FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003316973> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003316973 endingPage "511" @default.
• W2003316973 startingPage "503" @default.
• W2003316973 abstract "Background Patients and surgeons can feel uncomfortable discussing coping strategies, psychological distress, and stressful circumstances. It has been suggested that patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) facilitate the discussion of factors associated with increased symptoms and disability. This study assessed the effect of providing feedback to patients regarding their coping strategy and illness behavior on patient satisfaction and patient-physician communication in orthopedic surgery. Methods In a prospective study, 136 orthopedic patients were randomly assigned to either receive feedback about the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference computer-adaptive test (CAT) prior to the visit with the hand surgeon or not. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction with the consultation and secondary outcomes involved patient-physician communication. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the influence of the feedback on patient satisfaction and communication. Results There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between patients who received feedback and patients who did not ( P=0.70). Feedback was associated with more frequent discussion of coping strategies ( P=0.045) in bivariate analysis but was not independently associated: in multivariable analysis, only PROMIS Pain Interference CAT and age were identified as independent predictors (odds ratio (OR) 1.1; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.0–1.1, P=0.013, and OR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.94–0.99, P=0.032, respectively). No factors were associated with discussion of stressors. Discussion of circumstances was independently associated with increased PROMIS Pain Interference CAT, marital status, and work status. Conclusion We found that feedback regarding coping strategies and illness behavior using the PROMIS Pain Interference CAT did not affect patient satisfaction. Although feedback was associated with increased discussion of illness behavior in bivariate analysis, less effective coping strategies and personal factors (age, marital status, and work status) were more important factors." @default.
• W2003316973 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003316973 creator A5001712245 @default.
• W2003316973 creator A5008734244 @default.
• W2003316973 creator A5028932290 @default.
• W2003316973 creator A5032780937 @default.
• W2003316973 creator A5036922202 @default.
• W2003316973 date "2015-02-18" @default.
• W2003316973 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2003316973 title "The Effect of Feedback regarding Coping Strategies and Illness Behavior on Hand Surgery Patient Satisfaction and Communication: A Randomized Controlled Trial" @default.
• W2003316973 cites W12526583 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W169735066 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1942815422 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1963854579 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1969493791 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1974756279 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1977609381 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1982656230 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1983718152 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1984222453 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1985131992 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1985564128 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1986547300 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1987902383 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1992499676 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1994801476 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W1995250611 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2019187412 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2030727452 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2031153532 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2032527834 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2044084101 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2045940291 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2047101195 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2049998466 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2050229206 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2053689306 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2053993519 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2058767401 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2070579999 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2070642183 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2071662733 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2071869284 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2072988251 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2076343760 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2078774864 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2082092389 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2082206651 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2082528287 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2084526288 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2097405398 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2097408032 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2099842004 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2101770009 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2102506369 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2105545850 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2115495766 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2123809604 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2124601383 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2130896241 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2131717785 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2132645452 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2139209101 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2146640492 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2157860211 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2160948831 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2313987504 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W2328152251 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W330546578 @default.
• W2003316973 cites W50621839 @default.
• W2003316973 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-015-9742-2" @default.
• W2003316973 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4551630" @default.
• W2003316973 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26330786" @default.
• W2003316973 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2003316973 type Work @default.
• W2003316973 sameAs 2003316973 @default.
• W2003316973 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2003316973 countsByYear W20033169732017 @default.
• W2003316973 countsByYear W20033169732018 @default.
• W2003316973 countsByYear W20033169732019 @default.
• W2003316973 countsByYear W20033169732020 @default.
• W2003316973 countsByYear W20033169732021 @default.
• W2003316973 countsByYear W20033169732022 @default.
• W2003316973 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003316973 hasAuthorship W2003316973A5001712245 @default.
• W2003316973 hasAuthorship W2003316973A5008734244 @default.
• W2003316973 hasAuthorship W2003316973A5028932290 @default.
• W2003316973 hasAuthorship W2003316973A5032780937 @default.
• W2003316973 hasAuthorship W2003316973A5036922202 @default.
• W2003316973 hasBestOaLocation W20033169732 @default.
• W2003316973 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2003316973 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2003316973 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2003316973 hasConcept C139265228 @default.
• W2003316973 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2003316973 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2003316973 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2003316973 hasConcept C17744445 @default.

• next