Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2001427963> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2001427963 endingPage "16" @default.
- W2001427963 startingPage "2" @default.
- W2001427963 abstract "Behavior intervention techniques which employ positive reinforcement are effective for promoting skill acquisition and reducing maladaptive behaviors among a wide variety of populations (Akin-Little, Eckert, Lovett & Little, 2004; Ellison, 1997; Lannie & McCurdy, 2007). For such strategies to work, effective must be identified. The most effective means for identifying is through the use of systematic preference and reinforcer assessments (Hagopian, Long, & Rush, 2004; Logan & Gast, 2001). Preference assessments are techniques designed to identify items that are preferred by an individual and thus may serve as reinforcers. However, preference assessments do not actually assess the reinforcing value of an item. A reinforcer assessment may be used following a preference assessment to determine whether or not a preferred item functions as a reinforcer. Reinforcer assessments are primarily utilized in research to assess the validity of a preference assessment approach, whereas preference assessments are widely used in both research and clinical practice (Hagopian et al., 2004; Logan & Gast, 2001). Current research indicates that reinforcers are widely used with the infant and toddler population. For example, legislative and policy making bodies clearly advocate for early intervention inclusive of children as young as 18 months or younger who exhibit delays in adaptive behavior, communication, and/or social-emotional skills (Chao, Bryan, Burstein,& Cevriye, 2006; Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 2004; Gresham, Beebe-Frankenberger, & MacMillan. 1999; Webster-Stratton & Reid, 2003). These children may be exposed to intensive intervention programs which often include significant reinforcement components. In addition, young children with feeding disorders typically participate in intensive feeding interventions that require the identification of preferred foods or items to increase food consumption (Piazza, Patel, Gulotta, Sevin, & Layer, 2003). Young children who exhibit early onset severe behaviors disorders (such as self-injurious behavior) are also placed in intensive behavioral programs designed to decrease severe problem behaviors while increasing appropriate communicative responses (Kurtz et al., 2003). Finally, typically functioning infants and toddlers are frequently exposed to reinforcement procedures. For example, reinforcement is often used to teach infants sign language (Thompson, Cotnoir-Bichelman, McKerchar, Tate, & Dancho, 2007; Thompson, McKerchnar, & Dancho, 2004), to enhance toilet training programs (Luxim, Christophersen, & Purvis, 1997), and to increase desirable behaviors in the preschool and daycare settings (Hanley, Cammilleri, Tiger & Ingvarsson, 2007; Layer, Hanley, Heal, & Tiger, 2008). Surprisingly, while the use of reinforcement is reported in many studies examining the effectiveness of intervention techniques with these populations, there is very little research on the validity of the assessment techniques used prior to the development of the intervention. It appears that many decisions are based on clinical judgment rather than empirical evidence. Without the knowledge or understanding of the idiosyncratic nature of the child's preference, we risk designing misaligned interventions during a critical period for the child (Kennedy, 2002). A large body of research describing valid and reliable techniques to effectively determine does exist for other populations such as the developmentally disabled (Hagopian et al., 2004; Logan & Gast, 2001). In fact, the majority of preference assessment techniques currently in use were originally designed for this population (e.g. DeLeon & Iwata, 1996; Fisher et al, 1992; Green et al., 1988; Roane, Vollmer, Ringdahl & Marcus, 1998; Windsor, Piche, & Locke, 1994). Identifying potential for the general education population has also received significant attention (e. …" @default.
- W2001427963 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2001427963 creator A5002098034 @default.
- W2001427963 creator A5035786617 @default.
- W2001427963 creator A5051558846 @default.
- W2001427963 date "2010-01-01" @default.
- W2001427963 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2001427963 title "Evaluation of preference assessment procedures for use with infants and toddlers." @default.
- W2001427963 cites W148773385 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W1534093642 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W1967953323 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W1974802753 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W1974853405 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W1977789450 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W1981854030 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W1986483508 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W1994450551 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W1997133598 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W1998237596 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2016089703 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2020890862 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2025891651 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2026347380 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2027494362 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2042450696 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2044847760 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2046512562 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2054686346 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2071103802 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2076956329 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2079899999 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2087051876 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2089149046 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2090930424 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2096924120 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2101328173 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2104731231 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2109660306 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2110569194 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2113968840 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2116128571 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2117659863 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2120531656 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2120781608 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2121426809 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2122422450 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2123443952 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2124066653 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2126102109 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2128475518 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2137794505 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2139777648 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2140536094 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2145610501 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2150280825 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2158403359 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2164157815 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W2345846897 @default.
- W2001427963 cites W73100275 @default.
- W2001427963 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100893" @default.
- W2001427963 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2001427963 type Work @default.
- W2001427963 sameAs 2001427963 @default.
- W2001427963 citedByCount "14" @default.
- W2001427963 countsByYear W20014279632013 @default.
- W2001427963 countsByYear W20014279632014 @default.
- W2001427963 countsByYear W20014279632015 @default.
- W2001427963 countsByYear W20014279632017 @default.
- W2001427963 countsByYear W20014279632020 @default.
- W2001427963 countsByYear W20014279632021 @default.
- W2001427963 countsByYear W20014279632022 @default.
- W2001427963 countsByYear W20014279632023 @default.
- W2001427963 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2001427963 hasAuthorship W2001427963A5002098034 @default.
- W2001427963 hasAuthorship W2001427963A5035786617 @default.
- W2001427963 hasAuthorship W2001427963A5051558846 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConcept C3018395757 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConceptScore W2001427963C127413603 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConceptScore W2001427963C138496976 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConceptScore W2001427963C15744967 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConceptScore W2001427963C162324750 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConceptScore W2001427963C175444787 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConceptScore W2001427963C180747234 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConceptScore W2001427963C200601418 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConceptScore W2001427963C2781249084 @default.
- W2001427963 hasConceptScore W2001427963C3018395757 @default.
- W2001427963 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2001427963 hasLocation W20014279631 @default.
- W2001427963 hasOpenAccess W2001427963 @default.
- W2001427963 hasPrimaryLocation W20014279631 @default.