FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003445088> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003445088 endingPage "493" @default.
• W2003445088 startingPage "484" @default.
• W2003445088 abstract "Bechelli C, Zecchi Orlandini S, Colafranceschi M. Scanning electron microscope study on the efficacy of root canal wall debridement of hand versus Lightspeed instrumentation. International Endodontic Journal, 32, 484–493 1999. Aim The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the efficacy of root canal wall debridement following hand versus LightSpeedTM instrumentation. Methodology Twenty recently extracted single-rooted teeth were paired and randomly placed into two treatment groups of 10 teeth each. In group 1, a step-back instrumentation without initial coronal flaring with stainless steel Hedstroem files was used; group 2 was instrumented with Ni-Ti LightSpeedTM instru-ments. Both groups had the same irrigation regimen: 2.5% NaOCl and a 15% EDTA solution. The teeth were then decoronated and each root split longitudinally into two halves to be examined using the scanning electron microscope (SEM). The presence of superficial debris and smear layer was evaluated by a standardized grading system, and the resulting scores submitted to nonparametric statistics. Results Under the conditions of this study, the removal of superficial debris was generally excellent with both canal preparation techniques. Both techniques resulted in variable presence of residual smear layer, with a canal wall covered by smear layer as the predominant characteristic. Generally, the amount of smear layer was greater in the apical than in the middle third of the root, however, this difference was statistically significant (P 0.005) only in hand-instrumented teeth. The use of LightSpeedTM instruments was associated with significantly more (P 0.05) smear layer presence in the middle region of the root when compared with hand instrumentation. In addition, less smear layer was present in the apical region following LightSpeedTM instrumentation than stainless steel hand files, but this difference was not statistically significant. Differences in debridement between the two halves of the same root were more evident with LightSpeedTM than manual instrumentation, however, there was no statistical significance. Conclusions It may be inferred that the choice between hand and LightSpeedTM instrumentation should be based on factors other than the amount of root canal debridement, which does not vary significantly according to the instruments used." @default.
• W2003445088 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003445088 creator A5017973129 @default.
• W2003445088 creator A5071168217 @default.
• W2003445088 creator A5086488356 @default.
• W2003445088 date "1999-11-01" @default.
• W2003445088 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2003445088 title "Scanning electron microscope study on the efficacy of root canal wall debridement of hand versus Lightspeed instrumentation" @default.
• W2003445088 cites W1965537577 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W1966171393 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W1968120786 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W1969123501 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W1974977075 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W1976723873 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2016267280 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2042643187 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2064971083 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2071642995 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2075296689 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2081114733 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2081209870 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2081415640 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2086961904 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2092601092 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2121937899 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2125388166 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2142836911 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2159921752 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W2171831849 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W4231938834 @default.
• W2003445088 cites W4251144723 @default.
• W2003445088 doi "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00250.x" @default.
• W2003445088 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10709497" @default.
• W2003445088 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W2003445088 type Work @default.
• W2003445088 sameAs 2003445088 @default.
• W2003445088 citedByCount "38" @default.
• W2003445088 countsByYear W20034450882013 @default.
• W2003445088 countsByYear W20034450882014 @default.
• W2003445088 countsByYear W20034450882015 @default.
• W2003445088 countsByYear W20034450882016 @default.
• W2003445088 countsByYear W20034450882017 @default.
• W2003445088 countsByYear W20034450882018 @default.
• W2003445088 countsByYear W20034450882020 @default.
• W2003445088 countsByYear W20034450882021 @default.
• W2003445088 countsByYear W20034450882022 @default.
• W2003445088 countsByYear W20034450882023 @default.
• W2003445088 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003445088 hasAuthorship W2003445088A5017973129 @default.
• W2003445088 hasAuthorship W2003445088A5071168217 @default.
• W2003445088 hasAuthorship W2003445088A5086488356 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C118530786 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C26771246 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C2777438270 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C2778492126 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C2779747767 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C111919701 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C118530786 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C159985019 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C192562407 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C199343813 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C26771246 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C2777438270 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C2778492126 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C2779747767 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C29694066 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C41008148 @default.
• W2003445088 hasConceptScore W2003445088C71924100 @default.
• W2003445088 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2003445088 hasLocation W20034450881 @default.
• W2003445088 hasLocation W20034450882 @default.
• W2003445088 hasOpenAccess W2003445088 @default.
• W2003445088 hasPrimaryLocation W20034450881 @default.
• W2003445088 hasRelatedWork W1965953661 @default.
• W2003445088 hasRelatedWork W1996512009 @default.
• W2003445088 hasRelatedWork W2015730503 @default.
• W2003445088 hasRelatedWork W2095038214 @default.
• W2003445088 hasRelatedWork W2144992737 @default.
• W2003445088 hasRelatedWork W2350377663 @default.
• W2003445088 hasRelatedWork W2392381665 @default.
• W2003445088 hasRelatedWork W3016502246 @default.
• W2003445088 hasRelatedWork W4255565531 @default.
• W2003445088 hasRelatedWork W2772598917 @default.
• W2003445088 hasVolume "32" @default.
• W2003445088 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2003445088 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2003445088 magId "2003445088" @default.
• W2003445088 workType "article" @default.