FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003232255> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003232255 endingPage "183" @default.
• W2003232255 startingPage "167" @default.
• W2003232255 abstract "Purpose Nearly all legal firms and in‐house counsels will have to consider the opportunities and risks afforded by the rapidly changing legal process outsourcing (LPO) market, estimated to be worth $2.4bn globally, and growing rapidly. The purpose of this Industry Insight is to assess the current LPO provider landscape by analyzing data on 27 LPO providers. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyzed LPO provider data collected in 2011 by Orbys, a leading sourcing and transformation advisory firm based in Europe. The 27 providers in the sample include specialist LPO providers, full service LPO providers, and global BPO providers that offer LPO services. The authors assessed LPO provider services, provider competencies, geographic location, pricing, team composition, and staff turnover rates. Findings The LPO providers in the sample provide a variety of services, including litigation, intellectual property, corporate, compliance, procurement, employment, property, and consulting services. LPO providers allocated most of their human resources to litigation (26 percent), intellectual property (14 percent) and corporate/compliance (12 percent) services. LPO providers balance team composition – the percentage of onshore resources located close to the client versus offshore resources in low‐cost locations – to reduce client costs while still delivering quality services. The average team composition average was 22 percent of resources onshore and 78 percent of resources offshore, mostly in India. The authors also analyzed LPO prices by skill level and location. For example, the average daily rate for a fully qualified lawyer based in India was $248. LPO provider turnover rates ranged from 3 percent to 34 percent, with an average turnover of 15 percent. Practical implications This research on the LPO provider landscape helps to inform potential clients about LPO services and the global LPO landscape. The authors also identify three practices to help clients achieve success with LPO engagements. First, consider overall value, not just price. Second, mediate the effects of high LPO provider turnover. Third, assess and develop client‐retained capabilities, because outsourcing legal services is not about abdicating responsibility, but about learning to manage legal services in a different way. Originality/value Legal process outsourcing is the next evolution in the provision of services. Because the LPO market is less mature than the information technology outsourcing (ITO) and business process outsourcing (BPO) markets, very little research has been done on LPO in general or on LPO provider capabilities specifically. This Industry Insight helps to bridge the knowledge gap." @default.
• W2003232255 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003232255 creator A5019533456 @default.
• W2003232255 creator A5081080352 @default.
• W2003232255 date "2013-06-21" @default.
• W2003232255 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2003232255 title "Legal process outsourcing: the provider landscape" @default.
• W2003232255 cites W1935776778 @default.
• W2003232255 cites W1975004384 @default.
• W2003232255 cites W1993890103 @default.
• W2003232255 cites W2004628232 @default.
• W2003232255 cites W2032548309 @default.
• W2003232255 cites W2081744238 @default.
• W2003232255 cites W2099055477 @default.
• W2003232255 cites W2115118291 @default.
• W2003232255 cites W2494398006 @default.
• W2003232255 cites W4254516712 @default.
• W2003232255 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/so-11-2012-0021" @default.
• W2003232255 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2003232255 type Work @default.
• W2003232255 sameAs 2003232255 @default.
• W2003232255 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2003232255 countsByYear W20032322552014 @default.
• W2003232255 countsByYear W20032322552015 @default.
• W2003232255 countsByYear W20032322552017 @default.
• W2003232255 countsByYear W20032322552019 @default.
• W2003232255 countsByYear W20032322552020 @default.
• W2003232255 countsByYear W20032322552022 @default.
• W2003232255 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003232255 hasAuthorship W2003232255A5019533456 @default.
• W2003232255 hasAuthorship W2003232255A5081080352 @default.
• W2003232255 hasConcept C116537 @default.
• W2003232255 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2003232255 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2003232255 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W2003232255 hasConcept C46934059 @default.
• W2003232255 hasConceptScore W2003232255C116537 @default.
• W2003232255 hasConceptScore W2003232255C144133560 @default.
• W2003232255 hasConceptScore W2003232255C162853370 @default.
• W2003232255 hasConceptScore W2003232255C2780378061 @default.
• W2003232255 hasConceptScore W2003232255C46934059 @default.
• W2003232255 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2003232255 hasLocation W20032322551 @default.
• W2003232255 hasOpenAccess W2003232255 @default.
• W2003232255 hasPrimaryLocation W20032322551 @default.
• W2003232255 hasRelatedWork W1485394083 @default.
• W2003232255 hasRelatedWork W1971624849 @default.
• W2003232255 hasRelatedWork W2071846685 @default.
• W2003232255 hasRelatedWork W2084977337 @default.
• W2003232255 hasRelatedWork W2256865597 @default.
• W2003232255 hasRelatedWork W2276626205 @default.
• W2003232255 hasRelatedWork W2356162574 @default.
• W2003232255 hasRelatedWork W2392993499 @default.
• W2003232255 hasRelatedWork W2416219097 @default.
• W2003232255 hasRelatedWork W2474512756 @default.
• W2003232255 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W2003232255 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2003232255 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2003232255 magId "2003232255" @default.
• W2003232255 workType "article" @default.