FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003156761> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003156761 endingPage "514" @default.
• W2003156761 startingPage "507" @default.
• W2003156761 abstract "Introduction The force applied to the teeth is a variable of orthodontic treatment that can be controlled. Poor control of the applied force can lead to adverse biologic effects as well as undesirable tooth movements. The selected archwire-bracket combination is a primary determining factor in the force level applied to a tooth during orthodontic treatment. The aim of this research was to use an experimental biomechanical setup to measure forces generated during complex orthodontic tooth movements with various archwire-bracket combinations. Methods The materials consisted of 3 types of 0.022-in slot orthodontic brackets: (1) conventional brackets (Victory Series [3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif] and Mini-Taurus [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, Colo]), (2) self-ligating brackets (SmartClip [3M Unitek] and Time3 [American Orthodontics, Shegoygan, Wis]), and (3) a conventional low-friction bracket (Synergy [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics]); and 4 archwire types: (1) 0.012-in stainless steel (3M Unitek), (2) 0.0155-in coaxial (Advanced Orthodontics [Näpflein, Düsseldorf, Germany]), (3) 0.012-in Orthonol (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics), and (4) 0.012-in Thermalloy (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics). Stainless steel ligatures and elastomeric rings were used. The materials were used in different combinations in a simulated malocclusion that represented a maxillary central incisor displaced 2 mm gingivally (x-axis) and 2 mm labially (z-axis). Results The lowest forces were measured when the brackets were combined with either the coaxial or the Thermalloy archwires; the forces ranged from 3.4 ± 0.2 to 0.7 ± 0.1 N in the x-axis direction, and from 4.5 ± 0.3 to 0.5 ± 0.1 N in the z-axis direction. The highest forces were measured in combination with stainless steel archwires; the forces ranged from 6.3 ± 0.3 to 3.0 ± 0.1 N in the x-axis direction, and from 6.3 ± 0.3 to 1.7 ± 0.1 N in the z-axis direction. Conclusions We recommend 0.0155-in coaxial and 0.012-in Thermalloy archwires for leveling and alignment. Elastomeric rings, when used with conventional brackets, increased the force applied to the teeth. The force applied to the teeth is a variable of orthodontic treatment that can be controlled. Poor control of the applied force can lead to adverse biologic effects as well as undesirable tooth movements. The selected archwire-bracket combination is a primary determining factor in the force level applied to a tooth during orthodontic treatment. The aim of this research was to use an experimental biomechanical setup to measure forces generated during complex orthodontic tooth movements with various archwire-bracket combinations. The materials consisted of 3 types of 0.022-in slot orthodontic brackets: (1) conventional brackets (Victory Series [3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif] and Mini-Taurus [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, Colo]), (2) self-ligating brackets (SmartClip [3M Unitek] and Time3 [American Orthodontics, Shegoygan, Wis]), and (3) a conventional low-friction bracket (Synergy [Rocky Mountain Orthodontics]); and 4 archwire types: (1) 0.012-in stainless steel (3M Unitek), (2) 0.0155-in coaxial (Advanced Orthodontics [Näpflein, Düsseldorf, Germany]), (3) 0.012-in Orthonol (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics), and (4) 0.012-in Thermalloy (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics). Stainless steel ligatures and elastomeric rings were used. The materials were used in different combinations in a simulated malocclusion that represented a maxillary central incisor displaced 2 mm gingivally (x-axis) and 2 mm labially (z-axis). The lowest forces were measured when the brackets were combined with either the coaxial or the Thermalloy archwires; the forces ranged from 3.4 ± 0.2 to 0.7 ± 0.1 N in the x-axis direction, and from 4.5 ± 0.3 to 0.5 ± 0.1 N in the z-axis direction. The highest forces were measured in combination with stainless steel archwires; the forces ranged from 6.3 ± 0.3 to 3.0 ± 0.1 N in the x-axis direction, and from 6.3 ± 0.3 to 1.7 ± 0.1 N in the z-axis direction. We recommend 0.0155-in coaxial and 0.012-in Thermalloy archwires for leveling and alignment. Elastomeric rings, when used with conventional brackets, increased the force applied to the teeth." @default.
• W2003156761 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003156761 creator A5011673344 @default.
• W2003156761 creator A5014110308 @default.
• W2003156761 creator A5021485040 @default.
• W2003156761 creator A5024392255 @default.
• W2003156761 creator A5074979196 @default.
• W2003156761 creator A5084523151 @default.
• W2003156761 date "2013-04-01" @default.
• W2003156761 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2003156761 title "Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets" @default.
• W2003156761 cites W192288960 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W1964991994 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W1967654423 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W1969730427 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W1989207005 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2022327819 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2051152361 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2055776174 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2063965273 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2074902238 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2075767067 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2079310032 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2080411099 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2091941306 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2097343126 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2110851291 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2111292014 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2118570744 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2123386542 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2127878764 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2146151880 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2146219643 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2150849345 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2155823519 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2160342842 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2162683257 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2164117369 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2166932999 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2169130864 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2171585078 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W2336433389 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W4254845739 @default.
• W2003156761 cites W5148932 @default.
• W2003156761 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.020" @default.
• W2003156761 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23561412" @default.
• W2003156761 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2003156761 type Work @default.
• W2003156761 sameAs 2003156761 @default.
• W2003156761 citedByCount "28" @default.
• W2003156761 countsByYear W20031567612014 @default.
• W2003156761 countsByYear W20031567612015 @default.
• W2003156761 countsByYear W20031567612016 @default.
• W2003156761 countsByYear W20031567612017 @default.
• W2003156761 countsByYear W20031567612018 @default.
• W2003156761 countsByYear W20031567612019 @default.
• W2003156761 countsByYear W20031567612020 @default.
• W2003156761 countsByYear W20031567612021 @default.
• W2003156761 countsByYear W20031567612022 @default.
• W2003156761 countsByYear W20031567612023 @default.
• W2003156761 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003156761 hasAuthorship W2003156761A5011673344 @default.
• W2003156761 hasAuthorship W2003156761A5014110308 @default.
• W2003156761 hasAuthorship W2003156761A5021485040 @default.
• W2003156761 hasAuthorship W2003156761A5024392255 @default.
• W2003156761 hasAuthorship W2003156761A5074979196 @default.
• W2003156761 hasAuthorship W2003156761A5084523151 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConcept C133769200 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConcept C159824338 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConcept C2780109367 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConceptScore W2003156761C127413603 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConceptScore W2003156761C133769200 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConceptScore W2003156761C159824338 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConceptScore W2003156761C192562407 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConceptScore W2003156761C199343813 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConceptScore W2003156761C2780109367 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConceptScore W2003156761C29694066 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConceptScore W2003156761C66938386 @default.
• W2003156761 hasConceptScore W2003156761C71924100 @default.
• W2003156761 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2003156761 hasLocation W20031567611 @default.
• W2003156761 hasLocation W20031567612 @default.
• W2003156761 hasOpenAccess W2003156761 @default.
• W2003156761 hasPrimaryLocation W20031567611 @default.
• W2003156761 hasRelatedWork W2003156761 @default.
• W2003156761 hasRelatedWork W2048703365 @default.
• W2003156761 hasRelatedWork W2075195966 @default.
• W2003156761 hasRelatedWork W2081300848 @default.
• W2003156761 hasRelatedWork W2201996617 @default.
• W2003156761 hasRelatedWork W2413010225 @default.
• W2003156761 hasRelatedWork W2939143066 @default.
• W2003156761 hasRelatedWork W3019802816 @default.

• next