Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003134039> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 61 of
61
with 100 items per page.
- W2003134039 endingPage "144" @default.
- W2003134039 startingPage "134" @default.
- W2003134039 abstract "More and more papers are published in medical journals every day, so how do you decide which ones to read and, having read a paper, how do you decide whether to change your practice as a result of what you have read? Perhaps the paper was atypical in some way. What does the other research on the topic say?The purpose of systematic reviews is to summarise all the available, high-quality evidence that can be found on a particular topic. A narrative review, in which an expert can cite a selection of papers that support a particular viewpoint, says very little about the papers that do not. In contrast, a systematic review involves a search for all available literature, whatever the findings may be.Systematic reviews start with a well-defined clinical question, and aim to identify, appraise, synthesise and then apply all the available good-quality evidence that can be found (published or unpublished) that is relevant to the question. In particular, Cochrane systematic reviews have to meet a defined set of quality standards and the authors and editors set out to make them the best around. They are the current gold standard in the systematic review field.The Cochrane Collaboration is an international group which is now 20 years old. The collaboration depends upon the voluntary contribution of thousands of authors and is supported by editorial bases and methodologists. In the UK, these bases are supported by funding from the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), and any funding for editorial bases must be free from commercial interests. Review groups are divided up into areas of clinical interest and, within the respiratory field, there are groups for lung cancer (based in France), acute respiratory infections (based in Australia), cystic fibrosis (based in the UK) and airways (based in the UK …" @default.
- W2003134039 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2003134039 creator A5008326946 @default.
- W2003134039 creator A5015655411 @default.
- W2003134039 creator A5065716950 @default.
- W2003134039 date "2014-06-01" @default.
- W2003134039 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2003134039 title "How to make sense of a Cochrane systematic review" @default.
- W2003134039 doi "https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.003514" @default.
- W2003134039 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2003134039 type Work @default.
- W2003134039 sameAs 2003134039 @default.
- W2003134039 citedByCount "6" @default.
- W2003134039 countsByYear W20031340392014 @default.
- W2003134039 countsByYear W20031340392016 @default.
- W2003134039 countsByYear W20031340392018 @default.
- W2003134039 countsByYear W20031340392021 @default.
- W2003134039 countsByYear W20031340392022 @default.
- W2003134039 countsByYear W20031340392023 @default.
- W2003134039 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2003134039 hasAuthorship W2003134039A5008326946 @default.
- W2003134039 hasAuthorship W2003134039A5015655411 @default.
- W2003134039 hasAuthorship W2003134039A5065716950 @default.
- W2003134039 hasBestOaLocation W20031340391 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConcept C143141573 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConceptScore W2003134039C119599485 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConceptScore W2003134039C127413603 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConceptScore W2003134039C143141573 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConceptScore W2003134039C17744445 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConceptScore W2003134039C189708586 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConceptScore W2003134039C199539241 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConceptScore W2003134039C2779473830 @default.
- W2003134039 hasConceptScore W2003134039C41008148 @default.
- W2003134039 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2003134039 hasLocation W20031340391 @default.
- W2003134039 hasOpenAccess W2003134039 @default.
- W2003134039 hasPrimaryLocation W20031340391 @default.
- W2003134039 hasRelatedWork W2037111888 @default.
- W2003134039 hasRelatedWork W2096946506 @default.
- W2003134039 hasRelatedWork W2350741829 @default.
- W2003134039 hasRelatedWork W2358668433 @default.
- W2003134039 hasRelatedWork W2376932109 @default.
- W2003134039 hasRelatedWork W2382290278 @default.
- W2003134039 hasRelatedWork W2390279801 @default.
- W2003134039 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2003134039 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2003134039 hasRelatedWork W3170014661 @default.
- W2003134039 hasVolume "10" @default.
- W2003134039 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2003134039 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2003134039 magId "2003134039" @default.
- W2003134039 workType "article" @default.