FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003146527> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003146527 endingPage "203" @default.
• W2003146527 startingPage "191" @default.
• W2003146527 abstract "The Watershed Restoration Program (WRP) in British Columbia was initiated under the auspices of Forest Renewal B.C. to restore, protect and maintain fisheries, aquatic and forest resources adversely impacted by past forest-harvesting practices, by carrying out community-based remedial work on hillslopes and streams. Specific restoration components focus on impacted hillslopes, gullies, riparian areas, stream channels and fish habitat. Fish habitat restoration is typically carried out after an assessment of upslope risks (followed by rehabilitation) and instream conditions. Restoration techniques include restoring fish access, streambank stabilization, rehabilitating channelled reaches to provide fish holding pools and riffles, re-establishing instream cover and structure by addition of boulder clusters and large woody debris (LWD), restoring and creating off-channel habitat, and resupply of nutrients. After the restoration work is completed, research evaluation and operational monitoring are conducted to determine the overall success and ultimate benefit of the work. Research evaluation is not project-specific, but may involve evaluation of a specific technique (e.g., LWD placements), and synoptic studies and ’paired assessments’ of experimental control and treatment streams. Routine and project effectiveness monitoring is project-specific and is carried out after the instream work is completed and has passed post-construction inspection. Routine monitoring is a low intensity activity to determine functionality and condition of the restoration works. It is mainly a visual activity, and may include simple measurements or indicators (e.g., for structural stability), and can be undertaken on an annual basis or after each major storm. Project effectiveness monitoring is of higher intensity, and is conducted on a selected sub-set of projects where there are uncertainties of outcome or adaptive management benefits. This monitoring typically includes fish sampling and physical measurements: pool widths and depths, stream gradient, channel form, and channel substrate characteristics. Engineering level surveys (to tie bed and water surface elevations and cross sections to a specific benchmark) are frequently required for quantitative comparisons of restoration works (before, as-constructed and post-restoration). Where possible, project effectiveness monitoring should be related to published estimates of increases in fish abundance due to habitat improvements (bio-standards) established during the planning and prescriptive phase. Evaluation and monitoring of fish habitat restoration projects, both in the shorter and longer term, are essential to improve biological, technical and cost effectiveness of projects, and to identify and incorporate innovations. Evaluation techniques described in the paper were developed to evaluate activities to restore streams impacted by past logging practices, but the underlying principles apply to stream restoration wherever forest, urban or agriculture practices have resulted in stream and riparian impairment." @default.
• W2003146527 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003146527 creator A5019521747 @default.
• W2003146527 creator A5038378107 @default.
• W2003146527 creator A5040925260 @default.
• W2003146527 creator A5051105797 @default.
• W2003146527 date "1998-01-01" @default.
• W2003146527 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2003146527 title "TECHNIQUES TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FISH HABITAT RESTORATION WORKS IN STREAMS IMPACTED BY LOGGING ACTIVITIES" @default.
• W2003146527 cites W1978271710 @default.
• W2003146527 cites W1982735290 @default.
• W2003146527 cites W2008145789 @default.
• W2003146527 cites W2073868051 @default.
• W2003146527 cites W2216351798 @default.
• W2003146527 cites W2905748390 @default.
• W2003146527 doi "https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj2302191" @default.
• W2003146527 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2003146527 type Work @default.
• W2003146527 sameAs 2003146527 @default.
• W2003146527 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2003146527 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003146527 hasAuthorship W2003146527A5019521747 @default.
• W2003146527 hasAuthorship W2003146527A5038378107 @default.
• W2003146527 hasAuthorship W2003146527A5040925260 @default.
• W2003146527 hasAuthorship W2003146527A5051105797 @default.
• W2003146527 hasBestOaLocation W20031465271 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C110872660 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C11731853 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C125620115 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C150547873 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C24037442 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C2779099003 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C2781018910 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C42090638 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C73935091 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C76886044 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C78437154 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C83873828 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConcept C97137747 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C107826830 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C110872660 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C11731853 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C119857082 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C125620115 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C127413603 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C150547873 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C185933670 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C187320778 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C18903297 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C205649164 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C24037442 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C2779099003 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C2781018910 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C31258907 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C39432304 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C41008148 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C42090638 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C73935091 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C76886044 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C78437154 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C83873828 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C86803240 @default.
• W2003146527 hasConceptScore W2003146527C97137747 @default.
• W2003146527 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2003146527 hasLocation W20031465271 @default.
• W2003146527 hasOpenAccess W2003146527 @default.
• W2003146527 hasPrimaryLocation W20031465271 @default.
• W2003146527 hasRelatedWork W150410233 @default.
• W2003146527 hasRelatedWork W2003075149 @default.
• W2003146527 hasRelatedWork W2024768996 @default.
• W2003146527 hasRelatedWork W2039732036 @default.
• W2003146527 hasRelatedWork W2074720145 @default.
• W2003146527 hasRelatedWork W2080608502 @default.
• W2003146527 hasRelatedWork W2100486445 @default.
• W2003146527 hasRelatedWork W2113921773 @default.
• W2003146527 hasRelatedWork W2231067827 @default.
• W2003146527 hasRelatedWork W4310289086 @default.
• W2003146527 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W2003146527 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2003146527 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2003146527 magId "2003146527" @default.
• W2003146527 workType "article" @default.