortactin phosphorylation has not been established. The subcellular localization of c-Src to endosomal membranes suggests that c-Src and cortactin are localized to different cellular compartments (28Kaplan K.B. Swedlow J.R. Varmus H.E. Morgan D.O. J. Cell Biol. 1992; 118: 321-333Crossref PubMed Scopus (202) Google Scholar). In addition to v-Src and FER, the cytoplasmic kinase FYN has also been implicated in the regulation of cortactin phosphorylation (29Calautti E. Missero C. Stein P.L. Ezzell R.M. Dotto G.P. Genes Dev. 1995; 9: 2279-2291Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar). It is therefore plausible that cortactin may be a substrate of multiple tyrosine kinases that serve to relay different extracellular signals. The significant basal phosphorylation of cortactin may be carried out by an unidentified tyrosine kinase. The partial phosphorylation allows cortactin to bind FER, and the FER-cortactin complex becomes a subject of regulation by growth factor signaling. The localization of cortactin to the cortical cytoskeleton, and its affinity for filamentous actin, led to the suggestion that cortactin may be involved in transmitting signals from the membrane to the actin cytoskeleton. That proposal is further substantiated by the observation that cortactin phosphorylation is induced upon integrin signaling in cell adhesion and in the cytoskeletal reorganization that accompanies bacterial entry of epithelial cells (30Vuori K. Ruoslahti E. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 22259-22262Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (269) Google Scholar, 31Dehio C. Prevost M.-C. Sansonetti P.J. EMBO J. 1995; 14: 2471-2482Crossref PubMed Scopus (163) Google Scholar). Recently, cortactin was shown to cross-link F-actin in vitro, and the cross-linking activity was down-regulated by the tyrosine phosphorylation of cortactin (32Huang C. Ni Y. Wang T. Gao Y. Haudenschild C.C. Zhan X. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 13911-13915Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar). These observations have consolidated a role for and FER and cortactin in the transmission of signals for reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. We thank Dr. M. McNiven for the anti-dynamin antibodies." @default.
• W2001306989 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2001306989 creator A5002561348 @default.
• W2001306989 creator A5062736036 @default.
• W2001306989 date "1998-09-01" @default.
• W2001306989 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2001306989 title "Growth Factor-dependent Phosphorylation of the Actin-binding Protein Cortactin Is Mediated by the Cytoplasmic Tyrosine Kinase FER" @default.
• W2001306989 cites W1434160079 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W1520817333 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W1644644009 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W1965860054 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W1972659626 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W1997459814 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W1999673185 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W2006892275 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W2009582035 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W20218504 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W2024630630 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W2025018535 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W2026907934 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W2028691987 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W2063107082 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W2117372001 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W2122829982 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W2132888121 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W2172014045 @default.
• W2001306989 cites W938256215 @default.
• W2001306989 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.36.23542" @default.
• W2001306989 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9722593" @default.
• W2001306989 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2001306989 type Work @default.
• W2001306989 sameAs 2001306989 @default.
• W2001306989 citedByCount "91" @default.
• W2001306989 countsByYear W20013069892012 @default.
• W2001306989 countsByYear W20013069892013 @default.
• W2001306989 countsByYear W20013069892014 @default.
• W2001306989 countsByYear W20013069892015 @default.
• W2001306989 countsByYear W20013069892016 @default.
• W2001306989 countsByYear W20013069892017 @default.
• W2001306989 countsByYear W20013069892018 @default.
• W2001306989 countsByYear W20013069892019 @default.
• W2001306989 countsByYear W20013069892021 @default.
• W2001306989 countsByYear W20013069892022 @default.
• W2001306989 countsByYear W20013069892023 @default.
• W2001306989 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2001306989 hasAuthorship W2001306989A5002561348 @default.
• W2001306989 hasAuthorship W2001306989A5062736036 @default.
• W2001306989 hasBestOaLocation W20013069891 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C108636557 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C11960822 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C125705527 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C142669718 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C1491633281 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C190062978 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C2776000893 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C2776165026 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C2777553839 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C42362537 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C62478195 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C108636557 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C11960822 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C125705527 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C142669718 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C1491633281 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C185592680 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C190062978 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C2776000893 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C2776165026 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C2777553839 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C42362537 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C55493867 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C62478195 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C86803240 @default.
• W2001306989 hasConceptScore W2001306989C95444343 @default.
• W2001306989 hasIssue "36" @default.
• W2001306989 hasLocation W20013069891 @default.
• W2001306989 hasOpenAccess W2001306989 @default.
• W2001306989 hasPrimaryLocation W20013069891 @default.
• W2001306989 hasRelatedWork W1965860054 @default.
• W2001306989 hasRelatedWork W1966248035 @default.
• W2001306989 hasRelatedWork W1986202831 @default.
• W2001306989 hasRelatedWork W2052856905 @default.
• W2001306989 hasRelatedWork W2096032969 @default.
• W2001306989 hasRelatedWork W2302141181 @default.
• W2001306989 hasRelatedWork W2396496353 @default.
• W2001306989 hasRelatedWork W2400314201 @default.
• W2001306989 hasRelatedWork W4247927249 @default.
• W2001306989 hasRelatedWork W595521446 @default.
• W2001306989 hasVolume "273" @default.
• W2001306989 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2001306989 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2001306989 magId "2001306989" @default.
• W2001306989 workType "article" @default.