FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2001472145> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2001472145 endingPage "179" @default.
• W2001472145 startingPage "174" @default.
• W2001472145 abstract "To investigate the use of “Control Point Analysis” (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL) to analyze and compare delivered volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for 3 different treatment planning complexity levels. A total of 30 patients were chosen and fully anonymized for the purpose of this study. Overall, 10 lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), 10 head-and-neck (H&N), and 10 prostate VMAT plans were generated on Pinnacle3 and delivered on a Varian linear accelerator (LINAC). The delivered dose was measured using ArcCHECK (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL). Each plan was analyzed using “Sun Nuclear Corporation (SNC) Patient 6” and “Control Point Analysis.” Gamma passing percentage was used to assess the differences between the measured and planned dose distributions and to assess the role of various control point binning combinations. Of the different sites considered, the prostate cases reported the highest gamma passing percentages calculated with “SNC Patient 6” (97.5% to 99.2% for the 3%, 3 mm) and “Control Point Analysis” (95.4% to 98.3% for the 3%, 3 mm). The mean percentage of passing control point sectors for the prostate cases increased from 51.8 ± 7.8% for individual control points to 70.6 ± 10.5% for 5 control points binned together to 87.8 ± 11.0% for 10 control points binned together (2%, 2-mm passing criteria). Overall, there was an increasing trend in the percentage of sectors passing gamma analysis with an increase in the number of control points binned together in a sector for both the gamma passing criteria (2%, 2 mm and 3%, 3 mm). Although many plans passed the clinical quality assurance criteria, plans involving the delivery of high Monitor Unit (MU)/control point (SBRT) and plans involving high degree of modulation (H&N) showed less delivery accuracy per control point compared with plans with low MU/control point and low degree of modulation (prostate)." @default.
• W2001472145 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2001472145 creator A5010040519 @default.
• W2001472145 creator A5031508148 @default.
• W2001472145 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2001472145 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2001472145 title "Control Point Analysis comparison for 3 different treatment planning and delivery complexity levels using a commercial 3-dimensional diode array" @default.
• W2001472145 cites W1967121735 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W1968671127 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W1973699401 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W1978430361 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W1992432638 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W2005626309 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W2021482893 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W2028604160 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W2029976261 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W2041980917 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W2050311003 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W2059570457 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W2068174639 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W2082213510 @default.
• W2001472145 cites W2084851290 @default.
• W2001472145 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2013.12.005" @default.
• W2001472145 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24480374" @default.
• W2001472145 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2001472145 type Work @default.
• W2001472145 sameAs 2001472145 @default.
• W2001472145 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2001472145 countsByYear W20014721452015 @default.
• W2001472145 countsByYear W20014721452017 @default.
• W2001472145 countsByYear W20014721452019 @default.
• W2001472145 countsByYear W20014721452020 @default.
• W2001472145 countsByYear W20014721452021 @default.
• W2001472145 countsByYear W20014721452022 @default.
• W2001472145 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2001472145 hasAuthorship W2001472145A5010040519 @default.
• W2001472145 hasAuthorship W2001472145A5031508148 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConcept C2777774050 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConceptScore W2001472145C141071460 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConceptScore W2001472145C201645570 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConceptScore W2001472145C2524010 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConceptScore W2001472145C2777774050 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConceptScore W2001472145C2989005 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConceptScore W2001472145C33923547 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConceptScore W2001472145C509974204 @default.
• W2001472145 hasConceptScore W2001472145C71924100 @default.
• W2001472145 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2001472145 hasLocation W20014721451 @default.
• W2001472145 hasLocation W20014721452 @default.
• W2001472145 hasOpenAccess W2001472145 @default.
• W2001472145 hasPrimaryLocation W20014721451 @default.
• W2001472145 hasRelatedWork W1587224694 @default.
• W2001472145 hasRelatedWork W1979597421 @default.
• W2001472145 hasRelatedWork W2003305474 @default.
• W2001472145 hasRelatedWork W2007980826 @default.
• W2001472145 hasRelatedWork W2041795146 @default.
• W2001472145 hasRelatedWork W2061531152 @default.
• W2001472145 hasRelatedWork W2077600819 @default.
• W2001472145 hasRelatedWork W3002753104 @default.
• W2001472145 hasRelatedWork W4225152035 @default.
• W2001472145 hasRelatedWork W4245490552 @default.
• W2001472145 hasVolume "39" @default.
• W2001472145 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2001472145 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2001472145 magId "2001472145" @default.
• W2001472145 workType "article" @default.