FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2002003969> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2002003969 endingPage "135" @default.
• W2002003969 startingPage "134" @default.
• W2002003969 abstract "Nurses need to be informed about the patient's pain to be able to take appropriate measures to alleviate pain. However, communication, assessment, and documentation of pain by nurses is often a problem for hospitalized patients. In this study we aimed to overcome the main barriers by developing, implementing, and evaluating a Pain Monitoring Program (PMP) for nurses. The PMP consists of two components: educating nurses about pain, pain assessment and pain management; and implementing daily pain assessment by means of a numeric rating scale. We describe the effects of the PMP on communication about pain between nurses and patients and between physicians and patients, agreement between patients' pain intensity and nurses estimations of patients' pain intensity, and documentation about pain in the nursing records. Factors that might influence communication, assessment, and documentation are also discussed. The effects of the PMP were measured in a quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group. In total, 703 patients participated: 358 patients in the control group and 345 in the intervention group. Results of the control group showed that communication about pain between nurses and patients, agreement between patients' and nurses pain ratings, and documentation about pain in nursing records, remain inadequate. Patients' pain intensity and age were related to communication, assessment, and documentation. Communication and documentation is better in patients with moderate to severe pain than in patients with mild pain, and assessment is better in patients with mild pain. Older patients communicate less with nurses and physicians about pain, and nurses document less about pain in nursing records for older patients compared with younger patients. The PMP proved to be effective in improving nurses' assessment of patients' pain and documentation about pain in nursing records. Patients' pain intensity and care setting were related to the efficacy of the PMP. Communication about pain between patients and nurses, and between patients and physicians did not improve as a result of the PMP. Based on this study it can be concluded that in using a simple method such as the numeric rating scale, together with an education program, attention is focused in a systematic way on patients' pain complaints and creates a common language between patients and nurses. Because the PMP proved effective in a heterogenous population in multiple care settings, it is recommended to implement the PMP in nursing practice." @default.
• W2002003969 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2002003969 creator A5002687564 @default.
• W2002003969 date "1998-04-01" @default.
• W2002003969 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2002003969 title "Nursing documentation across the continuum" @default.
• W2002003969 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1043-4542(98)90063-7" @default.
• W2002003969 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2002003969 type Work @default.
• W2002003969 sameAs 2002003969 @default.
• W2002003969 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2002003969 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2002003969 hasAuthorship W2002003969A5002687564 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C2778282284 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C2778815017 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C2780813765 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C2910154007 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C2983098980 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C2984889486 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C159110408 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C17744445 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C1862650 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C199360897 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C199539241 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C2778282284 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C2778815017 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C2779473830 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C2780813765 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C2910154007 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C2983098980 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C2984889486 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C41008148 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C56666940 @default.
• W2002003969 hasConceptScore W2002003969C71924100 @default.
• W2002003969 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2002003969 hasLocation W20020039691 @default.
• W2002003969 hasOpenAccess W2002003969 @default.
• W2002003969 hasPrimaryLocation W20020039691 @default.
• W2002003969 hasRelatedWork W1584147244 @default.
• W2002003969 hasRelatedWork W2016231886 @default.
• W2002003969 hasRelatedWork W2042308053 @default.
• W2002003969 hasRelatedWork W2233857945 @default.
• W2002003969 hasRelatedWork W2414387693 @default.
• W2002003969 hasRelatedWork W2419467710 @default.
• W2002003969 hasRelatedWork W2901009702 @default.
• W2002003969 hasRelatedWork W3027692034 @default.
• W2002003969 hasRelatedWork W3107256144 @default.
• W2002003969 hasRelatedWork W3163960961 @default.
• W2002003969 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W2002003969 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2002003969 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2002003969 magId "2002003969" @default.
• W2002003969 workType "article" @default.