FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003383737> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003383737 endingPage "14" @default.
• W2003383737 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2003383737 abstract "Guns And The Constitution:A Complex Relationship Sanford Levinson (bio) Saul Cornell. A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. xvi + 270pp. Notes and index. $30.00. Mark V. Tushnet. Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can’t End the Battle Over Guns. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. xix + 156pp. Notes and index. $19.95. Saul Cornell has written an unusually illuminating book about various conceptions of the right to bear arms especially between the Revolution and the end of Reconstruction. Mark Tushnet has written an equally illuminating book about the contemporary debate over gun rights and gun control that concludes that the kinds of evidence that Cornell brings forth is highly unlikely in fact to change anyone's mind with regard to that issue. Agreeing with an argument most elaborately set forth by Yale law professor Dan Kahan and Donald Braman, Tushnet believes that debates surrounding guns are best understood in terms of basic cultural divides within the United States.1 As such, scholarly evidence is largely irrelevant or, which is much the same thing, likely to be perceived through the filters that cultural divides, by definition, provide as means of understanding the contexts within which we live. Whatever one thinks of the contemporary debate over guns, historians are properly interested in trying to figure out what can be discerned from the past, independently of lessons it might teach us for the present. Cornell is a skilled discerner, especially of complexity. His book will scarcely be the last word on the topic, but it will certainly become an essential first word, at least among secondary sources, that historians will want to consult as they traverse the intellectual minefield that surrounds any examination of the role of firearms in American society or law. First, though, it is worth mentioning a couple of things that A Well-Regulated Militia is not. Although, as shall be noted presently, Cornell finds a close connection between eighteenth-century notions of militias and civic-republican political theory on the obligations of citizens to protect the public realm against [End Page 1] oppression, he makes no attempt to elaborate that theory. One will not, for example, find either Machiavelli or James Harrington in the index, nor is there any significant treatment of the various colonial theorists (or, more accurately, publicists) who imported civil republicanism to the New World. For that important topic, one is well advised to read not only J. A. G. Pocock's seminal work on the Machiavellian moment in Anglo-American thought, but also the far more recent and specific book by the late Richard Uviller and William Merkel, The Militia and the Right to Arms: Or How the Second Amendment Fell Silent, which does a superb job of detailing this history.2 Nor is Cornell especially interested in the new social history, that is, the detailed examination of records that might enable us to know how many Americans, from what groups and social classes, actually possessed firearms. (And, even if they possessed then, how reliable were they as weapons?) Michael Bellesiles's ill-fated book, whatever its manifest deficiencies regarding some of his purported evidence, asked many important questions.3 Cornell does a fine job in answering the questions he asks, but no one should confuse his book with a comprehensive treatment of the empirical actualities of arms even during his primary period of study, the Revolution through Reconstruction. Cornell almost literally begins his book with the angry response by many Bostonians to the attempted British seizure in June 1768 of John Hancock's sloop Liberty, which in turn helped to generate the occupation of Boston by British soldiers (pp. 9–13). Samuel Adams raised the possibility that Bostonians should behave like men and take up arms immediately to fight for their liberty (p. 10). It is therefore basically presented as a given that by the decade prior to Revolution, many American colonists, for whom Adams serves as a synecdoche, believed, whatever the particular source of their confidence, that they did indeed have a right not only to possess arms but also, more importantly, to use them in..." @default.
• W2003383737 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003383737 creator A5012076696 @default.
• W2003383737 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W2003383737 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2003383737 title "Guns And The Constitution: A Complex Relationship" @default.
• W2003383737 cites W1529418490 @default.
• W2003383737 cites W1534854312 @default.
• W2003383737 cites W188372414 @default.
• W2003383737 cites W2151586248 @default.
• W2003383737 cites W2258225484 @default.
• W2003383737 cites W2921048094 @default.
• W2003383737 cites W3124555919 @default.
• W2003383737 cites W576010943 @default.
• W2003383737 cites W855568229 @default.
• W2003383737 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2008.0017" @default.
• W2003383737 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2003383737 type Work @default.
• W2003383737 sameAs 2003383737 @default.
• W2003383737 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2003383737 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003383737 hasAuthorship W2003383737A5012076696 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConcept C2778627824 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConcept C2780534388 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConceptScore W2003383737C144024400 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConceptScore W2003383737C166957645 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConceptScore W2003383737C17744445 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConceptScore W2003383737C185592680 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConceptScore W2003383737C199539241 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConceptScore W2003383737C2776154427 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConceptScore W2003383737C2778627824 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConceptScore W2003383737C2780534388 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConceptScore W2003383737C55493867 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConceptScore W2003383737C95457728 @default.
• W2003383737 hasConceptScore W2003383737C98184364 @default.
• W2003383737 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2003383737 hasLocation W20033837371 @default.
• W2003383737 hasOpenAccess W2003383737 @default.
• W2003383737 hasPrimaryLocation W20033837371 @default.
• W2003383737 hasRelatedWork W2258393733 @default.
• W2003383737 hasRelatedWork W23434918 @default.
• W2003383737 hasRelatedWork W2350705178 @default.
• W2003383737 hasRelatedWork W2370687026 @default.
• W2003383737 hasRelatedWork W2382779672 @default.
• W2003383737 hasRelatedWork W2501341542 @default.
• W2003383737 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2003383737 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2003383737 hasRelatedWork W4235458916 @default.
• W2003383737 hasRelatedWork W2890240976 @default.
• W2003383737 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W2003383737 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2003383737 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2003383737 magId "2003383737" @default.
• W2003383737 workType "article" @default.