FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003104247> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003104247 abstract "Proceedings: AACR 101st Annual Meeting 2010‐‐ Apr 17‐21, 2010; Washington, DCBackground : In 2008, a new FIGO staging system was specifically designed and approved for endometrial stromal sarcoma. Our objective was to determine the impact of this new staging system on survival in patients with stage I endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS).Methods : Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1988 and 2005. Kaplan-Meier log rank and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis and to identify possible predictors for survival.Results : The identified cohort included 464 women, with 310 (67%) low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS), 96 (21%) high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS), and 58 (12%) unclassified ESS. LGESS compared to HGESS differed significantly with regards to the patient age (48 vs. 60 years, p<0.001), tumor size (5.6 cm vs. 8.0 cm, p<0.001), cervical involvement (5.2% vs. 18.8%, p<0.001), myometrial invasion (62% vs. 66.6%, p=0.01), and stage IB disease (44% vs. 76%, p<0.001). Similarly, compared with LGESS, a greater percentage of HGESS patients underwent lymphadenectomy (29.0% vs. 60.4%; P <0.001), salpingo-oophorectomy (78.4% vs. 93.7%, p=0.001), and administration of radiotherapy (14.8% vs 50.0%; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between stages IA and IB with regards to the above-mentioned demographic and clinico-pathologic variables, in both LGESS and HGESS. The 5-year overall survival was worse in HGESS than LGESS (45.4% vs. 97.2%, p<0.001). The difference in 5-year overall survival between stages IA and IB was significant in LGESS (100% vs. 93.5%, p=0.003), but not in HGESS (51.4% vs. 43.5%, p=0.2). Although age (p=0.001), race (p= 0.005), stage (p=0.004) were all significant prognostic factors in LGESS, only cervical involvement (p=0.02) was a significant predictor in HGESS.Conclusion: The new staging system is appropriate for risk stratification in LGESS. The prognosis in HGESS seems to be most influenced by the presence of cervical involvement and not by tumor size as the staging criteria would suggest.Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-71." @default.
• W2003104247 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003104247 creator A5003299608 @default.
• W2003104247 creator A5057047604 @default.
• W2003104247 creator A5063128882 @default.
• W2003104247 date "2010-04-15" @default.
• W2003104247 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2003104247 title "Abstract LB-71: Stage Ia vs. Ib endometrial stromal sarcoma: Does the new staging system predict survival" @default.
• W2003104247 doi "https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am10-lb-71" @default.
• W2003104247 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2003104247 type Work @default.
• W2003104247 sameAs 2003104247 @default.
• W2003104247 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2003104247 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2003104247 hasAuthorship W2003104247A5003299608 @default.
• W2003104247 hasAuthorship W2003104247A5057047604 @default.
• W2003104247 hasAuthorship W2003104247A5063128882 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C10515644 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C16930146 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C2777088508 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C2777546739 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C2778256501 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C2778938455 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C2780057860 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C2780824555 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C50382708 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C10515644 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C121608353 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C126322002 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C142724271 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C143998085 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C146357865 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C151730666 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C16930146 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C2777088508 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C2777546739 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C2778256501 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C2778938455 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C2780057860 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C2780824555 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C29456083 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C50382708 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C71924100 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C72563966 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C86803240 @default.
• W2003104247 hasConceptScore W2003104247C90924648 @default.
• W2003104247 hasLocation W20031042471 @default.
• W2003104247 hasOpenAccess W2003104247 @default.
• W2003104247 hasPrimaryLocation W20031042471 @default.
• W2003104247 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2003104247 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2003104247 magId "2003104247" @default.
• W2003104247 workType "article" @default.