FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2001780557> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2001780557 endingPage "1386" @default.
• W2001780557 startingPage "1380" @default.
• W2001780557 abstract "PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the loop security of arthroscopic sliding knots when tension is only applied to the post strand and not the loop strand.MethodsSix different locking sliding knots (Weston, Nicky, Roeder, SMC, San Diego, and Dines) were included. Loop securities were evaluated in 2 ways: with a conventional method (equal tension applied to the suture loop) and with a worst-case scenario (WCS) method (only the post strand of the suture loop was tensioned). Differences between test methods were evaluated for significance. To help assess the applicability of each test method, loop-security testing in a cadaveric shoulder was performed with 1 type of knot (SMC).ResultsLoop securities with the conventional method versus the WCS method were as follows: 10.74 ± 4.20 N versus 6.90 ± 3.90 N for Weston, 21.25 ± 14.74 N versus 8.73 ± 3.35 N for Nicky, 26.14 ± 15.57 N versus 7.95 ± 4.23 N for Roeder, 42.67 ± 22.96 N versus 8.67 ± 4.33 N for SMC, 52.99 ± 21.36 N versus 18.25 ± 10.58 N for San Diego, and 89.27 ± 27.96 N versus 12.48 ± 3.40 N for Dines (P < .05 for each knot). All knots failed at significantly lower loads when the suture loop was not evenly tensioned. Cadaveric testing (SMC) resulted in a loop security of 5.53 ± 6.06 N, which was similar to the WCS setting.ConclusionsThe locking mechanism of the sliding knots is maintained when the suture loop is evenly tensioned at both post and non-post strands. When tension is not applied to the non-post strand side, the knots slide more easily and fail at lower loads than previously reported.Clinical RelevanceWhen surgeons tie locking sliding knots in single-row rotator cuff repair, they should be aware that the knots could fail at much lower loads than previously reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the loop security of arthroscopic sliding knots when tension is only applied to the post strand and not the loop strand. Six different locking sliding knots (Weston, Nicky, Roeder, SMC, San Diego, and Dines) were included. Loop securities were evaluated in 2 ways: with a conventional method (equal tension applied to the suture loop) and with a worst-case scenario (WCS) method (only the post strand of the suture loop was tensioned). Differences between test methods were evaluated for significance. To help assess the applicability of each test method, loop-security testing in a cadaveric shoulder was performed with 1 type of knot (SMC). Loop securities with the conventional method versus the WCS method were as follows: 10.74 ± 4.20 N versus 6.90 ± 3.90 N for Weston, 21.25 ± 14.74 N versus 8.73 ± 3.35 N for Nicky, 26.14 ± 15.57 N versus 7.95 ± 4.23 N for Roeder, 42.67 ± 22.96 N versus 8.67 ± 4.33 N for SMC, 52.99 ± 21.36 N versus 18.25 ± 10.58 N for San Diego, and 89.27 ± 27.96 N versus 12.48 ± 3.40 N for Dines (P < .05 for each knot). All knots failed at significantly lower loads when the suture loop was not evenly tensioned. Cadaveric testing (SMC) resulted in a loop security of 5.53 ± 6.06 N, which was similar to the WCS setting. The locking mechanism of the sliding knots is maintained when the suture loop is evenly tensioned at both post and non-post strands. When tension is not applied to the non-post strand side, the knots slide more easily and fail at lower loads than previously reported." @default.
• W2001780557 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2001780557 creator A5012179692 @default.
• W2001780557 creator A5014068994 @default.
• W2001780557 creator A5020781989 @default.
• W2001780557 creator A5031695731 @default.
• W2001780557 creator A5033286666 @default.
• W2001780557 creator A5053852050 @default.
• W2001780557 creator A5090025679 @default.
• W2001780557 date "2013-08-01" @default.
• W2001780557 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2001780557 title "Loop Securities of Arthroscopic Sliding-Knot Techniques When the Suture Loop Is Not Evenly Tensioned" @default.
• W2001780557 cites W1976215926 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W1977560776 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2004016978 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2009556230 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2029789098 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2031574019 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2032882796 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2039962870 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2053220483 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2064951370 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2066667382 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2072462282 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2094390372 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2101445934 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W2222877514 @default.
• W2001780557 cites W1973919015 @default.
• W2001780557 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.05.013" @default.
• W2001780557 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23906277" @default.
• W2001780557 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2001780557 type Work @default.
• W2001780557 sameAs 2001780557 @default.
• W2001780557 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2001780557 countsByYear W20017805572016 @default.
• W2001780557 countsByYear W20017805572017 @default.
• W2001780557 countsByYear W20017805572018 @default.
• W2001780557 countsByYear W20017805572019 @default.
• W2001780557 countsByYear W20017805572020 @default.
• W2001780557 countsByYear W20017805572021 @default.
• W2001780557 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2001780557 hasAuthorship W2001780557A5012179692 @default.
• W2001780557 hasAuthorship W2001780557A5014068994 @default.
• W2001780557 hasAuthorship W2001780557A5020781989 @default.
• W2001780557 hasAuthorship W2001780557A5031695731 @default.
• W2001780557 hasAuthorship W2001780557A5033286666 @default.
• W2001780557 hasAuthorship W2001780557A5053852050 @default.
• W2001780557 hasAuthorship W2001780557A5090025679 @default.
• W2001780557 hasBestOaLocation W20017805571 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConcept C184670325 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConcept C2779863119 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConceptScore W2001780557C105702510 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConceptScore W2001780557C114614502 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConceptScore W2001780557C141071460 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConceptScore W2001780557C159985019 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConceptScore W2001780557C175696284 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConceptScore W2001780557C184670325 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConceptScore W2001780557C192562407 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConceptScore W2001780557C2777327002 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConceptScore W2001780557C2779863119 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConceptScore W2001780557C33923547 @default.
• W2001780557 hasConceptScore W2001780557C71924100 @default.
• W2001780557 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2001780557 hasLocation W20017805571 @default.
• W2001780557 hasLocation W20017805572 @default.
• W2001780557 hasOpenAccess W2001780557 @default.
• W2001780557 hasPrimaryLocation W20017805571 @default.
• W2001780557 hasRelatedWork W1995412879 @default.
• W2001780557 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2001780557 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2001780557 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2001780557 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2001780557 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2001780557 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2001780557 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2001780557 hasRelatedWork W4301489211 @default.
• W2001780557 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2001780557 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W2001780557 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2001780557 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2001780557 magId "2001780557" @default.
• W2001780557 workType "article" @default.