FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W200344008> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W200344008 endingPage "257" @default.
• W200344008 startingPage "242" @default.
• W200344008 abstract "One of more pronounced shifts in British historical thought in last quarter-century has been re-interpretation of English Reformation. What was once presented as swift and sure Protestant transformation that swept all of England has lately appeared as slow, controversial, and not immediately successful process. The work of A. G. Dickens and Geoffrey Elton, which portrayed speedy Reformation, has lost favor among ecclesiastical historians.1 The emphasis now, as demonstrated by Eamon Duffy's massive The Stripping of Altars, lies less on reform than on resistance.2 An even more recent revisionist effort is Christopher Haigh's English Reformations: Religion, Politics and Society under Tudors, which is product of two decades spent slowing down Reformation.3 Haigh has identified several Reformations as Protestantism and Catholicism, matched more evenly than previously supposed, battled fiercely until Elizabeth's accession. After 1558 Protestantism slowly consolidated its hold, aided both by enthusiastic preachers and government support. Yet old practices did not subside easily To quote Patrick Collinson, who has chronicled rise of Puritan evangelicals: It is only with 1570s that historically minded insomniac goes to sleep counting Catholics rather than Protestants, since only then did they begin to find themselves in situation.4 The debate over speed and strength of English Reformation has produced related debate over nature of English Catholicism in sixteenth century, particularly after Elizabethan Settlement. As views of Reformation have changed, so have ideas about those Catholics who were objects of reform. There is widespread agreement that, after 1559, there emerged separated, sacramental sustained largely by members of gentry within their households and reliant on services of household and roving priests.5 John Bossy's landmark work, English Catholic Community 1570-1850 (Oxford, 1976), has been foundation for such an assessment. Since 1976, however, ecclesiastical historians have divided over questions of origins and membership of such community. This review will explore and compare arguments of past twenty years on three issues central to dialogue: emphasis on in origins of post-Reformation community, and roles of two groups within this body:church-papists and various missionary movements in England. The standard study of English Catholicism had been Bishop David Mathew's, which stressed the of an English Catholic tradition... descended from More through Campion and Sir Thomas Tresham and solid Cavalier Catholics of country party.6 More had fathered this tradition, and various staunch conservatives had adhered to it in decade after 1559 until its rejuvenation by missionaries.7 For Mathew post-Reformation Catholicism was part of larger, more amorphous tradition which had survived upheavals of sixteenth century. Two works, both published in 1976, fundamentally challenged this notion. In The English Catholic Community, Bossy declared that post-Reformation Catholicism did not represent continuation of traditional English Catholicism. More, Mary, and Cardinal Pole were part of posthumous history of `medieval' Christendom in England, and only a fragmentary continuity existed between Marian, hierarchical church and missionary construction which succeeded it.8 Rather, after 1570, arriving missionary priests, including Jesuits and others trained at new Continental seminaries, had engineered creation of totally new, separated, self-defined minority sect or small nonconforming community.9 English Catholics, usually gathered in and around gentry households, effected their religious separation, with encouragement of missionaries, by concentration on sacramental life within these households (in Bossy's words: the rites of passage) and, more importantly, by practice of recusancy, willful non-attendance at established Church services. …" @default.
• W200344008 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W200344008 creator A5041222543 @default.
• W200344008 date "2000-01-01" @default.
• W200344008 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W200344008 title "Recusants, Church-Papists, and Comfortable Missionaries: Assessing the Post-Reformation English Catholic Community" @default.
• W200344008 cites W1492468866 @default.
• W200344008 cites W1539797408 @default.
• W200344008 cites W1541087175 @default.
• W200344008 cites W1964455743 @default.
• W200344008 cites W1967553922 @default.
• W200344008 cites W1970263205 @default.
• W200344008 cites W1972114658 @default.
• W200344008 cites W1982005972 @default.
• W200344008 cites W1985367743 @default.
• W200344008 cites W1990815237 @default.
• W200344008 cites W1991800541 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2001197800 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2003421416 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2017137533 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2017749356 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2032142447 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2034669882 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2038711768 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2053076794 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2054385557 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2057704852 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2072684218 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2082585511 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2089839734 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2122382605 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2125455916 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2133336428 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2139690363 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2164937951 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2171740506 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2330513397 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2481339191 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2796099654 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2799138565 @default.
• W200344008 cites W3195518927 @default.
• W200344008 cites W426367755 @default.
• W200344008 cites W589724638 @default.
• W200344008 cites W620887176 @default.
• W200344008 cites W2496048019 @default.
• W200344008 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cat.2000.0188" @default.
• W200344008 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W200344008 type Work @default.
• W200344008 sameAs 200344008 @default.
• W200344008 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W200344008 countsByYear W2003440082015 @default.
• W200344008 countsByYear W2003440082020 @default.
• W200344008 countsByYear W2003440082022 @default.
• W200344008 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W200344008 hasAuthorship W200344008A5041222543 @default.
• W200344008 hasConcept C111021475 @default.
• W200344008 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W200344008 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W200344008 hasConcept C2781129162 @default.
• W200344008 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W200344008 hasConceptScore W200344008C111021475 @default.
• W200344008 hasConceptScore W200344008C138885662 @default.
• W200344008 hasConceptScore W200344008C27206212 @default.
• W200344008 hasConceptScore W200344008C2781129162 @default.
• W200344008 hasConceptScore W200344008C95457728 @default.
• W200344008 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W200344008 hasLocation W2003440081 @default.
• W200344008 hasOpenAccess W200344008 @default.
• W200344008 hasPrimaryLocation W2003440081 @default.
• W200344008 hasRelatedWork W1974658027 @default.
• W200344008 hasRelatedWork W1979845975 @default.
• W200344008 hasRelatedWork W2011210269 @default.
• W200344008 hasRelatedWork W2027109448 @default.
• W200344008 hasRelatedWork W2032080965 @default.
• W200344008 hasRelatedWork W2119955831 @default.
• W200344008 hasRelatedWork W2588490991 @default.
• W200344008 hasRelatedWork W2767157266 @default.
• W200344008 hasRelatedWork W4233399577 @default.
• W200344008 hasRelatedWork W751471606 @default.
• W200344008 hasVolume "86" @default.
• W200344008 isParatext "false" @default.
• W200344008 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W200344008 magId "200344008" @default.
• W200344008 workType "article" @default.