FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003458199> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003458199 endingPage "143" @default.
• W2003458199 startingPage "137" @default.
• W2003458199 abstract "Objectives Structured programs for routine pain assessment and treatment are necessary to optimize care for residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). A pilot study was designed to develop, implement, and evaluate a system for pain assessment and monitoring in a LTCF. Additional goals were to determine whether a verbal and/or non-verbal tool adequately assess pain in residents of LTCFs and whether the pharmacologic therapy for pain changes with the implementation of a pain assessment and monitoring system. Design Quantitative, nonexperimental design using two pain assessment tools. Setting The study was conducted at a LTCF in a rural midwestern setting. Participants The study population for phase I included residents on any pain medication (regularly scheduled or as needed) on the secure dementia unit. The target population for phase II consisted of residents on any pain medication on an open unit. Intervention Training was provided to the nursing staff on how to use two pain assessment tools, one verbal (colored visual analog scale) and one nonverbal (observed pain target behaviors), and documentation. In addition, a continuing education program on pain assessment and management in elderly residents and barriers to pain management in LTCFs was offered to medical providers. Measurements Evaluation with the colored visual analog scale (CVAS) occurred twice daily. Pain target behaviors were monitored throughout the day and recorded by nursing staff at the end of each shift. All residents in the study population were monitored daily for six months. Results Most of the residents on both units were unable to use the verbal tool; however, the nonverbal tool was used successfully for all residents studied. On the dementia unit, the use of pain medications increased, and pain target behaviors decreased during the study period; on the open unit, the use of pain medications remained stable, and pain target behaviors decreased. Conclusion These data suggest that an increase in awareness of pain may facilitate an improvement in the assessment and management of pain in residents of LTCFs. The feasibility of the nonverbal pain monitoring method shown in this study has positive implications on quality of care issues if generalizable to a larger population. Structured programs for routine pain assessment and treatment are necessary to optimize care for residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). A pilot study was designed to develop, implement, and evaluate a system for pain assessment and monitoring in a LTCF. Additional goals were to determine whether a verbal and/or non-verbal tool adequately assess pain in residents of LTCFs and whether the pharmacologic therapy for pain changes with the implementation of a pain assessment and monitoring system. Quantitative, nonexperimental design using two pain assessment tools. The study was conducted at a LTCF in a rural midwestern setting. The study population for phase I included residents on any pain medication (regularly scheduled or as needed) on the secure dementia unit. The target population for phase II consisted of residents on any pain medication on an open unit. Training was provided to the nursing staff on how to use two pain assessment tools, one verbal (colored visual analog scale) and one nonverbal (observed pain target behaviors), and documentation. In addition, a continuing education program on pain assessment and management in elderly residents and barriers to pain management in LTCFs was offered to medical providers. Evaluation with the colored visual analog scale (CVAS) occurred twice daily. Pain target behaviors were monitored throughout the day and recorded by nursing staff at the end of each shift. All residents in the study population were monitored daily for six months. Most of the residents on both units were unable to use the verbal tool; however, the nonverbal tool was used successfully for all residents studied. On the dementia unit, the use of pain medications increased, and pain target behaviors decreased during the study period; on the open unit, the use of pain medications remained stable, and pain target behaviors decreased. These data suggest that an increase in awareness of pain may facilitate an improvement in the assessment and management of pain in residents of LTCFs. The feasibility of the nonverbal pain monitoring method shown in this study has positive implications on quality of care issues if generalizable to a larger population." @default.
• W2003458199 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003458199 creator A5000613492 @default.
• W2003458199 creator A5032459742 @default.
• W2003458199 creator A5048811804 @default.
• W2003458199 creator A5049118311 @default.
• W2003458199 creator A5051829320 @default.
• W2003458199 creator A5057924821 @default.
• W2003458199 date "2005-03-01" @default.
• W2003458199 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2003458199 title "Methods of pain assessment in residents of long-term care facilities: A pilot study" @default.
• W2003458199 cites W1965569837 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2009591946 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2014677193 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2024501220 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2036191769 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2036702768 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2038542381 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2038877876 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2054882214 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2058287005 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2065167866 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2068923100 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2070925920 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2117436750 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W2160674109 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W4237856069 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W4245112387 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W4253136113 @default.
• W2003458199 cites W4300477649 @default.
• W2003458199 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2004.12.024" @default.
• W2003458199 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15871890" @default.
• W2003458199 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2003458199 type Work @default.
• W2003458199 sameAs 2003458199 @default.
• W2003458199 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2003458199 countsByYear W20034581992012 @default.
• W2003458199 countsByYear W20034581992015 @default.
• W2003458199 countsByYear W20034581992018 @default.
• W2003458199 countsByYear W20034581992020 @default.
• W2003458199 countsByYear W20034581992022 @default.
• W2003458199 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003458199 hasAuthorship W2003458199A5000613492 @default.
• W2003458199 hasAuthorship W2003458199A5032459742 @default.
• W2003458199 hasAuthorship W2003458199A5048811804 @default.
• W2003458199 hasAuthorship W2003458199A5049118311 @default.
• W2003458199 hasAuthorship W2003458199A5051829320 @default.
• W2003458199 hasAuthorship W2003458199A5057924821 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C2778282284 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C2779483572 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C2780233487 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C2983098980 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C79544238 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C14184104 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C142724271 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C159110408 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C1862650 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C199360897 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C2778282284 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C2779134260 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C2779483572 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C2780233487 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C2908647359 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C2983098980 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C41008148 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C56666940 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C71924100 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C79544238 @default.
• W2003458199 hasConceptScore W2003458199C99454951 @default.
• W2003458199 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2003458199 hasLocation W20034581991 @default.
• W2003458199 hasLocation W20034581992 @default.
• W2003458199 hasOpenAccess W2003458199 @default.
• W2003458199 hasPrimaryLocation W20034581991 @default.
• W2003458199 hasRelatedWork W1757203700 @default.
• W2003458199 hasRelatedWork W1978273123 @default.
• W2003458199 hasRelatedWork W2027645612 @default.
• W2003458199 hasRelatedWork W2078272386 @default.
• W2003458199 hasRelatedWork W2301256891 @default.
• W2003458199 hasRelatedWork W2417908656 @default.
• W2003458199 hasRelatedWork W2977418185 @default.
• W2003458199 hasRelatedWork W4241471773 @default.
• W2003458199 hasRelatedWork W4297621684 @default.
• W2003458199 hasRelatedWork W632434550 @default.
• W2003458199 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W2003458199 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2003458199 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next