Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2002022249> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2002022249 endingPage "2760" @default.
- W2002022249 startingPage "2758" @default.
- W2002022249 abstract "ObjectiveTo compare robot assisted laparoscopic platform to standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis.DesignA retrospective cohort controlled study.SettingTertiary referral center.Patient(s)Seventy-eight reproductive aged women.Intervention(s)Robot assisted or standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis between January 2008 and January 2009.Main Outcome Measure(s)Operative time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization time, intraoperative and postoperative complications.Result(s)Seventy-eight patients underwent treatment of endometriosis, 40 by robot assisted laparoscopy and 38 by standard laparoscopy. The two groups were matched for age, body mass index (BMI), stage of endometriosis, and previous abdominal surgery. Mean operative time with the robot was 191 minutes (range 135–295 minutes) compared with 159 minutes (range 85–320 minutes) during standard laparoscopy. There were no significant differences in blood loss, hospitalization, intraoperative or postoperative complications. There were no conversions to laparotomy.Conclusion(s)Both robot assisted laparoscopic and standard laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis have excellent outcomes. The robotic technique required significantly longer surgical and anesthesia time, as well as larger trocars. To compare robot assisted laparoscopic platform to standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. A retrospective cohort controlled study. Tertiary referral center. Seventy-eight reproductive aged women. Robot assisted or standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis between January 2008 and January 2009. Operative time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Seventy-eight patients underwent treatment of endometriosis, 40 by robot assisted laparoscopy and 38 by standard laparoscopy. The two groups were matched for age, body mass index (BMI), stage of endometriosis, and previous abdominal surgery. Mean operative time with the robot was 191 minutes (range 135–295 minutes) compared with 159 minutes (range 85–320 minutes) during standard laparoscopy. There were no significant differences in blood loss, hospitalization, intraoperative or postoperative complications. There were no conversions to laparotomy. Both robot assisted laparoscopic and standard laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis have excellent outcomes. The robotic technique required significantly longer surgical and anesthesia time, as well as larger trocars." @default.
- W2002022249 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2002022249 creator A5010639886 @default.
- W2002022249 creator A5013079849 @default.
- W2002022249 creator A5019086304 @default.
- W2002022249 creator A5040911056 @default.
- W2002022249 creator A5043926735 @default.
- W2002022249 creator A5060906749 @default.
- W2002022249 creator A5078419468 @default.
- W2002022249 date "2010-12-01" @default.
- W2002022249 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2002022249 title "Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis" @default.
- W2002022249 cites W1573087592 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W185135288 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W1968149088 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W1971166421 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W1973124048 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W1975900052 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W1984803497 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W1994819430 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W2002334279 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W2018270528 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W2021836466 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W2033474738 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W2046377234 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W2074665453 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W2074862128 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W2077814317 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W2086114548 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W2087256467 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W2170308691 @default.
- W2002022249 cites W62574886 @default.
- W2002022249 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.031" @default.
- W2002022249 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20537632" @default.
- W2002022249 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2002022249 type Work @default.
- W2002022249 sameAs 2002022249 @default.
- W2002022249 citedByCount "114" @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492012 @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492013 @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492014 @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492015 @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492016 @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492017 @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492018 @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492019 @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492020 @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492021 @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492022 @default.
- W2002022249 countsByYear W20020222492023 @default.
- W2002022249 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2002022249 hasAuthorship W2002022249A5010639886 @default.
- W2002022249 hasAuthorship W2002022249A5013079849 @default.
- W2002022249 hasAuthorship W2002022249A5019086304 @default.
- W2002022249 hasAuthorship W2002022249A5040911056 @default.
- W2002022249 hasAuthorship W2002022249A5043926735 @default.
- W2002022249 hasAuthorship W2002022249A5060906749 @default.
- W2002022249 hasAuthorship W2002022249A5078419468 @default.
- W2002022249 hasBestOaLocation W20020222491 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConcept C2779522080 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConcept C2780778865 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConcept C2991743468 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConceptScore W2002022249C126322002 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConceptScore W2002022249C141071460 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConceptScore W2002022249C167135981 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConceptScore W2002022249C2779522080 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConceptScore W2002022249C2780047204 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConceptScore W2002022249C2780221984 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConceptScore W2002022249C2780778865 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConceptScore W2002022249C29456083 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConceptScore W2002022249C2991743468 @default.
- W2002022249 hasConceptScore W2002022249C71924100 @default.
- W2002022249 hasIssue "7" @default.
- W2002022249 hasLocation W20020222491 @default.
- W2002022249 hasLocation W20020222492 @default.
- W2002022249 hasOpenAccess W2002022249 @default.
- W2002022249 hasPrimaryLocation W20020222491 @default.
- W2002022249 hasRelatedWork W1820398927 @default.
- W2002022249 hasRelatedWork W190587926 @default.
- W2002022249 hasRelatedWork W1976624284 @default.
- W2002022249 hasRelatedWork W1993631639 @default.
- W2002022249 hasRelatedWork W2163354096 @default.
- W2002022249 hasRelatedWork W2355262143 @default.
- W2002022249 hasRelatedWork W2360268570 @default.
- W2002022249 hasRelatedWork W2365982454 @default.
- W2002022249 hasRelatedWork W2417628092 @default.
- W2002022249 hasRelatedWork W2418341139 @default.
- W2002022249 hasVolume "94" @default.
- W2002022249 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2002022249 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2002022249 magId "2002022249" @default.