FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2003926219> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2003926219 endingPage "260" @default.
• W2003926219 startingPage "253" @default.
• W2003926219 abstract "1. This study used 4 wheat cultivars (Brigadier, Chaucer, Consort, Reaper) from three locations (Crossnacreevy, C; Downpatrick, D; Limavady, L), which had given rise to differences in wheat specific weight (SW), to examine the relationships between apparent metabolisable energy (AME) concentration, broiler performance and wheat SW. 2. The diets contained (g/kg): wheat 744, casein 142, blended vegetable fat 50, dicalcium phosphate 22, potassium bicarbonate 10.8, sodium bicarbonate 7.5, arginine 5, methionine 2, binder 8, trace minerals/vitamins 7.2, titanium dioxide 1.5. The diets were heat-treated (80 degrees C for 2 min) prior to pelleting (3 mm die). 3. SW ranged from 63 to 77 kg/hectolitre (hl), averaging 66, 69 and 76 kg/hl at D, C and L, respectively. In vitro viscosity of the wheat samples ranged from 5.2 to 17.5 cps and thousand grain weight (TGW) from 33.4 to 47.3 g. Mean TGW was similar at C and D (38.7, 37.0 g) but higher at L (43.1 g). In vitro viscosity was similar at C and L (11.2, 10.2 cps) but somewhat higher at D (14.4 cps). Crude protein (6.25 N) ranged from 116 to 147 g/kg and tended to be higher at D. Starch, which ranged from 612 to 656 g/kg, was least at D (617 g/kg) and greatest at L (641 g/kg). 4. Crude protein, crude fibre and total non-starch polysaccharide (NSP) were negatively correlated with SW, the R2 being respectively 0.38 (P<0.05), 0.16 (NS) and 0.45 (P<0.05). TGW and starch concentration were positively correlated with SW (R2=0.70, 0.44, respectively). There was a weak (NS) negative relationship (R2=0.19) between in vitro viscosity and SW. For both TGW and in vitro viscosity, correlations improved when variety was taken into account (R2=0.95, 0.92, respectively). 5. There were no significant effects of variety on dry matter (DM) intake or live weight gain (LWG). Gain: food was significantly higher (P<0.05) for Consort than for the other three varieties and the metabolisable energy ratio (ME:GE) just failed to attain significance (P=0.062). Calculated wheat AME (MJ/kg DM) was significantly (P<0.05) higher for Consort than for the other three wheats. There was a good correlation (R2=0.49) for the total data set between gain:food and ME:GE. In vivo viscosity varied from 13.6 to 28.6 cps for individual treatments and was significantly affected by variety (P<0001). 6. Although there were no significant differences in DM intake or LWG due to site the values for L (SW 76) were 6 and 5% lower, respectively, than for D (SW 66). Gain:food was lower (P<0.05) for C (SW 69) than for D. ME:GE, wheat AME and ME:gain were not significantly different between sites. 7. There was a weak (R2=0.18) positive relationship between ME:GE and SW corresponding to a 2.5% increase in energy value for a 10 kg/hl increase in SW and no relationship between gain:food and SW. When variety was taken into the regression the slope was similar but R2 increased to 0.82. 8. ME:GE and wheat AME concentration were negatively correlated with wheat in vitro viscosity (R2=0.64, 0.55, respectively). 9. It was concluded that in vitro viscosity appears to provide a better basis than SW for prediction of the nutritive value of wheats of unknown variety. If the variety is known then SW could be used to predict energy value. However, the effect of quite a large change in SW (10 kg/hl) was relatively small." @default.
• W2003926219 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2003926219 creator A5016149546 @default.
• W2003926219 creator A5035310307 @default.
• W2003926219 creator A5064529563 @default.
• W2003926219 date "2002-05-01" @default.
• W2003926219 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2003926219 title "Effects of wheat variety and specific weight on dietary apparent metabolisable energy concentration and performance of broiler chicks" @default.
• W2003926219 cites W1994061421 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W1995768630 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2002804673 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2048127515 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2055794894 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2066904615 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2067824464 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2078985532 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2094555157 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2099213629 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2104573424 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2125650770 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2131311205 @default.
• W2003926219 cites W2152027396 @default.
• W2003926219 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120121472" @default.
• W2003926219 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12047090" @default.
• W2003926219 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2003926219 type Work @default.
• W2003926219 sameAs 2003926219 @default.
• W2003926219 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2003926219 countsByYear W20039262192012 @default.
• W2003926219 countsByYear W20039262192013 @default.
• W2003926219 countsByYear W20039262192015 @default.
• W2003926219 countsByYear W20039262192016 @default.
• W2003926219 countsByYear W20039262192017 @default.
• W2003926219 countsByYear W20039262192018 @default.
• W2003926219 countsByYear W20039262192019 @default.
• W2003926219 countsByYear W20039262192020 @default.
• W2003926219 countsByYear W20039262192023 @default.
• W2003926219 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2003926219 hasAuthorship W2003926219A5016149546 @default.
• W2003926219 hasAuthorship W2003926219A5035310307 @default.
• W2003926219 hasAuthorship W2003926219A5064529563 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConcept C147789679 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConcept C2776420369 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConcept C2780289900 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConcept C517785266 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConcept C529335014 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConceptScore W2003926219C140793950 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConceptScore W2003926219C147789679 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConceptScore W2003926219C178790620 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConceptScore W2003926219C185592680 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConceptScore W2003926219C2776420369 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConceptScore W2003926219C2780289900 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConceptScore W2003926219C31903555 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConceptScore W2003926219C517785266 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConceptScore W2003926219C529335014 @default.
• W2003926219 hasConceptScore W2003926219C86803240 @default.
• W2003926219 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2003926219 hasLocation W20039262191 @default.
• W2003926219 hasLocation W20039262192 @default.
• W2003926219 hasOpenAccess W2003926219 @default.
• W2003926219 hasPrimaryLocation W20039262191 @default.
• W2003926219 hasRelatedWork W186784337 @default.
• W2003926219 hasRelatedWork W1996664277 @default.
• W2003926219 hasRelatedWork W2068761312 @default.
• W2003926219 hasRelatedWork W2157052383 @default.
• W2003926219 hasRelatedWork W2225240249 @default.
• W2003926219 hasRelatedWork W2265743761 @default.
• W2003926219 hasRelatedWork W2952190333 @default.
• W2003926219 hasRelatedWork W3203977416 @default.
• W2003926219 hasRelatedWork W745221890 @default.
• W2003926219 hasRelatedWork W2768170769 @default.
• W2003926219 hasVolume "43" @default.
• W2003926219 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2003926219 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2003926219 magId "2003926219" @default.
• W2003926219 workType "article" @default.