FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003131878> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003131878 endingPage "R413" @default.
• W2003131878 startingPage "R412" @default.
• W2003131878 abstract "Neuroscientific studies of the mind are likely to benefit from the insights and skills of Tibetan Buddhist monks who have practiced the historic tradition of meditative training over many years — a point made recently at a forum between a selection of Buddhist leaders and distinguished scientists [1Barinaga M. Buddhism and neuroscience. Studying the well-trained mind.Science. 2003; 302: 44-46Crossref PubMed Scopus (48) Google Scholar]. Perceptual rivalries, such as binocular rivalry [2Blake R. Logothetis N. Visual competition.Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002; 3: 13-21Crossref PubMed Scopus (959) Google Scholar] and motion induced blindness [3Bonneh Y. Cooperman A. Sagi D. Motion induced blindness in normal observers.Nature. 2001; 411: 798-801Crossref PubMed Scopus (238) Google Scholar], are being used to study the neural mechanisms underlying consciousness and attention [2Blake R. Logothetis N. Visual competition.Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002; 3: 13-21Crossref PubMed Scopus (959) Google Scholar, 4Mitchell J. Stoner G. Reynolds J. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.Nature. 2004; 429: 410-413Crossref PubMed Scopus (182) Google Scholar], as they involve fluctuations in conscious awareness despite unchanging external stimulation. Tapping into the ability of Tibetan Buddhist monks to control the flow of items being attended to and accessing consciousness, we found that meditation alters the inherent fluctuations in conscious state associated with perceptual rivalry. With the support of His Holiness the Dalai Lama, a total of 76 Tibetan Buddhist monks varying in experience from 5 to 54 years of training (including three ‘retreatist’ meditators, each with at least 20 years experience in isolated mountain retreats) were tested using non-intrusive perceptual measures at, or near, their mountain retreats in the Himalaya, Zanskar and Ladakhi Ranges of India. Binocular rivalry was induced with head-mounted display goggles (Figure 1A ) that presented horizontal and vertical green stationary gratings to the right and left eye, respectively (see Supplemental data available with this article online). In cases where coordinated button-press responses were not possible, verbal reports were recorded. Harnessing the skills of highly trained monks to control their mental state, we report results from 23 monks corresponding to two types of meditation, approximately translated as ‘compassion’ (a non-referential contemplation of suffering within the world combined with the emanation of loving kindness) and ‘one-point’ (through the maintained focus of attention on a single object, the mind is calmed and the distracting influences of other internal and external events is reduced). Consistent with a recent study [5Lehmann D. Faber P.L. Achermann P. Jeanmonod D. Gianotti R.R. Pizzagalli D. Brain sources of EEG gamma frequency during volitionally meditation-induced, altered states of consciousness, and experience of the self.Psychiatry Res. 2001; 108: 111-121Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (119) Google Scholar] linking different types of meditation with distinct patterns of neural activity, we found compassion and one-point meditation had similarly differential ‘functional’ effects on the visual switching during rivalry. In contrast to compassion meditation, which led to no observable change in rivalry rate, one-point meditation led to extreme increases in perceptual dominance durations that were reported by 50% of monks after a period of one-point meditation (reports collected via button-press, as shown in Figure 1C,D, or verbally). Additional prolongation/ stabilization was reported (verbally) by the monks when they viewed the rivalry display during one-point meditation (Figure 1B). Within this group, three (including two of the ‘retreatists’) reported complete perceptual stability throughout the entire 5minute meditation period. There was no consistent pattern in the dominant orientation favored. During periods of stabilization, the reported percepts often differed from either of the two presented gratings, with qualitative changes in depth, color and width. In some cases the perceptual dominance was complete; in other cases the non-dominant image remained partially visible. For example, one monk reported the stable dominance of the vertical gratings appearing as three-dimensional columns that were wider, brighter and closer than during normal viewing conditions. During this time the horizontal gratings remained faintly visible: set back in depth, they appeared thin and pale with a slight blue coloration. These results contrast sharply with the reported observations of over 1000 meditation-naive individuals tested previously. Because most of the monks served as their own controls by participating in the different meditation conditions, the finding that the increase in prolongation/ stabilization was specific to only one of the meditation types (Figure 1B) suggests that the effect is real, rather then simply reflecting miscommunication or a general incapability to perform the task. Furthermore it suggests that the prolongation of rivalry dominance observed results from the intense attentional focus and the practiced ability to stabilize the mind during one-point meditation, rather than the process of meditation per se. Volunteers were also tested on motion induced blindness prior to any meditation (see Supplemental data for details) and the mean disappearance duration reported was 4.1s (s.d. ± 3.9 s), compared to 2.6 s (s.d. ± 1.6 s) recorded from a group of 61 meditation-naive volunteers tested previously [6Carter O. Pettigrew J. A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries?.Perception. 2003; 32: 295-305Crossref PubMed Scopus (125) Google Scholar] (t = 2.8, p < 0.001) (Figure 2). The most extreme finding came from the ‘retreatist’ volunteer with the most experience at meditation (25 years intense practice in mountain retreats). After a period of ‘passive’ viewing he commented that he could maintain the disappearance indefinitely. So we suggested he attempt to ‘actively’ maintain the disappearance and after recommencing, he reported the first reappearance of any of the three yellow target dots after 723s of sustained motion induced blindness disappearance! The primary result of this study is that individuals trained in meditation can measurably alter the normal fluctuations in conscious state induced by binocular rivalry and motion-induced blindness. The meditation specific changes in visual function observed here provide new evidence in support of recent electrophysiological studies suggesting that different types of meditation and training duration lead to distinguishable short- and long-term changes at the neural level [5Lehmann D. Faber P.L. Achermann P. Jeanmonod D. Gianotti R.R. Pizzagalli D. Brain sources of EEG gamma frequency during volitionally meditation-induced, altered states of consciousness, and experience of the self.Psychiatry Res. 2001; 108: 111-121Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (119) Google Scholar, 7Lutz A. Greischar L.L. Rawlings N.B. Ricard M. Davidson R. Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004; 101: 16369-16373Crossref PubMed Scopus (679) Google Scholar]. Furthermore, the reported association between ‘focused’ styles of meditation and changes in neural activity in prefrontal regions of the cortex [7Lutz A. Greischar L.L. Rawlings N.B. Ricard M. Davidson R. Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004; 101: 16369-16373Crossref PubMed Scopus (679) Google Scholar, 8Newberg A. Alavi A. Baime M. Pourdehnad M. Santanna J. d’Aquili E. The measurement of regional cerebral blood flow during the complex cognitive task of meditation: a preliminary SPECT study.Psychiatry Res. 2001; 106: 113-122Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (309) Google Scholar] — regions that have been similarly implicated in sustained attentional [9Pardo J.V. Fox P.T. Raichle M.E. Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography.Nature. 1991; 349: 61-64Crossref PubMed Scopus (1075) Google Scholar] and binocular rivalry [10Lumer E.D. Friston K.J. Rees G. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain.Science. 1998; 280: 1930-1934Crossref PubMed Scopus (576) Google Scholar] — supports claims of high-level, top-down modulatory effects in perceptual rivalry [2Blake R. Logothetis N. Visual competition.Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002; 3: 13-21Crossref PubMed Scopus (959) Google Scholar], and strengthens recent links between rivalry and attentional mechanisms [4Mitchell J. Stoner G. Reynolds J. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.Nature. 2004; 429: 410-413Crossref PubMed Scopus (182) Google Scholar]. This study offers an initial contribution towards increased understanding of the biological processes underlying meditation and rivalry, while additionally highlighting the synergistic potential for further exchange between practitioners of meditation and neuroscience in the common goal of understanding consciousness. This investigation was financially supported by the Heffter Research Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, and a Stanley Foundation grant to J. D. Pettigrew. We would like to thank His Holiness the Dalai Lama for his support and help in facilitating the study, Tenzin Geyche and Tenzin Sherab for essential logistical assistance and Tsering Topgyal for recruitment of monks. We would also like to thank Tashi Choephel, Kelsang Wangmo, Ngodup Burkhar, Tenzin Sherab and Dorjee Dhondup who assisted with Tibetan and Ladakhi translations and the monks from the Institute of Buddhist Dialectics and the Namgyal and Thiksey monasteries for their participation." @default.
• W2003131878 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003131878 creator A5036583551 @default.
• W2003131878 creator A5038982631 @default.
• W2003131878 creator A5043185492 @default.
• W2003131878 creator A5045797852 @default.
• W2003131878 creator A5059805587 @default.
• W2003131878 creator A5060157509 @default.
• W2003131878 date "2005-06-01" @default.
• W2003131878 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2003131878 title "Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks" @default.
• W2003131878 cites W1633039535 @default.
• W2003131878 cites W1991434325 @default.
• W2003131878 cites W2012183985 @default.
• W2003131878 cites W2013290816 @default.
• W2003131878 cites W2025338613 @default.
• W2003131878 cites W2069954052 @default.
• W2003131878 cites W2142679134 @default.
• W2003131878 cites W2146590513 @default.
• W2003131878 cites W2165337576 @default.
• W2003131878 cites W4211057129 @default.
• W2003131878 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.043" @default.
• W2003131878 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15936259" @default.
• W2003131878 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2003131878 type Work @default.
• W2003131878 sameAs 2003131878 @default.
• W2003131878 citedByCount "199" @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782012 @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782013 @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782014 @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782015 @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782016 @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782017 @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782018 @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782019 @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782020 @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782021 @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782022 @default.
• W2003131878 countsByYear W20031318782023 @default.
• W2003131878 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003131878 hasAuthorship W2003131878A5036583551 @default.
• W2003131878 hasAuthorship W2003131878A5038982631 @default.
• W2003131878 hasAuthorship W2003131878A5043185492 @default.
• W2003131878 hasAuthorship W2003131878A5045797852 @default.
• W2003131878 hasAuthorship W2003131878A5059805587 @default.
• W2003131878 hasAuthorship W2003131878A5060157509 @default.
• W2003131878 hasBestOaLocation W20031318781 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C188147891 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C2779602485 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C521822307 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C75699723 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C139719470 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C15744967 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C162324750 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C166957645 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C169760540 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C180747234 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C188147891 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C26760741 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C2779602485 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C521822307 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C75699723 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C86803240 @default.
• W2003131878 hasConceptScore W2003131878C95457728 @default.
• W2003131878 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W2003131878 hasLocation W20031318781 @default.
• W2003131878 hasLocation W20031318782 @default.
• W2003131878 hasLocation W20031318783 @default.
• W2003131878 hasOpenAccess W2003131878 @default.
• W2003131878 hasPrimaryLocation W20031318781 @default.
• W2003131878 hasRelatedWork W1992096192 @default.
• W2003131878 hasRelatedWork W1993618065 @default.
• W2003131878 hasRelatedWork W2072863075 @default.
• W2003131878 hasRelatedWork W2092235704 @default.
• W2003131878 hasRelatedWork W2118280160 @default.
• W2003131878 hasRelatedWork W2127755047 @default.
• W2003131878 hasRelatedWork W2204668899 @default.
• W2003131878 hasRelatedWork W2599968701 @default.
• W2003131878 hasRelatedWork W2811122426 @default.
• W2003131878 hasRelatedWork W3154642196 @default.
• W2003131878 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W2003131878 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2003131878 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2003131878 magId "2003131878" @default.
• W2003131878 workType "article" @default.