FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2002956992> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2002956992 endingPage "288" @default.
• W2002956992 startingPage "283" @default.
• W2002956992 abstract "Abstract – The purpose of this study was to test the actual resistance against fracture of a crown fragment fractured and reattached using three different techniques of preparation. Forty bovine incisors were randomly assigned into four groups of which the first was the control group. The elements of the three experimental groups were all cut at a fixed distance of 3 mm for the incisal margin on the buccal surface of the crown in a plane normal to the buccal surface itself, and subsequently re‐bonded using an adhesive system. After the reattachment, on the teeth of group 2, a circumferential chamfer was performed along the fracture line; on the teeth of group 3 a groove called ‘overcontour’ was made also along the fracture line; the teeth in group 4 received a chamfer on the buccal surface and an overcontour on the lingual surface. Finally, all the elements were encompassed in chalk blocks and the models were mounted on the 858 Mini Bionix to perform a fatigue load test. A force was applied on the buccal surface of each tooth at 1.5 mm from the incisor margin, with a velocity of 1 mm min −1 , through the use of a steel prick. All the elements of groups 2, 3 and 4 demonstrated a lower resistance to fracture in comparison with the elements of the control group. The teeth of group 2 showed a resistance to fracture equal to 36.1% of the resistance of the elements in the control group; in group 3 the resistance was equal to 50.2%, while in group 4 the resistance reached 55.9%. The difference in resistance between group 3 and group 4 did not result statistically significant ( P = 0.82). Reattachment of coronal fragments does not restore the resistance to fracture to an equal level of the intact teeth, in a static test. The different techniques of preparation significantly modify the resistance to the fracture of a re‐bonded fragment. The technique of the circumferential chamfer produced results that were less favourable in terms of resistance against fracture." @default.
• W2002956992 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2002956992 creator A5019300278 @default.
• W2002956992 creator A5020215536 @default.
• W2002956992 creator A5039152128 @default.
• W2002956992 creator A5039339997 @default.
• W2002956992 creator A5078421480 @default.
• W2002956992 date "2008-06-01" @default.
• W2002956992 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2002956992 title "Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction" @default.
• W2002956992 cites W1998224901 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2022123344 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2024352284 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2035943458 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2036490701 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2039917536 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2048183610 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2061345906 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2081315592 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2093630792 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2102081700 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2138945369 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2143834005 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2156422950 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2160229888 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2166341432 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2170725098 @default.
• W2002956992 cites W2334837982 @default.
• W2002956992 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00539.x" @default.
• W2002956992 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18489478" @default.
• W2002956992 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2002956992 type Work @default.
• W2002956992 sameAs 2002956992 @default.
• W2002956992 citedByCount "31" @default.
• W2002956992 countsByYear W20029569922012 @default.
• W2002956992 countsByYear W20029569922015 @default.
• W2002956992 countsByYear W20029569922016 @default.
• W2002956992 countsByYear W20029569922017 @default.
• W2002956992 countsByYear W20029569922018 @default.
• W2002956992 countsByYear W20029569922020 @default.
• W2002956992 countsByYear W20029569922021 @default.
• W2002956992 countsByYear W20029569922022 @default.
• W2002956992 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2002956992 hasAuthorship W2002956992A5019300278 @default.
• W2002956992 hasAuthorship W2002956992A5020215536 @default.
• W2002956992 hasAuthorship W2002956992A5039152128 @default.
• W2002956992 hasAuthorship W2002956992A5039339997 @default.
• W2002956992 hasAuthorship W2002956992A5078421480 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C116017498 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C159824338 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C195735259 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C2776313386 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C2778400979 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C2778812414 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C2779472054 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C2909431374 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C43369102 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C116017498 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C127413603 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C159824338 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C159985019 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C191897082 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C192562407 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C195735259 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C199343813 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C2524010 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C2776313386 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C2778400979 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C2778812414 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C2779472054 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C2909431374 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C29694066 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C33923547 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C43369102 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C66938386 @default.
• W2002956992 hasConceptScore W2002956992C71924100 @default.
• W2002956992 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2002956992 hasLocation W20029569921 @default.
• W2002956992 hasLocation W20029569922 @default.
• W2002956992 hasOpenAccess W2002956992 @default.
• W2002956992 hasPrimaryLocation W20029569921 @default.
• W2002956992 hasRelatedWork W1980372481 @default.
• W2002956992 hasRelatedWork W1990831787 @default.
• W2002956992 hasRelatedWork W2002840572 @default.
• W2002956992 hasRelatedWork W2060065922 @default.
• W2002956992 hasRelatedWork W2135327945 @default.
• W2002956992 hasRelatedWork W2315639248 @default.
• W2002956992 hasRelatedWork W2365282118 @default.

• next