FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2002466669> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2002466669 endingPage "8" @default.
• W2002466669 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2002466669 abstract "DAO Diseases of Aquatic Organisms Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsSpecials DAO 72:1-8 (2006) - doi:10.3354/dao072001 Association between environmental stress and epidermal papillomatosis of roach Rutilus rutilus T. L. Korkea-aho1,*, J. M. Partanen1, V. Kiviniemi2, A. Vainikka3, J. Taskinen4 1Institute of Applied Biotechnology and 2IT Centre, Statistical and Mathematical Services, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland 3Institute of Coastal Research, Swedish Board of Fisheries, PO Box 109, 74071 Öregrund, Sweden 4Karelian Institute, Department of Ecology, University of Joensuu, PO Box 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland *Email: tiina.korkea-aho@uku.fi ABSTRACT: We studied the association between environmental stress and epidermal papillomatosis of roach Rutilus rutilus L. in Finnish waters using a ‘matched pairs’ design. Populations impacted by industrial and/or sewage effluents were compared to reference populations from pristine sites. We examined both the prevalence (proportion of diseased fish) and intensity (number of scales covered by tumors) of the disease. Results of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) indicated that the risk of papillomatosis was 7.5 times higher in males than females, and increased 1.3 times for every 10 mm increment in fish length. We controlled for the possible effects of fish size, sex and temporal variation through sampling procedures and statistical analyses. Mean prevalence of epidermal papillomatosis was 16.6 and 5.8% in impact and reference populations, respectively (10 population pairs; nfish = 1714). Results of GLMM suggested that the risk of being diseased was 2.7 times higher in the impact than reference populations. Thus, the prevalence of epidermal papillomatosis in roach can be used as an indicator of environmental stress. Results of Linear Mixed Models indicated no difference in the intensity of the disease between impact and reference populations (5 population pairs; nfish = 73; mean ± SE 10.7 ± 1.8 and 11.7 ± 2.9 scales, respectively), although prevalence was higher in impact populations in those 5 population pairs. The possible relationship between environmental stress and intensity of epidermal papillomatosis in natural roach populations remains to be demonstrated. KEY WORDS: Environmental monitoring · Epizootic cutaneous papillomatosis · Roach · Disease · Large lakes · Matched pairs Full text in pdf format NextExport citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in DAO Vol. 72, No. 1. Online publication date: September 14, 2006 Print ISSN: 0177-5103; Online ISSN: 1616-1580 Copyright © 2006 Inter-Research." @default.
• W2002466669 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2002466669 creator A5016674131 @default.
• W2002466669 creator A5028101430 @default.
• W2002466669 creator A5069023376 @default.
• W2002466669 creator A5082210879 @default.
• W2002466669 creator A5087030393 @default.
• W2002466669 date "2006-09-14" @default.
• W2002466669 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2002466669 title "Association between environmental stress and epidermal papillomatosis of roach Rutilus rutilus" @default.
• W2002466669 cites W1520615007 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W1554773889 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W1912184527 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W1975816953 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W1979764919 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W1981172623 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W1981761745 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W1984462140 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W1985224413 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W1988108705 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W1990176808 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2002546494 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2005028192 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2005722163 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2015332208 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2020029196 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2020403622 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2030738089 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2037531193 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2038715011 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2039844275 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2047291120 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2047985108 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2048352247 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2053967756 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2061498598 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2061687980 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2062051338 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2070686186 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2073642717 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2076305548 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2077098227 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2086163398 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2093553116 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2093606549 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2096493625 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2103118980 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2104999266 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2107636378 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2112162374 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2113468918 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2132919392 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2142033004 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2144292825 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2152200500 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2160919326 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2163112172 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2289015877 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2602750411 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2990841607 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W3180181362 @default.
• W2002466669 cites W2510415706 @default.
• W2002466669 doi "https://doi.org/10.3354/dao072001" @default.
• W2002466669 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17067068" @default.
• W2002466669 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2002466669 type Work @default.
• W2002466669 sameAs 2002466669 @default.
• W2002466669 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2002466669 countsByYear W20024666692013 @default.
• W2002466669 countsByYear W20024666692015 @default.
• W2002466669 countsByYear W20024666692016 @default.
• W2002466669 countsByYear W20024666692017 @default.
• W2002466669 countsByYear W20024666692019 @default.
• W2002466669 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2002466669 hasAuthorship W2002466669A5016674131 @default.
• W2002466669 hasAuthorship W2002466669A5028101430 @default.
• W2002466669 hasAuthorship W2002466669A5069023376 @default.
• W2002466669 hasAuthorship W2002466669A5082210879 @default.
• W2002466669 hasAuthorship W2002466669A5087030393 @default.
• W2002466669 hasBestOaLocation W20024666691 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConcept C2777063820 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConcept C2777547786 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConcept C2909208804 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConcept C505870484 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConcept C90856448 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConceptScore W2002466669C144024400 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConceptScore W2002466669C149923435 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConceptScore W2002466669C18903297 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConceptScore W2002466669C2777063820 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConceptScore W2002466669C2777547786 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConceptScore W2002466669C2908647359 @default.
• W2002466669 hasConceptScore W2002466669C2909208804 @default.

• next