FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2002181014> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2002181014 endingPage "2809" @default.
• W2002181014 startingPage "2798" @default.
• W2002181014 abstract "A spaceborne lidar mission could serve multiple scientific purposes including remote sensing of ecosystem structure, carbon storage, terrestrial topography and ice sheet monitoring. The measurement requirements of these different goals will require compromises in sensor design. Footprint diameters that would be larger than optimal for vegetation studies have been proposed. Some spaceborne lidar mission designs include the possibility that a lidar sensor would share a platform with another sensor, which might require off-nadir pointing at angles of up to 16°. To resolve multiple mission goals and sensor requirements, detailed knowledge of the sensitivity of sensor performance to these aspects of mission design is required. This research used a radiative transfer model to investigate the sensitivity of forest height estimates to footprint diameter, off-nadir pointing and their interaction over a range of forest canopy properties. An individual-based forest model was used to simulate stands of mixed conifer forest in the Tahoe National Forest (Northern California, USA) and stands of deciduous forests in the Bartlett Experimental Forest (New Hampshire, USA). Waveforms were simulated for stands generated by a forest succession model using footprint diameters of 20 m to 70 m. Off-nadir angles of 0 to 16° were considered for a 25 m diameter footprint diameter. Footprint diameters in the range of 25 m to 30 m were optimal for estimates of maximum forest height (R2 of 0.95 and RMSE of 3 m). As expected, the contribution of vegetation height to the vertical extent of the waveform decreased with larger footprints, while the contribution of terrain slope increased. Precision of estimates decreased with an increasing off-nadir pointing angle, but off-nadir pointing had less impact on height estimates in deciduous forests than in coniferous forests. When pointing off-nadir, the decrease in precision was dependent on local incidence angle (the angle between the off-nadir beam and a line normal to the terrain surface) which is dependent on the off-nadir pointing angle, terrain slope, and the difference between the laser pointing azimuth and terrain aspect; the effect was larger when the sensor was aligned with the terrain azimuth but when aspect and azimuth are opposed, there was virtually no effect on R2 or RMSE. A second effect of off-nadir pointing is that the laser beam will intersect individual crowns and the canopy as a whole from a different angle which had a distinct effect on the precision of lidar estimates of height, decreasing R2 and increasing RMSE, although the effect was most pronounced for coniferous crowns." @default.
• W2002181014 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2002181014 creator A5013327000 @default.
• W2002181014 creator A5025553015 @default.
• W2002181014 creator A5072039495 @default.
• W2002181014 creator A5080616577 @default.
• W2002181014 date "2011-11-01" @default.
• W2002181014 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2002181014 title "Impact of footprint diameter and off-nadir pointing on the precision of canopy height estimates from spaceborne lidar" @default.
• W2002181014 cites W1964759162 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W1977615264 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W1980403882 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2013302527 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2035100408 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2040461702 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2050966212 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2117446220 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2130287574 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2131258618 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2131408559 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2132926714 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2143946036 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2146756792 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2155698916 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2160203024 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2160454972 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2171466305 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W2273297058 @default.
• W2002181014 cites W4256096524 @default.
• W2002181014 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.08.025" @default.
• W2002181014 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2002181014 type Work @default.
• W2002181014 sameAs 2002181014 @default.
• W2002181014 citedByCount "54" @default.
• W2002181014 countsByYear W20021810142012 @default.
• W2002181014 countsByYear W20021810142013 @default.
• W2002181014 countsByYear W20021810142014 @default.
• W2002181014 countsByYear W20021810142015 @default.
• W2002181014 countsByYear W20021810142016 @default.
• W2002181014 countsByYear W20021810142017 @default.
• W2002181014 countsByYear W20021810142018 @default.
• W2002181014 countsByYear W20021810142019 @default.
• W2002181014 countsByYear W20021810142020 @default.
• W2002181014 countsByYear W20021810142021 @default.
• W2002181014 countsByYear W20021810142022 @default.
• W2002181014 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2002181014 hasAuthorship W2002181014A5013327000 @default.
• W2002181014 hasAuthorship W2002181014A5025553015 @default.
• W2002181014 hasAuthorship W2002181014A5072039495 @default.
• W2002181014 hasAuthorship W2002181014A5080616577 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C101000010 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C132943942 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C17534553 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C19269812 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C204323151 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C21200559 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C24326235 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C2776133958 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C39807119 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C51399673 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C62649853 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConcept C88575799 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C101000010 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C127313418 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C127413603 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C132943942 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C142724271 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C146978453 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C151730666 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C159985019 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C166957645 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C17534553 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C192562407 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C19269812 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C204323151 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C205649164 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C21200559 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C24326235 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C2776133958 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C39432304 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C39807119 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C51399673 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C62649853 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C71924100 @default.
• W2002181014 hasConceptScore W2002181014C88575799 @default.
• W2002181014 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W2002181014 hasLocation W20021810141 @default.

• next