FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003845764> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003845764 endingPage "154" @default.
• W2003845764 startingPage "131" @default.
• W2003845764 abstract "New internet technologies have created a revolutionary new platform which allows consumers to make decision about product price and quality quickly and provides information about themselves through the transcript of online reviews. By expressing their feelings toward products or services on virtual opinion platforms, users extend their influence into cyberspace as electronic word-of-mouth (e-WOM). Existing research indicates that an impact of eWOM on the consumer decision process is influential. For both academic researchers and practitioners, investigating this phenomenon of information sharing in online website is essential given the increasing number of consumers using them as sources of purchase decisions. It is worthwhile to examine the extent to which opinion seekers are willing to accept and adopt online reviews and which factors encourage adoption. Discerning the most motivating aspects of information adoption in particular, could help electronic marketers better promote their brand and presence on the internet. The objectives of this study are to investigate how online WOM influences a persons’ purchase decision by discovering which factors encourage information adoption. Especially focused on the self-efficacy, this research investigates how self-efficacy affects on information usefulness and adoption of online information. Although people are exposed to same review or comment about product or service, some accept the reviews while others do not. We notice that accepting online reviews mainly depends on the person’s preference or personal characteristics. This study empirically examines this issue by using cognitive dissonance theory. Specifically, in the movie industry, we address few questions–is always positive WOM generating positive effect? What if the movie isn’t the person’s favorite genre? What if the person who is very self-assertive so doesn’t take other’s opinion easily? In these cases of cognitive dissonance, is always WOM generating same result? While many studies have focused on one direct of WOM which indicates positive (or negative) informative reviews or comments generate positive (or negative) results and more (or less) profits, this study investigates not only directional properties of WOM but also how people change their opinion towards product or service positive to negative, negative to positive through the online WOM. An experiment was conducted quantitatively by using a sample of 168 users who have experience within the online movie review site, ‘Naver Movie’. Users were required to complete a survey regarding reviews and comments taken from the real movie page. The data reflected user’s perceptions of online WOM information that determined users’ adoption level. Analysis results provide empirical support for the proposed theoretical perspective. When user can’t agree with the opinion of online WOM information, in other words, when cognitive dissonance between online WOM information and users’ preference occurs, perceived self-efficacy significantly decreases customers’ perception of usefulness. And this perception of usefulness plays an important role in determining users’ intention to adopt online WOM information. Most of researches have been concentrated on characteristics of online WOM itself such as quality or vividness of information, credibility of source and direction of online WOM, etc. for describing effect of online WOM, but our results suggest that users’ personal character (e.g., self-efficacy) plays decisive role for acceptance of online WOM information. Higher self-efficacy means lower possibility to accept the information that represents counter opinion because of cognitive dissonance, whereas the people that have lower self-efficacy are willing to accept the online WOM information as true and refer to purchase decision. This study suggests a model for understanding role of direction of online WOM information. Also, our result implicates the importance of online review supervision and personalized information service by confirming switching opinion negative to positive is more difficult than positive to negative through the online WOM information. This implication would help marketers to manage online reviews of their products or services." @default.
• W2003845764 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003845764 creator A5017844127 @default.
• W2003845764 creator A5035517651 @default.
• W2003845764 creator A5050277676 @default.
• W2003845764 creator A5087337598 @default.
• W2003845764 date "2013-09-30" @default.
• W2003845764 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2003845764 title "Investigating the Influence of Perceived Usefulness and Self-Efficacy on Online WOM Adoption Based on Cognitive Dissonance Theory: Stick to Your Own Preference VS. Follow What Others Said" @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1539416494 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1547192935 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1562208008 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1574235309 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1585073700 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1597676647 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1791587663 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1967270708 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1967717271 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1973400909 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1974216635 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W1979907230 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2040686047 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2047313348 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2047818421 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2052513630 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2058559948 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2059179344 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2095916595 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2099594827 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2105399863 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2118898598 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2120115642 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2125326971 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2126512988 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2128734027 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2129692524 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2132454116 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2146982538 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2157300266 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2159775157 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2167325287 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2168569455 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2179683524 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2317461390 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2318837501 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2322233365 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2412877489 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2789794978 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2809941406 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2811096735 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2903232939 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2913407902 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2990867988 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W3121284197 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W3124901488 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W3134413281 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W398777897 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W69895720 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W190529148 @default.
• W2003845764 cites W2166048859 @default.
• W2003845764 doi "https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2013.23.3.131" @default.
• W2003845764 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2003845764 type Work @default.
• W2003845764 sameAs 2003845764 @default.
• W2003845764 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2003845764 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003845764 hasAuthorship W2003845764A5017844127 @default.
• W2003845764 hasAuthorship W2003845764A5035517651 @default.
• W2003845764 hasAuthorship W2003845764A5050277676 @default.
• W2003845764 hasAuthorship W2003845764A5087337598 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConcept C113445564 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConcept C77513098 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConceptScore W2003845764C113445564 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConceptScore W2003845764C15744967 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConceptScore W2003845764C162324750 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConceptScore W2003845764C169760540 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConceptScore W2003845764C169900460 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConceptScore W2003845764C175444787 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConceptScore W2003845764C2781249084 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConceptScore W2003845764C77513098 @default.
• W2003845764 hasConceptScore W2003845764C77805123 @default.
• W2003845764 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2003845764 hasLocation W20038457641 @default.
• W2003845764 hasOpenAccess W2003845764 @default.
• W2003845764 hasPrimaryLocation W20038457641 @default.
• W2003845764 hasRelatedWork W1589843187 @default.
• W2003845764 hasRelatedWork W1875767891 @default.
• W2003845764 hasRelatedWork W1983378891 @default.
• W2003845764 hasRelatedWork W2002573506 @default.
• W2003845764 hasRelatedWork W2066248714 @default.
• W2003845764 hasRelatedWork W2084380130 @default.

• next