FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003328262> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003328262 endingPage "962" @default.
• W2003328262 startingPage "956" @default.
• W2003328262 abstract "OBJECTIVES: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) emphasizes the importance of medical trainees meeting specific performance benchmarks and demonstrating readiness for unsupervised practice. The aim of this study was to examine the readiness of Gastroenterology (GI) fellowship programs for competency-based evaluation in endoscopic procedural training. METHODS: ACGME-accredited GI program directors (PDs) and GI trainees nationwide completed an online survey of domains relevant to endoscopy training and competency assessment. Participants were queried about current methods and perceived quality of endoscopy training and assessment of competence. Participants were also queried about factors deemed important in endoscopy competence assessment. Five-point Likert items were analyzed as continuous variables by an independentt-test andχ2-test was used for comparison of proportions. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 64% (94/148) for PDs and 47% (546/1,167) for trainees. Twenty-three percent of surveyed PDs reported that they do not have a formal endoscopy curriculum. PDs placed less importance (1—very important to 5—very unimportant) on endoscopy volume (1.57 vs. 1.18,P<0.001), adenoma detection rate (2.00 vs. 1.53,P<0.001), and withdrawal times (1.96 vs. 1.68,P=0.009) in determining endoscopy competence compared with trainees. A majority of PDs report that competence is assessed by procedure volume (85%) and teaching attending evaluations (96%). Only a minority of programs use skills assessment tools (30%) or specific quality metrics (28%). Specific competencies are mostly assessed by individual teaching attending feedback as opposed to official documentation or feedback from a PD. PDs rate the overall quality of their endoscopy training and assessment of competence as better than overall ratings by trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of PDs and trainees nationwide believe that measuring specific metrics is important in determining endoscopy competence, most programs still rely on procedure volume and subjective attending evaluations to determine overall competence. As medical training transitions from an apprenticeship model to competency-based education, there is a need for improved endoscopy curricula which are better suited to demonstrate readiness for unsupervised practice." @default.
• W2003328262 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003328262 creator A5003602083 @default.
• W2003328262 creator A5005400957 @default.
• W2003328262 creator A5007181969 @default.
• W2003328262 creator A5008519932 @default.
• W2003328262 creator A5009585712 @default.
• W2003328262 creator A5013805028 @default.
• W2003328262 creator A5025399531 @default.
• W2003328262 creator A5040166748 @default.
• W2003328262 creator A5072634224 @default.
• W2003328262 creator A5078332522 @default.
• W2003328262 creator A5086466627 @default.
• W2003328262 date "2015-07-01" @default.
• W2003328262 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2003328262 title "Status of Competency-Based Medical Education in Endoscopy Training: A Nationwide Survey of US ACGME-Accredited Gastroenterology Training Programs" @default.
• W2003328262 cites W1964413484 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W1967952962 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W1970303894 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W1978972307 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W1988333055 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2010863029 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2026924234 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2049167607 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2058395827 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2066639061 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2078172407 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2081177807 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2089290423 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2093274439 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2100618270 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2111147183 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2115592235 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2137229802 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2151255896 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2157641530 @default.
• W2003328262 cites W2162269410 @default.
• W2003328262 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.24" @default.
• W2003328262 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27125721" @default.
• W2003328262 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2003328262 type Work @default.
• W2003328262 sameAs 2003328262 @default.
• W2003328262 citedByCount "61" @default.
• W2003328262 countsByYear W20033282622015 @default.
• W2003328262 countsByYear W20033282622016 @default.
• W2003328262 countsByYear W20033282622017 @default.
• W2003328262 countsByYear W20033282622018 @default.
• W2003328262 countsByYear W20033282622019 @default.
• W2003328262 countsByYear W20033282622020 @default.
• W2003328262 countsByYear W20033282622021 @default.
• W2003328262 countsByYear W20033282622022 @default.
• W2003328262 countsByYear W20033282622023 @default.
• W2003328262 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003328262 hasAuthorship W2003328262A5003602083 @default.
• W2003328262 hasAuthorship W2003328262A5005400957 @default.
• W2003328262 hasAuthorship W2003328262A5007181969 @default.
• W2003328262 hasAuthorship W2003328262A5008519932 @default.
• W2003328262 hasAuthorship W2003328262A5009585712 @default.
• W2003328262 hasAuthorship W2003328262A5013805028 @default.
• W2003328262 hasAuthorship W2003328262A5025399531 @default.
• W2003328262 hasAuthorship W2003328262A5040166748 @default.
• W2003328262 hasAuthorship W2003328262A5072634224 @default.
• W2003328262 hasAuthorship W2003328262A5078332522 @default.
• W2003328262 hasAuthorship W2003328262A5086466627 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C22156102 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C2779767262 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C100521375 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C126322002 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C15744967 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C19417346 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C19527891 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C199360897 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C22156102 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C2778451229 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C2779767262 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C41008148 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C47177190 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C509550671 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C512399662 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C56666940 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C61521584 @default.
• W2003328262 hasConceptScore W2003328262C71924100 @default.

• next