FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003874157> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003874157 endingPage "A86" @default.
• W2003874157 startingPage "A85" @default.
• W2003874157 abstract "Background Self-reported physical activity equivalent to at least 2 h a week is associated with reduction in the risk of hospital admission and death in COPD.[1][1] However, whether self reported activity is accurate in COPD is uncertain. The gold standard objective measures of physical activity in daily life are direct observation and assessment of energy expenditure by calorimetry or the doubly labelled water method.[2][2] We sought to test the validity of a home activity monitor (Actigraph)—for measurement of physical activity levels by comparing to calorimetry, the 6MWT and an activity questionnaire.Methods 20 patients with COPD and five healthy elderly subjects underwent home activity monitoring over a period of 5 days, a 6MWT and were questioned twice regarding activity levels using the modified Baecke questionnaire (MBQ).[3][3] Time spent non-sedentary according to the Actigraph was compared to perceived activity from the MBQ and 6MWT. A sub-group also underwent concurrent measurement of energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry and the Actigraph during a walk at steady state on a treadmill.Results Actigraph output is summarised in [Abstract P43 table 1][4]. MBQ score did not relate to actual time active in patients (p=0.54), and was less reproducible on retest than in controls. Furthermore when patients were ranked according to activity level by MBQ and Actigraph, it was clear that patients both under and over-estimated their activity level. Actigraph activity levels related well to 6MWT (p=0.04). Accuracy of the Actigraph at measuring energy expenditure, compared to the gold standard of calorimetry, varied with walking speed, such that it was less accurate in those walking slowly.View this table:Abstract P43 Table 1 Relationship between MBQ score and the percentage time spent sedentary . MBQ score was ranked from highest to lowest (1-20). The mean % time sedentary was ranked lowest to highest for the twenty patients. The arrows show how MBQ score rank related to mean % time sedentary. For example, the patient with the highest score on MBQ was ranked 16th in the % time sedentary, suggesting that they actually did less activity than they perceived they did. The patient who spent the least time sedentary perceived they did less activity than they actually did as they were ranked 10th for MBQ score. Nine patients (45%) over-estimated their activity level and nine under-estimated their activity level. Two patients were ranked the same for the MBQ as the Actigraph.Conclusions Patients self reported activity levels are likely to be inaccurate. Home activity monitoring is accurate at measuring exercise capacity, but not at measuring energy expenditure, due to slow speed of movement. [1]: #ref-1 [2]: #ref-2 [3]: #ref-3 [4]: #T1" @default.
• W2003874157 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003874157 creator A5002267347 @default.
• W2003874157 creator A5021878424 @default.
• W2003874157 creator A5085989387 @default.
• W2003874157 date "2011-12-01" @default.
• W2003874157 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2003874157 title "P43 Assessing the validity of a home activity monitor in patients with COPD" @default.
• W2003874157 cites W2096823672 @default.
• W2003874157 cites W2142250980 @default.
• W2003874157 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201054c.43" @default.
• W2003874157 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2003874157 type Work @default.
• W2003874157 sameAs 2003874157 @default.
• W2003874157 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2003874157 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003874157 hasAuthorship W2003874157A5002267347 @default.
• W2003874157 hasAuthorship W2003874157A5021878424 @default.
• W2003874157 hasAuthorship W2003874157A5085989387 @default.
• W2003874157 hasBestOaLocation W20038741571 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConcept C190512316 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConcept C2776780178 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConcept C2781464450 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConcept C2910454251 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConcept C2988147884 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConcept C3018396334 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConcept C3020255362 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConceptScore W2003874157C126322002 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConceptScore W2003874157C1862650 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConceptScore W2003874157C190512316 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConceptScore W2003874157C2776780178 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConceptScore W2003874157C2781464450 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConceptScore W2003874157C2910454251 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConceptScore W2003874157C2988147884 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConceptScore W2003874157C3018396334 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConceptScore W2003874157C3020255362 @default.
• W2003874157 hasConceptScore W2003874157C71924100 @default.
• W2003874157 hasIssue "Suppl 4" @default.
• W2003874157 hasLocation W20038741571 @default.
• W2003874157 hasLocation W20038741572 @default.
• W2003874157 hasOpenAccess W2003874157 @default.
• W2003874157 hasPrimaryLocation W20038741571 @default.
• W2003874157 hasRelatedWork W189113028 @default.
• W2003874157 hasRelatedWork W1988023697 @default.
• W2003874157 hasRelatedWork W2003874157 @default.
• W2003874157 hasRelatedWork W2088943744 @default.
• W2003874157 hasRelatedWork W2090342579 @default.
• W2003874157 hasRelatedWork W2119384593 @default.
• W2003874157 hasRelatedWork W2121700710 @default.
• W2003874157 hasRelatedWork W2127080439 @default.
• W2003874157 hasRelatedWork W2148164641 @default.
• W2003874157 hasRelatedWork W3142018801 @default.
• W2003874157 hasVolume "66" @default.
• W2003874157 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2003874157 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2003874157 magId "2003874157" @default.
• W2003874157 workType "article" @default.