FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2002175095> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2002175095 endingPage "263" @default.
• W2002175095 startingPage "250" @default.
• W2002175095 abstract "Abstract Six examples are used to illustrate the potential for application-oriented landscape research in bridging human and natural sciences. The paper therefore examines: (i) uncertainty, (ii) data modelling, (iii) the role of scenarios, (iv) the use of process-oriented and participatory methods, (v) the development of an integrative framework. On the way from “data to decision” we start with data uncertainty in spatially explicit data. An assessment of critical loads in Southwest Germany in different spatial scales is examplified, and landscape research should make these data properties as clear and transparent as possible, e.g. with probability maps. In a next step, data modeling techniques like neural nets in a Geographical Information System (GIS) can improve the availability of maps and therefore spatial data—in our second case study we elaborated a synthetic soil map in the German region Hohenlohe out of various other data like geomorphology and elevation, as well as a reference soil map in an adjacent area. This shows how we can better exploit already existing data with new techniques. The third case study continues with genetic algorithms in order to predict the occurrence of species and habitats (here: heathlands) in the Hohenlohe area in Germany, and hence showing further techniques as well as methods in creating potentials and scenarios. How scenarios can be used to translate options from science to society in order to find a future as well as its implications for a landscape is shown in a next case study. Due to general complexity, we finally suggest to use indicators. On top of that, we developed an Information System to run scenarios for future land use in a municipality, and assess indicator values depending on the envisaged future. The Information System was then used in a participatory process, based in our case on a method from social science, in order to achieve high involvement and acceptance of people for decision making. The final step from data to decision is the development of an integrative framework, which we call Environmental Impact Assessment Multi-level Approach. We conclude that under such a framework it should be easier to bridge gaps between human and natural sciences for an application-oriented landscape research." @default.
• W2002175095 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2002175095 creator A5045641366 @default.
• W2002175095 creator A5087543206 @default.
• W2002175095 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W2002175095 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2002175095 title "From data to decisions" @default.
• W2002175095 cites W103290195 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W143850130 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W1965637109 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W1988898398 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W1992690287 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W1999031666 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2029338894 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2035323729 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2038391454 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2079436209 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2086390337 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2098761100 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2139045605 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2152809415 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2170500839 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2261287692 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W230344805 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2310779116 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2316010510 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2476400805 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W2486291793 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W656002659 @default.
• W2002175095 cites W91615099 @default.
• W2002175095 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.012" @default.
• W2002175095 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2002175095 type Work @default.
• W2002175095 sameAs 2002175095 @default.
• W2002175095 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2002175095 countsByYear W20021750952012 @default.
• W2002175095 countsByYear W20021750952013 @default.
• W2002175095 countsByYear W20021750952015 @default.
• W2002175095 countsByYear W20021750952017 @default.
• W2002175095 countsByYear W20021750952018 @default.
• W2002175095 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2002175095 hasAuthorship W2002175095A5045641366 @default.
• W2002175095 hasAuthorship W2002175095A5087543206 @default.
• W2002175095 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2002175095 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2002175095 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2002175095 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2002175095 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2002175095 hasConceptScore W2002175095C107826830 @default.
• W2002175095 hasConceptScore W2002175095C205649164 @default.
• W2002175095 hasConceptScore W2002175095C2522767166 @default.
• W2002175095 hasConceptScore W2002175095C39432304 @default.
• W2002175095 hasConceptScore W2002175095C41008148 @default.
• W2002175095 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2002175095 hasLocation W20021750951 @default.
• W2002175095 hasOpenAccess W2002175095 @default.
• W2002175095 hasPrimaryLocation W20021750951 @default.
• W2002175095 hasRelatedWork W2364080365 @default.
• W2002175095 hasRelatedWork W2564303933 @default.
• W2002175095 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2002175095 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2002175095 hasRelatedWork W3179678468 @default.
• W2002175095 hasRelatedWork W4225531942 @default.
• W2002175095 hasRelatedWork W4247880953 @default.
• W2002175095 hasRelatedWork W891401171 @default.
• W2002175095 hasRelatedWork W107326278 @default.
• W2002175095 hasRelatedWork W2273831181 @default.
• W2002175095 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W2002175095 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2002175095 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2002175095 magId "2002175095" @default.
• W2002175095 workType "article" @default.