FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003528862> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003528862 endingPage "12" @default.
• W2003528862 startingPage "2" @default.
• W2003528862 abstract "The surgical options for hallux rigidus in the presence of painful but moderate degenerative metatarsophalangeal joint disease are limited to either joint-destructive or joint-preserving procedures. The following study compared the effectiveness of 2 joint-preservation procedures. Forty-nine patients, with a mean age of 53 years, underwent phalangeal osteotomy and were reviewed at an average 29 months postoperatively. A subsequent group of 59 patients, with a mean age of 51 years, underwent first metatarsal decompression osteotomy and were reviewed at an average 15 months postoperatively. In the phalangeal osteotomy group, 65% of patients were completely satisfied, 24% were satisfied with reservation, and 11% were dissatisfied. Three patients suffered continued metatarsophalangeal joint pain, 3 developed hallux interphalangeal joint pain, and 4 patients developed transfer metatarsalgia. The postoperative decrease from 36° to 35° in mean peak hallux dorsiflexion on walking was not significant. In the first metatarsal decompression osteotomy group, 54% were completely satisfied, 13.5% were satisfied with reservations, and 32% were dissatisfied. Continued metatarsophalangeal joint pain occurred in 2 patients, 18 developed transfer metatarsalgia, and 6 of these patients required lesser metatarsal osteotomy. Peak hallux dorsiflexion during walking increased from 36° to 42° (P < .001). First metatarsal decompression osteotomy will increase joint range of motion but the risk of complication and patient dissatisfaction is less after phalangeal osteotomy. Neither procedure could be considered definitive for hallux rigidus. The surgical options for hallux rigidus in the presence of painful but moderate degenerative metatarsophalangeal joint disease are limited to either joint-destructive or joint-preserving procedures. The following study compared the effectiveness of 2 joint-preservation procedures. Forty-nine patients, with a mean age of 53 years, underwent phalangeal osteotomy and were reviewed at an average 29 months postoperatively. A subsequent group of 59 patients, with a mean age of 51 years, underwent first metatarsal decompression osteotomy and were reviewed at an average 15 months postoperatively. In the phalangeal osteotomy group, 65% of patients were completely satisfied, 24% were satisfied with reservation, and 11% were dissatisfied. Three patients suffered continued metatarsophalangeal joint pain, 3 developed hallux interphalangeal joint pain, and 4 patients developed transfer metatarsalgia. The postoperative decrease from 36° to 35° in mean peak hallux dorsiflexion on walking was not significant. In the first metatarsal decompression osteotomy group, 54% were completely satisfied, 13.5% were satisfied with reservations, and 32% were dissatisfied. Continued metatarsophalangeal joint pain occurred in 2 patients, 18 developed transfer metatarsalgia, and 6 of these patients required lesser metatarsal osteotomy. Peak hallux dorsiflexion during walking increased from 36° to 42° (P < .001). First metatarsal decompression osteotomy will increase joint range of motion but the risk of complication and patient dissatisfaction is less after phalangeal osteotomy. Neither procedure could be considered definitive for hallux rigidus." @default.
• W2003528862 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003528862 creator A5016976698 @default.
• W2003528862 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W2003528862 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2003528862 title "Phalangeal osteotomy versus first metatarsal decompression osteotomy for the surgical treatment of hallux rigidus: A prospective study of age-matched and condition-matched patients" @default.
• W2003528862 cites W1904077183 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W1913929158 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W1954314538 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W1996229412 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2002511583 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2011890923 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2012367919 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2052827195 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2064182914 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2067165136 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2082342902 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2130684169 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2190710375 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2223265057 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W22408156 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2257330208 @default.
• W2003528862 cites W2798642733 @default.
• W2003528862 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2004.11.013" @default.
• W2003528862 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15704077" @default.
• W2003528862 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2003528862 type Work @default.
• W2003528862 sameAs 2003528862 @default.
• W2003528862 citedByCount "71" @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622012 @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622013 @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622014 @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622015 @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622016 @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622017 @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622018 @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622019 @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622020 @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622021 @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622022 @default.
• W2003528862 countsByYear W20035288622023 @default.
• W2003528862 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003528862 hasAuthorship W2003528862A5016976698 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C2776389721 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C2776577363 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C2777434363 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C2780626206 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C2780930691 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C2781298600 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C141071460 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C142724271 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C204787440 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C2776389721 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C2776577363 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C2777434363 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C2780626206 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C2780930691 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C2781298600 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C60465272 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C71924100 @default.
• W2003528862 hasConceptScore W2003528862C81182388 @default.
• W2003528862 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2003528862 hasLocation W20035288621 @default.
• W2003528862 hasLocation W20035288622 @default.
• W2003528862 hasOpenAccess W2003528862 @default.
• W2003528862 hasPrimaryLocation W20035288621 @default.
• W2003528862 hasRelatedWork W192988817 @default.
• W2003528862 hasRelatedWork W2003528862 @default.
• W2003528862 hasRelatedWork W2046603894 @default.
• W2003528862 hasRelatedWork W2092386273 @default.
• W2003528862 hasRelatedWork W2127795808 @default.
• W2003528862 hasRelatedWork W2279183931 @default.
• W2003528862 hasRelatedWork W2554736978 @default.
• W2003528862 hasRelatedWork W2588912526 @default.
• W2003528862 hasRelatedWork W2982566130 @default.
• W2003528862 hasRelatedWork W42190403 @default.
• W2003528862 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W2003528862 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2003528862 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2003528862 magId "2003528862" @default.
• W2003528862 workType "article" @default.