FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2001763150> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2001763150 endingPage "E380" @default.
• W2001763150 startingPage "E375" @default.
• W2001763150 abstract "In Brief Study Design. In vitro biomechanical analysis of different multilevel cervical fixation techniques. Objective. To compare the multilevel stability of a cervical anchored spacer (AS) with established fixation techniques. Summary of Background Data. To avoid plate-related complications, for example, dysphagia zero-profile AS has been developed. The use of these new zero-profile implants for treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease is widely accepted after encouraging biomechanical results for single-level instrumentation. However, there is only little knowledge about the biomechanical stability of these zero-profile devices in multilevel instrumentations. Methods. Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines (C3–C7) were nondestructively tested in a biomechanical 3-dimensional spine test setup. Segmental range of motion (ROM) under torsional load of 1.5 N·m was measured optoelectronically. Intact spine baseline measurement specimens were tested with 2- and 3-level instrumentation including (1) stand-alone PEEK-cage; (2) PEEK-cage plus locking plate; and (3) AS. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used for statistical analysis. Results. Comparison of baseline ROM and stand-alone PEEK-cage instrumentation showed a significant lower segmental ROM only for 2-level instrumentations. Cage plus plate and AS were able to reduce segmental ROM significantly (P < 0.05) in 2- and 3-level instrumentations. Comparing cage plus plate and AS, a significant lower ROM was detected for flexion/extension in 2- and 3-level instrumentation and for lateral bending in 2-level instrumentation using cage plus plate. Conclusion. Segmental stability decreases with the number of instrumented segments regardless of the used implant. Comparing the different fixation techniques biomechanically, the locking plate and cage construct was stiffer in all test modes than the anchored devices in multilevel constructs. However, it remains unclear what the clinical significance may be. Level of Evidence: N/A This article evaluates the in vitro stability of a cervical anchored-spacer in comparison with established fixation techniques. Biomechanically, the locking plate and cage construct was stiffer in all test modes than the anchored devices in multilevel constructs. However, it remains unclear what the clinical significance may be." @default.
• W2001763150 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2001763150 creator A5010772908 @default.
• W2001763150 creator A5052460459 @default.
• W2001763150 creator A5063790209 @default.
• W2001763150 creator A5083747108 @default.
• W2001763150 date "2015-04-01" @default.
• W2001763150 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2001763150 title "A Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer in Multilevel Cervical Anterior Interbody Fusion" @default.
• W2001763150 cites W1537185790 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2003034113 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2009946444 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2009987460 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2024272228 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2025136281 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2036146314 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2044274422 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2045499911 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2058688479 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2058924923 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2067038992 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2075058826 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2075734005 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2080250604 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2094267902 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2101070887 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2116331178 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2122812892 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2142641998 @default.
• W2001763150 cites W2145845814 @default.
• W2001763150 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000768" @default.
• W2001763150 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25584947" @default.
• W2001763150 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2001763150 type Work @default.
• W2001763150 sameAs 2001763150 @default.
• W2001763150 citedByCount "47" @default.
• W2001763150 countsByYear W20017631502016 @default.
• W2001763150 countsByYear W20017631502017 @default.
• W2001763150 countsByYear W20017631502018 @default.
• W2001763150 countsByYear W20017631502019 @default.
• W2001763150 countsByYear W20017631502020 @default.
• W2001763150 countsByYear W20017631502021 @default.
• W2001763150 countsByYear W20017631502022 @default.
• W2001763150 countsByYear W20017631502023 @default.
• W2001763150 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2001763150 hasAuthorship W2001763150A5010772908 @default.
• W2001763150 hasAuthorship W2001763150A5052460459 @default.
• W2001763150 hasAuthorship W2001763150A5063790209 @default.
• W2001763150 hasAuthorship W2001763150A5083747108 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C118530786 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C160272327 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C170700871 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C2781430139 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C2985379065 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C521977710 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C7660682 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C105702510 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C111919701 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C118530786 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C127413603 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C136229726 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C141071460 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C146249460 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C159985019 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C160272327 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C170700871 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C175696284 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C192562407 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C2781411149 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C2781430139 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C2908647359 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C29694066 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C2985379065 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C41008148 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C521977710 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C60465272 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C66938386 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C71924100 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C7660682 @default.
• W2001763150 hasConceptScore W2001763150C99454951 @default.
• W2001763150 hasIssue "7" @default.

• next