FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2002206557> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2002206557 endingPage "1287" @default.
• W2002206557 startingPage "1281" @default.
• W2002206557 abstract "Previous studies have shown that the SecY plug is displaced from the center of the SecYEG channel during polypeptide translocation. The structural and functional consequences of the deletion of the plug are now examined. Both in vivo and in vitro observations indicate that the plug domain is not essential to the function of the translocon. In fact, deletion of the plug confers to the cell and to the membranes a Prl-like phenotype: reduced proton-motive force dependence of translocation, increased membrane insertion of SecA, diminished requirement for functional leader peptide, and weakened SecYEG subunit association. Although the plug domain does not seem essential, locking the plug in the center of the channel inactivates the translocon. Thus, the SecY plug is important to regulate the activity of the channel and to confer specificity to the translocation reaction. We propose that the plug contributes to the gating mechanism of the channel by maintaining the structure of the SecYEG complex in a compact closed state. Previous studies have shown that the SecY plug is displaced from the center of the SecYEG channel during polypeptide translocation. The structural and functional consequences of the deletion of the plug are now examined. Both in vivo and in vitro observations indicate that the plug domain is not essential to the function of the translocon. In fact, deletion of the plug confers to the cell and to the membranes a Prl-like phenotype: reduced proton-motive force dependence of translocation, increased membrane insertion of SecA, diminished requirement for functional leader peptide, and weakened SecYEG subunit association. Although the plug domain does not seem essential, locking the plug in the center of the channel inactivates the translocon. Thus, the SecY plug is important to regulate the activity of the channel and to confer specificity to the translocation reaction. We propose that the plug contributes to the gating mechanism of the channel by maintaining the structure of the SecYEG complex in a compact closed state. The Sec translocon is a universally conserved membrane protein complex that cooperates with cytosolic partners to transport proteins into or across membranes. The membrane core complex (SecYEG in bacteria) forms the conduct for polypeptides. Membrane proteins are mostly inserted co-translationally by SecYEG-bound ribosomes, whereas secretory pre-proteins are translocated post-translationally by the motor ATPase SecA (1Luirink J. Sinning I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004; 1694: 17-35PubMed Google Scholar, 2Veenendaal A.K. van der Does C. Driessen A.J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004; 1694: 81-95Crossref PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar, 3Vrontou E. Economou A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004; 1694: 67-80Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar, 4Maillard A.P. Chan K. Duong F. Eichler J. Protein Movement across Membranes. Eurekah Landes Bioscience, Austin, TX2005: 19-27Crossref Google Scholar). In bacteria, the translocation process is enhanced by the proton gradient across the inner membrane, the proton motive force (PMF) 3The abbreviations and trivial names used are: PMF, proton motive force; AMP-PNP, adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imido)triphosphate; BN-PAGE, blue native-PAGE; CP3, Cu2+ (phenanthroline)3; DDM, β-d-dodecyl-maltoside; IMV, inner membrane vesicle; octyl-glucoside, n-octyl-β-d-glucopyranoside; TM, transmembrane. 3The abbreviations and trivial names used are: PMF, proton motive force; AMP-PNP, adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imido)triphosphate; BN-PAGE, blue native-PAGE; CP3, Cu2+ (phenanthroline)3; DDM, β-d-dodecyl-maltoside; IMV, inner membrane vesicle; octyl-glucoside, n-octyl-β-d-glucopyranoside; TM, transmembrane. (5Geller B.L. Movva N.R. Wickner W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1986; 83: 4219-4222Crossref PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar). The crystal structure of the Methanococcus jannaschii SecY complex (6Van den Berg B. Clemons Jr., W.M. Collinson I. Modis Y. Hartmann E. Harrison S.C. Rapoport T.A. Nature. 2004; 427: 36-44Crossref PubMed Scopus (975) Google Scholar) has unraveled the architecture of the core translocon. It consists of four key structural elements: the “channel,” located in the body of the SecY subunit; the “pore ring” made of 6 residues forming a constriction point in the middle of the channel; the “plug” domain formed by a small helix seating on top of the constriction on its periplamic side; and the “lateral gate” made by the juxtaposition of two SecY transmembrane (TM2 and TM7) segments that create an opening toward the lipid bilayer. The pore ring and the plug domain were proposed to close and to seal the channel, whereas the lateral gate would serve to accommodate the leader peptide of the preprotein or to release membrane protein domains into the membrane (6Van den Berg B. Clemons Jr., W.M. Collinson I. Modis Y. Hartmann E. Harrison S.C. Rapoport T.A. Nature. 2004; 427: 36-44Crossref PubMed Scopus (975) Google Scholar, 7Clemons Jr., W.M. Menetret J.F. Akey C.W. Rapoport T.A. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2004; 14: 390-396Crossref PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar). Increasing experimental evidences support the model predicted from the crystal structure. Using a photo-cross-linking approach, it was demonstrated that the leader peptide contacts the two TM segments forming the lateral gate (8Plath K. Mothes W. Wilkinson B.M. Stirling C.J. Rapoport T.A. Cell. 1998; 94: 795-807Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (278) Google Scholar). Using disulfide cross-linking techniques, it was shown that the plug moves away from the center of the channel (9Tam P.C. Maillard A.P. Chan K.K. Duong F. EMBO J. 2005; 24: 3380-3388Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar), whereas the polypep-tide substrate transits through the pore ring of the SecY subunit (10Cannon K.S. Or E. Clemons Jr., W.M. Shibata Y. Rapoport T.A. J. Cell Biol. 2005; 169: 219-225Crossref PubMed Scopus (130) Google Scholar). Retrospectively, the proposed mechanism of SecYEG channel gating is also supported by earlier studies. A specific class of mutations, called prl, into the SecY or SecE subunit allow the transport of proteins with defective or even missing leader peptides (11Bieker K.L. Phillips G.J. Silhavy T.J. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 1990; 22: 291-310Crossref PubMed Scopus (123) Google Scholar, 12Derman A.I. Puziss J.W. Bassford Jr., P.J. Beckwith J. EMBO J. 1993; 12: 879-888Crossref PubMed Scopus (176) Google Scholar). Biochemical studies showed that the mutation prlA4 enhances the translocation rates, abrogates the stimulatory effect of the PMF, and increases the affinity of the SecYEG complex for SecA (13Nouwen N. de Kruijff B. Tommassen J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996; 93: 5953-5957Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar, 14van der Wolk J.P. Fekkes P. Boorsma A. Huie J.L. Silhavy T.J. Driessen A.J. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 3631-3639Crossref PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar). Analyses of the stability of the SecYEG complexes carrying the prl mutations led to the proposal that these various phenotypes result from a loosened association among the SecYEG subunits (15Duong F. Wickner W. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 3263-3270Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar). The crystal structure shows that most of the prl mutations are located in the pore ring or in the plug domain, and these mutations may indeed destabilize the closed state of the channel (6Van den Berg B. Clemons Jr., W.M. Collinson I. Modis Y. Hartmann E. Harrison S.C. Rapoport T.A. Nature. 2004; 427: 36-44Crossref PubMed Scopus (975) Google Scholar). In the present study, we have analyzed further the contribution of the plug domain to the gating mechanism of the translocon. Our results show that the plug is not essential for the function of the SecYEG complex, both in vivo and in vitro. These results are in agreement with a recent study performed on the yeast translocon (16Junne T. Schwede T. Goder V. Spiess M. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2006; 17: 4063-4068Crossref PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar). However, in bacteria, we find that deletion of the plug enhances the activity of the channel during ATP-driven translocation and causes a phenotype similar to the Prl mutations. Accordingly, the absence of the plug results in loosened SecYEG subunit associations. The results suggest that the plug domain is not essential to seal the channel but rather acts as a structural element necessary for the stability, regulation, and selectivity of the translocon. Materials—ATP, AMP-PNP, carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone, and the monoclonal anti-hemagglutinin antibody were purchased from Sigma. β-octyl-glucoside and dodecyl-maltopyranoside (DDM) were purchased from Roche Applied Science and Anatrace. Mouse monoclonal antibody raised against the last cytoplasmic loop of SecY was a gift from Dr. I. Collinson. Polyvinylidene fluoride membrane used in Western blotting was purchased from Bio-Rad. Goat anti-mouse antibody coupled to the horseradish peroxydase was from Jackson Laboratories. Plamids and Constructs—The plasmid pBAD22-hisEYG and pBAD22-HAEYG carrying the prl mutations used in this study were previously described (15Duong F. Wickner W. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 3263-3270Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar, 17Douville K. Price A. Eichler J. Economou A. Wickner W. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 20106-20111Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar, 18Collinson I. Breyton C. Duong F. Tziatzios C. Schubert D. Or E. Rapoport T.A. Kuhlbrandt W. EMBO J. 2001; 20: 2462-2471Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar). The structure of M. jannaschii (Protein Data Bank: 1RHZ) and the published sequence alignments (6Van den Berg B. Clemons Jr., W.M. Collinson I. Modis Y. Hartmann E. Harrison S.C. Rapoport T.A. Nature. 2004; 427: 36-44Crossref PubMed Scopus (975) Google Scholar) were used to identify the Escherichia coli amino-acyl residues forming the SecY plug domain. The two SecY plug deletions were performed by PCR amplification of the region on each side of the desired deletion followed by digestion and replacement into the parental vector pBAD22-HAEYG. Residues from position 62 to 69 (TM2a) and 42 to 74 (periplasmic loop P1) were deleted to form SecYΔ8 and SecYΔ33, respectively. The deleted regions are replaced by the ApaI restriction site, which encodes for the sequence Gly-Pro. The residues at position Ser-68 and Ser-282 were replaced by cysteines in pBAD-hisEYG using the Transformer site-directed mutagenesis kit (Clontech). For plasmid expression of SecY in the absence of the SecE subunit, plasmid pBAD22-HAEYG was digested with NheI and SalI, treated with the Klenow fragment, and religated. The plasmid pCM10K-Y+ was built from pKY248 (19Taura T. Akiyama Y. Ito K. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1994; 243: 261-269Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar) and pCM10K (20Murphy C.K. Stewart E.J. Beckwith J. Gene (Amst.). 1995; 155: 1-7Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar). pCM10K-Y+ carries the origin of replication of pBR322, which is destabilized in strains containing the pcnB mutation, the rpsL+ gene, which confers dominant sensitivity to streptomycin, the secY+ gene under the control of the pLac promoter, and the resistance gene to kanamycin. Strain DB824 (MC4100, leu+, araΔ714, malE16, pcnB, secY::aadA, recA::cat, rpsL150) was built in several steps. Briefly, the substitution of the open reading frame of secY by aadA was achieved in E. coli DY378 cells (21Yu D. Ellis H.M. Lee E.C. Jenkins N.A. Copeland N.G. Court D.L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 5978-5983Crossref PubMed Scopus (1356) Google Scholar) carrying secY on the plasmid pKY248 (19Taura T. Akiyama Y. Ito K. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1994; 243: 261-269Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar). The product of aadA confers spectinomycin resistance, and the correct disruption of secY was checked by Southern blotting. Strain DB824, which carries secY+ on the plasmid pCM10K-Y+, was produced by P1-mediated transduction of the secY::aadA allele into E. coli DB757 followed by transduction of the recA deletion. The strain becomes resistant to 100 μg/ml streptomycin because of the aadA gene but sensitive to 1.5 mg/ml streptomycin because of the presence of rpsL+. Plasmid pCM10K-Y+ is unstable in DB824 because of the pcnB mutation. The genes coding for SecY, PrlA3, and the two plug-less mutants proteins were cloned in pBAD104, an AmpR plasmid that contains the pSC101 origin of replication compatible with pCM10K-Y+. In Vitro and in Vivo Translocation Assays—Preparation of inner membrane vesicles (IMVs), SecA, proOmpA, and the procedure for 125I radiolabeling were previously described (17Douville K. Price A. Eichler J. Economou A. Wickner W. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 20106-20111Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar, 22Bessonneau P. Besson V. Collinson I. Duong F. EMBO J. 2002; 21: 995-1003Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar). In vitro translocation assays were performed in 50 μl of TL buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.9; 50 mm NaCl; 50 mm KCl; 5 mm MgCl2) containing SecA (40 μg/ml), bovine serum albumin (200 μg/ml), IMVs (50 μg/ml), ATP (2 mm), and 125I-proOmpA (∼60,000 cpm; 0.56 μg/ml; 15 nm). After an 8-min incubation at 37 °C, translocation reactions were stopped on ice, treated with proteinase K (1 mg/ml, 15 min), trichloroacetic acid-precipitated, and analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE. Translocation efficiency was measured with a phosphorimaging device using the ImageQuant software and quantified by comparison with 125I-proOmpA standard curve. The SecA membrane insertion assay was performed using urea-stripped IMVs as described previously (23Economou A. Wickner W. Cell. 1994; 78: 835-843Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (482) Google Scholar). The measure of alkaline phosphatase PhoA exported to the periplasm, and the biosynthetic labeling and immuno-precipitation of the maltose-binding protein MalE were performed using protocols described previously (24Bost S. Belin D. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 4087-4093Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (33) Google Scholar). Intramolecular SecY Cross-links—Cross-link between the cysteine residues Cys-68 and Cys-282 was performed in 50 μl of TL buffer containing bovine serum albumin (200 μg/ml), IMVs (100 μg/ml), and the indicated amount of Cu2+(phenanthroline)3 (CP3) for 10 min at room temperature (9Tam P.C. Maillard A.P. Chan K.K. Duong F. EMBO J. 2005; 24: 3380-3388Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar). Oxidized IMVs were layered over 1 volume of 0.2 m sucrose in TL buffer and reisolated by ultracentrifugation (30 min, 4 °C, 55,000 rpm, Beckman TLA-55 rotor). IMVs were washed three times and resus-pended in TL buffer with brief sonication. Cross-linking efficiency was monitored by trypsin digestion (30 min, 4 °C, 1 mg/ml trypsin). Production of Plug-less Translocation Channels—The plug domain is located in the first periplasmic loop of SecY, just ahead of the transmembrane segment TM2. It is a short, distorted helix that seats atop of the channel, about half-way through the membrane (Fig. 1A). In most organisms, the plug region is connected to TM1 and TM2 by the sequences PΦXG and GΦXP, respectively (where Φ is a conserved hydrophobic amino acid). These motifs are proposed to serve as a hinge for the motion of the plug (6Van den Berg B. Clemons Jr., W.M. Collinson I. Modis Y. Hartmann E. Harrison S.C. Rapoport T.A. Nature. 2004; 427: 36-44Crossref PubMed Scopus (975) Google Scholar). In this study, we deleted the plug domain (residues 62–69; hereafter referred to as SecYΔ8) or most of the region delimited by the hinge motifs (residues 42–74; hereafter referred to as SecYΔ33) to minimize the possibility that the missing plug be replaced by adjacent residues from the loop. To determine whether these two deletions affect the stability or activity of the SecY protein, the mutant genes were cloned in the plasmid pBAD22 and introduced into the strain DB703, which carries the secY24 mutation (25Shiba K. Ito K. Yura T. Cerretti D.P. EMBO J. 1984; 3: 631-635Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar). secY24 encodes a SecY protein that is fully functional at 30 °C but sufficiently inactive at 42 °C to prevent colony formation on minimal medium glucose plates. The results show that partial complementation is obtained upon expression of the plasmids carrying the plug-less secY alleles (Fig. 1B, top panel), suggesting that activity of the plug-less translocons is somehow altered at 42 °C. Partial complementation is also observed when the plasmid expresses SecY containing the prlA3 mutation (mutation F67C in the plug domain). To analyze further the functionality of the plug-less secY mutants, we tested the ability of the secY mutant alleles to complement the strain DB824. DB824 has the chromosomal secY gene substituted by the aadA gene (which confers spectinomycin resistance) and carries the plasmid pCM10K-Y+ (which encodes a wild-type SecY and confers resistance to kanamycin). This plasmid also carries the rpsL+ gene and therefore confers dominant sensitivity to streptomycin. The genes encoding the secY mutant alleles were cloned onto the pBAD104 plasmid and introduced in strain DB824. Growth in the absence of kanamycin leads to the loss of pCM10K-Y+, but the cells remain viable and become resistant to a high concentration of streptomycin if a functional copy of the secY gene is provided by the plasmid pBAD104. The results show that both the plug-less secY gene and the prlA3 gene complement efficiently the strain DB824 (Fig. 1B, bottom panel). We thus conclude that the plug-less mutants form a functional translocon in cells growing at 37 °C. Finally, the secY mutant genes were cloned along secE and secG to test whether production of a stable SecYEG heterotrimeric complex is possible. Western blot analysis of purified IMVs shows that the SecY, SecE, and SecG proteins are produced to similar levels, regardless of the presence or the absence of the plug domain (Fig. 1C). Because the SecY protein is stable only if it forms a stoichiometric complex with SecE (26Matsuyama S. Akimaru J. Mizushima S. FEBS Lett. 1990; 269: 96-100Crossref PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar), the result suggests that the plug-less mutants are correctly assembled in the membrane and that the absence of the plug domain in these over-produced channels is not deleterious to the cell. Activity of the Plug-less Translocation Channel—Previous studies have shown that displacing the SecY-plug away from the center of the channel, either by covalent linkage or by using the prlA3 mutation (which increases the mobility of the plug), enhances the translocation activity of the channel (9Tam P.C. Maillard A.P. Chan K.K. Duong F. EMBO J. 2005; 24: 3380-3388Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar). It is thus conceivable that the deletion of the SecY-plug domain produces the same effect and confers a Prl-like phenotype. The in vitro translocation activity of the two plug-less SecYEG complexes was compared with the activity of the wild-type and the PrlA3 or PrlA4 translocons (Fig. 2A). The prlA4 mutation (I408N located in the pore ring) is the most potent prl mutation isolated to date (27Prinz W.A. Spiess C. Ehrmann M. Schierle C. Beckwith J. EMBO J. 1996; 15: 5209-5217Crossref PubMed Scopus (53) Google Scholar). As reported previously (13Nouwen N. de Kruijff B. Tommassen J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996; 93: 5953-5957Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar, 15Duong F. Wickner W. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 3263-3270Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar), both the prlA3 and the prlA4 mutations abrogate the stimulatory effect of the PMF on polypeptide translocation (Fig. 2A, upper and lower panels). When compared with the activity of the wild-type SecYEG complex measured in the absence of PMF, the prlA3 and prlA4 mutations stimulate proOmpA translocation by a factor of ∼5 and ∼12, respectively. In the presence of PMF, the plug-less SecYΔ8 and SecΔ33 mutant complexes also support efficient polypeptide translocation, at a level comparable with that obtained with the prlA3 mutation. It is clear that the two plug-less SecYEG mutants also bypass the stimulatory effect of the PMF. When compared with the wild type, the plug deletion stimulates the translocation activity by a factor of ∼6. A quantitative analysis using increasing amounts of polypep-tide substrate (Fig. 2B) supports the conclusion that the deletion of the plug domain enhances the activity of the SecYEG complex during ATP-driven translocation. Next, we tested the ability of the plug-less translocation channel to generate the “membrane-inserted state” of SecA, as assessed by the formation of a SecA-30-kDa protease-protected domain (23Economou A. Wickner W. Cell. 1994; 78: 835-843Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (482) Google Scholar). The SecA membrane insertion occurs at the initial step of the translocation cycle, and it represents another way to monitor the activity of the translocon. The results show that the prlA3 and prlA4 mutations increase the yield of protease-protected SecA, in agreement with previous studies (14van der Wolk J.P. Fekkes P. Boorsma A. Huie J.L. Silhavy T.J. Driessen A.J. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 3631-3639Crossref PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar, 15Duong F. Wickner W. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 3263-3270Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar). Similarly, the two plug-less mutants increase the formation of the SecA-30-kDa protease-protected domain (Fig. 2C). Since the plug-less and PrlA mutant complexes present similar in vitro translocation activities, we tested whether the deletion of the plug also confers a Prl phenotype in vivo. The Prl phenotype is characterized by the capacity of the cells to export proteins with a defective leader peptide (28Flower A.M. Doebele R.C. Silhavy T.J. J. Bacteriol. 1994; 176: 5607-5614Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). The plasmids encoding the SecYEG mutant complexes were transformed into a strain producing PhoA(Δ8–9) (29Michaelis S. Inouye H. Oliver D. Beckwith J. J. Bacteriol. 1983; 154: 366-374Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), and the amount of exported alkaline phosphatase was measured in the periplasmic fraction of the cells (Fig. 3A). The results show that the deletion of the plug effectively suppresses the translocation defect of PhoA(Δ8–9). The suppression obtained with the SecYΔ8 mutant complex is almost as strong as that observed with the complex carrying the prlA3 or prlA4 mutation. As a complementary assay, we measured the export efficiency of the maltose-binding protein MalE(T16K) (30Bedouelle H. Bassford Jr., P.J. Fowler A.V. Zabin I. Beckwith J. Hofnung M. Nature. 1980; 285: 78-81Crossref PubMed Scopus (138) Google Scholar) using radioactive pulse labeling followed by immunoprecipitation and densitometry scanning. As determined by the extent of signal sequence cleavage, only 10% of the MalE(T16K) protein is exported during the radioactive pulse in cells expressing the wild-type SecYEG complex (Fig. 3B). In contrast, in cells expressing the plug-less SecYEG complexes, the export is strongly improved and almost reaches the level observed in cells expressing the PrlA3 mutant complex. Altogether, the results show that the deletion of the plug domain increases the activity of the SecYEG channel but reduces its selectivity. Structural Stability of the Plug-less Translocation Channel— When extracted from the lipid bilayer with detergents, the SecYEG complex easily dissociates into single subunits (31Brundage L. Fimmel C.J. Mizushima S. Wickner W. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 4166-4170Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). This property was exploited to demonstrate that a fundamental distinction between the wild-type and the PrlA mutant channel resides in the strength of the SecYEG subunit associations (15Duong F. Wickner W. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 3263-3270Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar). The two plug-less SecYEG complexes were thus tested for the stability of their quaternary structure upon extraction from the membrane with DDM. The solubilized membrane proteins were analyzed by blue native-PAGE (BN-PAGE (32Schägger H. Cramer W.A. von Jagow G. Anal. Biochem. 1994; 217: 220-230Crossref PubMed Scopus (1034) Google Scholar)) followed by immunostaining with SecG antibodies (Fig. 4A). As reported previously (22Bessonneau P. Besson V. Collinson I. Duong F. EMBO J. 2002; 21: 995-1003Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar), the SecYEG complex migrates as a population of monomers and dimers, and the same behavior is observed for the SecYEG complex carrying the prlA3 or prlA4 mutation. In contrast, signs of complex instability are observed when analyzing the SecYEG complex with the large SecYΔ33 deletion. With this mutant, the population of SecYEG monomer-dimer is strongly reduced with a concomitant increase of dissociated products, migrating below the SecYEG monomer. The SecYΔ8 deletion also appears to destabilize the SecYEG channel but to a lesser extent. To analyze further the strength of the SecYEG association, the plug-less and PrlA4 mutant complexes were His-tagged and purified by Ni2+-chelating chromatography in the presence of DDM, as described previously (18Collinson I. Breyton C. Duong F. Tziatzios C. Schubert D. Or E. Rapoport T.A. Kuhlbrandt W. EMBO J. 2001; 20: 2462-2471Crossref PubMed Scopus (109) Google Scholar). With SecYΔ33 deletion, the purification yielded only the SecE subunit, as expected since the SecYEG complex readily dissociates during incubation with the detergent (data not shown but see Fig. 4A). The SecYEG complex carrying the secYΔ8 deletion was, however, sufficiently stable to allow its purification, and it was obtained at a yield comparable with the wild-type or the PrlA4 complex. Next, these purified complexes were incubated at room temperature with β-octyl-glucoside and then analyzed by BN-PAGE (Fig. 4B). The detergent β-octyl-glucoside was used in the past to monitor the strength of the SecYEG subunit association (15Duong F. Wickner W. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 3263-3270Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar, 31Brundage L. Fimmel C.J. Mizushima S. Wickner W. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 4166-4170Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The results show that the oligomeric state of the SecYEG complex is shifted toward the monomer when it carries the prlA4 or secYΔ8 mutation (Fig. 4B, left panel). Furthermore, incubation with a higher amount of detergent dissociates further the PrlA4 and SecYΔ8 mutant complexes into single subunits, whereas the wild-type complex remains mostly intact in these conditions (Fig. 4B, middle panel). Altogether, the results show that the SecYEG subunit associations are more fragile when the SecY plug is absent or when SecY carries the prlA4 mutation. The results agree with the proposal that the stability of the SecYEG structure is correlated to the activity of the channel (15Duong F. Wickner W. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 3263-3270Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar). The Dynamics of the Plug Are Essential for Protein Translocation—Disulfide cross-linking studies have shown that the plug domain moves away from the center of the channel during protein translocation (9Tam P.C. Maillard A.P. Chan K.K. Duong F. EMBO J. 2005; 24: 3380-3388Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar), but this study reveals that the plug domain is not essential per se for the function of the translocon. We thus asked whether the plug dynamics are essential for the translocation reaction. This was achieved by reducing the mobility of the plug by cysteine cross-linking. The crystal structure of the M. jannaschii SecY complex allowed us to predict that the E. coli SecY residues Ser-68 (located in the plug domain) and Ser-282 (located in TM7) would be close to each other in the resting (closed) state of the channel. These 2 aminoacyl residues were replaced by cysteine residues, and the resulting SecYEG complex was overproduced in E. coli. The membranes were isolated and oxidized with CP3 before being reisolated. The presence of a trypsin cleavage site located in the cytosolic loop between TM6 and TM7 of SecY (33Brundage L. Hendrick J.P. Schiebel E. Driessen A.J. Wickner W. Cell. 1990; 62: 649-657Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (386) Google Scholar) allowed monitoring the efficiency of disulfide linkage between the residues Cys-68 and Cys-282 (Fig. 5A). In the presence of trypsin, the SecY protein is digested into two fragments, and the C-terminal fragment (∼14 kDa) is detected using an antibody recognizing the most C-terminal cytoplasmic loop of SecY (Fig. 5A, top panel). When the residues Cys-68 and Cys-282 form a disulfide bond, the N- and C-terminal fragments remain tethered together, and the trypsinolyzed-SecY migrates like the uncleaved SecY on non-reducing SDS-PAGE (Fig. 5A, lower panel). This disulfide bond depends on the presence of both cysteines in SecY (data not shown), and the results show that an efficient covalent linkage is obtained upon incubation of the IMVs with 200 μm CP3 (Fig. 5A). The membranes containing the oxidized SecYEG complex were then tested for their protein translocation activity (Fig. 5B). The results show that the progressive oxidation of the SecYEG complex leads to a concomitant decrease of the protein translocation efficiency. At 200 μm CP3, the plug domain is covalently linked to residue Cys-282 of TM7 (Fig. 5A), and the translocation activity is reduced to a level comparable with that of wild-type membranes (i.e. containing only chromosomally encoded wild-type SecYEG). This reduction of translocation activity depends on the presence of both Cys-68 and Cys-282 in SecY (Fig. 5B). Thus, the mobility of the plug is essential to the mechanism of protein translocation. The crystal structure of the SecY complex represents the closed state of the channel because the central passage is blocked by the plug domain and the constriction ring. For the channel to open, the plug needs to move away, and the constriction ring must expand to widen the passage for outgoing polypeptide substrate. Computer-based simulations support this model (34Bostina M. Mohsin B. Kuhlbrandt W. Collinson I. J. Mol. Biol. 2005; 352: 1035-1043Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar, 35Gumbart J. Schulten K. Biophys. J. 2006; 90: 2356-2367Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar, 36Tian P. Andricioaei I. Biophys. J. 2006; 90: 2718-2730Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar), and experimental data show that the plug domain is indeed relocated outside the channel toward the C terminus of the SecE subunit during translocation (9Tam P.C. Maillard A.P. Chan K.K. Duong F. EMBO J. 2005; 24: 3380-3388Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar, 37Harris C.R. Silhavy T.J. J. Bacteriol. 1999; 181: 3438-3444Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Furthermore, it has been shown that locking the plug in the open state enhances the in vitro activity of the translocon (9Tam P.C. Maillard A.P. Chan K.K. Duong F. EMBO J. 2005; 24: 3380-3388Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar), whereas locking the plug in its closed position (this study) abolishes translocation. These experimental observations clearly indicate that the movement of the plug is an essential subreaction occurring during polypeptide transport across the membrane. The function of the plug is, however, not yet fully understood. Earlier in vivo experiments showed that the combination of the mutations prlA3 (F67C in the plug domain of SecY) with a cysteine at position 120 in SecE (periplasmic end of SecE) results in synthetic lethality (37Harris C.R. Silhavy T.J. J. Bacteriol. 1999; 181: 3438-3444Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Because formation of a disulfide bridge between the 2 cysteines should leave the channel in a permanently open state, it was logical to suppose that an important function of the plug is to close the channel pore to small molecules. However, both this study in bacteria and a recent study in yeast (16Junne T. Schwede T. Goder V. Spiess M. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2006; 17: 4063-4068Crossref PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar) rather indicate that the plug domain is not essential for cell viability or for the general function of the translocon. A partial growth defect is observed on minimal medium at 42 °C when the plug-less SecY protein is overproduced in the absence of its interacting partner SecE (Fig. 1B). The reason remains unclear and could be linked to the stress of cells growing on minimal medium (38Tao H. Bausch C. Richmond C. Blattner F.R. Conway T. J. Bacteriol. 1999; 181: 6425-6440Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). In yeast, the absence of the plug reduces the steady state level and the activity of the translocon, but the cells are viable (16Junne T. Schwede T. Goder V. Spiess M. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2006; 17: 4063-4068Crossref PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar). Here, we show that overproduction of the plug-less SecYEG complex is possible and does not yield dominant-negative effects. This last observation clearly indicates that the plug domain is not required per se to seal the channel in the resting state. Instead, the constriction ring may be sufficient to hinder ions and other molecules from permeating through the channel. In eukaryotes, there are evidences that the lumenal chaperone BiP forms an alternative or additional sealing system on the extracytoplasmic side of the translocon (39Hamman B.D. Hendershot L.M. Johnson A.E. Cell. 1998; 92: 747-758Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar, 40Alder N.N. Shen Y. Brodsky J.L. Hendershot L.M. Johnson A.E. J. Cell Biol. 2005; 168: 389-399Crossref PubMed Scopus (134) Google Scholar). Although the role of the plug domain as a membrane seal before or during protein transport cannot be ruled out, our results suggest another function. The results show that the deletion of this domain converts the SecYEG complex into a “Prl-like” translocon. In the majority, the prl in secY mutations are confined to the pore and plug domains (6Van den Berg B. Clemons Jr., W.M. Collinson I. Modis Y. Hartmann E. Harrison S.C. Rapoport T.A. Nature. 2004; 427: 36-44Crossref PubMed Scopus (975) Google Scholar, 41Smith M.A. Clemons Jr., W.M. DeMars C.J. Flower A.M. J. Bacteriol. 2005; 187: 6454-6465Crossref PubMed Scopus (70) Google Scholar), and they confer various in vivo and in vitro phenotypes: enhanced trans-location rates, increased membrane affinity and insertion of SecA, diminished requirement for canonical leader peptides, reduced PMF dependence of translocation, facilitated translocation of folded domains, and for some leader peptides or TM segments, inversion of their membrane topology (13Nouwen N. de Kruijff B. Tommassen J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996; 93: 5953-5957Crossref PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar, 14van der Wolk J.P. Fekkes P. Boorsma A. Huie J.L. Silhavy T.J. Driessen A.J. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 3631-3639Crossref PubMed Scopus (83) Google Scholar, 42Peters E.A. Schatz P.J. Johnson S.S. Dower W.J. J. Bacteriol. 1994; 176: 4296-4305Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 43Prinz W.A. Boyd D.H. Ehrmann M. Beckwith J. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 8419-8424Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar). It was proposed that these seemingly unrelated effects all derive from an enhanced conformational flexibility of the trans-location channel (15Duong F. Wickner W. EMBO J. 1999; 18: 3263-3270Crossref PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar). Accordingly, the SecYEG complex is expected to be very dynamic to let the polypeptide substrate move through or be released laterally into the lipid bilayer. Our results show that the plug domain interacts with the middle part of TM7 (forming part of the lateral gate), whereas the deletion of the plug domain weakens the SecYEG associations. It is thus possible that the plug domain in the resting position interacts with the inner walls of the channel, which, in turn, contributes to stiffen and stabilize the structure of the channel in the closed state. In such a scenario, binding of the leader peptide between TM2 and TM7 (8Plath K. Mothes W. Wilkinson B.M. Stirling C.J. Rapoport T.A. Cell. 1998; 94: 795-807Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (278) Google Scholar) would disrupt the interaction between the plug domain and the walls of the channel, provoke the relaxation of the channel structure, and enable the widening of the central pore to open the channel for translocation. In conclusion, the genetic selections yielded prl mutations that enhance the dynamics of the plug domain and loosen the SecYEG association of the subunits, whereas preserving sufficient stability for the channel to avoid dissociation. More radical mutations such as the deletion of the plug domain do not affect the basic function of the translocon but, like the prl mutations, relax the channel structure and deregulate its activity. In the absence of the plug domain, the channel becomes less sensitive to the stimulatory effect of the PMF and less selective toward the composition of the leader peptide. We are grateful to the laboratory members for stimulating discussions and careful reading of the manuscript. Deregulation of the SecYEG translocation channel upon removal of the plug domain.Journal of Biological ChemistryVol. 284Issue 24PreviewVOLUME 282 (2007) PAGES 1281–1287 Full-Text PDF Open Access" @default.
• W2002206557 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2002206557 creator A5023864238 @default.
• W2002206557 creator A5034444520 @default.
• W2002206557 creator A5049243441 @default.
• W2002206557 creator A5081188571 @default.
• W2002206557 creator A5083905961 @default.
• W2002206557 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W2002206557 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2002206557 title "Deregulation of the SecYEG Translocation Channel upon Removal of the Plug Domain" @default.
• W2002206557 cites W1276010910 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W1542418388 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W1554414192 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W1590719173 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W1747708829 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W1948880364 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W1963530308 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W1965170134 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W1971302592 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W1990008715 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W1997407616 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2008223866 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2009067269 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2009080452 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2022572800 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2023378397 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2037341533 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2060531841 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2065635080 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2066537459 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2073726493 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2075922914 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2087964513 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2088909375 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2090320203 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2094624515 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2097534440 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2098042241 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2118278390 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2121689536 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2136670217 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2144346115 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2150771080 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2152737402 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2154692468 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2155234325 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2155542617 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2155924407 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2161729553 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W2233085118 @default.
• W2002206557 cites W59314449 @default.
• W2002206557 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m610060200" @default.
• W2002206557 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2713572" @default.
• W2002206557 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17092931" @default.
• W2002206557 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2002206557 type Work @default.
• W2002206557 sameAs 2002206557 @default.
• W2002206557 citedByCount "69" @default.
• W2002206557 countsByYear W20022065572012 @default.
• W2002206557 countsByYear W20022065572013 @default.
• W2002206557 countsByYear W20022065572014 @default.
• W2002206557 countsByYear W20022065572015 @default.
• W2002206557 countsByYear W20022065572016 @default.
• W2002206557 countsByYear W20022065572017 @default.
• W2002206557 countsByYear W20022065572018 @default.
• W2002206557 countsByYear W20022065572019 @default.
• W2002206557 countsByYear W20022065572020 @default.
• W2002206557 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2002206557 hasAuthorship W2002206557A5023864238 @default.
• W2002206557 hasAuthorship W2002206557A5034444520 @default.
• W2002206557 hasAuthorship W2002206557A5049243441 @default.
• W2002206557 hasAuthorship W2002206557A5081188571 @default.
• W2002206557 hasAuthorship W2002206557A5083905961 @default.
• W2002206557 hasBestOaLocation W20022065571 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C12554922 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C127162648 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C138626823 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C164205550 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C36503486 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConceptScore W2002206557C104317684 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConceptScore W2002206557C121332964 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConceptScore W2002206557C12554922 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConceptScore W2002206557C127162648 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConceptScore W2002206557C134306372 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConceptScore W2002206557C138626823 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConceptScore W2002206557C164205550 @default.
• W2002206557 hasConceptScore W2002206557C185592680 @default.

• next