Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003188860> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2003188860 endingPage "849" @default.
- W2003188860 startingPage "830" @default.
- W2003188860 abstract "To prospectively assess accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in preoperative assessment of local extent of breast cancer.Institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were obtained. Results of bilateral mammography, US, and contrast-enhanced MR imaging were analyzed from 111 consecutive women with known or suspected invasive breast cancer. Results were correlated with histopathologic findings.Analysis included 177 malignant foci in 121 cancerous breasts, of which 89 (50%) foci were palpable. Median size of 139 invasive foci was 18 mm (range, 2-107 mm). Mammographic sensitivity decreased from 100% in fatty breasts to 45% in extremely dense breasts. Mammographic sensitivity was highest for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in 89 of 110 (81%) cases versus 10 of 29 (34%) cases of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) (P < .001) and 21 of 38 (55%) cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (P < .01). US showed higher sensitivity than did mammography for IDC, depicting 104 of 110 (94%) cases, and for ILC, depicting 25 of 29 (86%) cases (P < .01 for each). US showed higher sensitivity for invasive cancer than DCIS (18 of 38 [47%], P < .001). MR showed higher sensitivity than did mammography for all tumor types (P < .01) and higher sensitivity than did US for DCIS (P < .001), depicting 105 of 110 (95%) cases of IDC, 28 of 29 (96%) cases of ILC, and 34 of 38 (89%) cases of DCIS. In anticipation of conservation or no surgery after mammography and clinical examination in 96 breasts, additional tumor (which altered surgical approach) was present in 30. Additional tumor was depicted in 17 of 96 (18%) breasts at US and in 29 of 96 (30%) at MR, though extent was now overestimated in 12 of 96 (12%) at US and 20 of 96 (21%) at MR imaging. After combined mammography, clinical examination, and US, MR depicted additional tumor in another 12 of 96 (12%) breasts and led to overestimation of extent in another six (6%); US showed no detection benefit after MR imaging. Bilateral cancer was present in 10 of 111 (9%) patients; contralateral tumor was depicted mammographically in six and with both US and MR in an additional three. One contralateral cancer was demonstrated only clinically.In nonfatty breasts, US and MR imaging were more sensitive than mammography for invasive cancer, but both MR imaging and US involved risk of overestimation of tumor extent. Combined mammography, clinical examination, and MR imaging were more sensitive than any other individual test or combination of tests." @default.
- W2003188860 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2003188860 creator A5003113772 @default.
- W2003188860 creator A5015224720 @default.
- W2003188860 creator A5023138767 @default.
- W2003188860 creator A5051624908 @default.
- W2003188860 creator A5058867183 @default.
- W2003188860 creator A5060609060 @default.
- W2003188860 creator A5086327633 @default.
- W2003188860 date "2004-12-01" @default.
- W2003188860 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2003188860 title "Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer" @default.
- W2003188860 cites W1594506041 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W1902892164 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W1923770335 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W1930652016 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W1975999486 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W1978532431 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W1980527762 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W1988431813 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W1989743586 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W1992588691 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W1998550745 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2001445530 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2005627941 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2007455663 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2008467746 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2010115307 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2014116133 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2017584872 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2024032595 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2026277000 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2027189792 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2028787200 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2030198777 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2035901146 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2047106888 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2057672387 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2058033719 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2058456483 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2062444881 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2066920146 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2078800479 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2083108248 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2090677839 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2094838815 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2097974869 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2100159406 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2103658773 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2105120592 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2106624401 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2111978764 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2120438529 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2121086185 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2128474175 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2131478273 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2131739776 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2131869653 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2133646007 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2133848650 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2142634790 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2146047807 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2147079867 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2147132538 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2147415913 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2155085757 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2158732932 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2158996150 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2164747948 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2172261736 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W2312528226 @default.
- W2003188860 cites W4240563447 @default.
- W2003188860 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2333031484" @default.
- W2003188860 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15486214" @default.
- W2003188860 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W2003188860 type Work @default.
- W2003188860 sameAs 2003188860 @default.
- W2003188860 citedByCount "1236" @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602012 @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602013 @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602014 @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602015 @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602016 @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602017 @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602018 @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602019 @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602020 @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602021 @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602022 @default.
- W2003188860 countsByYear W20031888602023 @default.
- W2003188860 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2003188860 hasAuthorship W2003188860A5003113772 @default.
- W2003188860 hasAuthorship W2003188860A5015224720 @default.
- W2003188860 hasAuthorship W2003188860A5023138767 @default.
- W2003188860 hasAuthorship W2003188860A5051624908 @default.
- W2003188860 hasAuthorship W2003188860A5058867183 @default.
- W2003188860 hasAuthorship W2003188860A5060609060 @default.
- W2003188860 hasAuthorship W2003188860A5086327633 @default.