FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004016061> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004016061 endingPage "408" @default.
• W2004016061 startingPage "391" @default.
• W2004016061 abstract "Abstract To identify and substantiate the correlates and antecedents of new venture performance, it is requisite to identify the most relevant performance dimensions and move toward the use of common measures of performance. Relevant, reliable, and valid measures of new venture performance are essential to explore vital relationships between independent variables and venture success and develop sound venture performance theory. In this paper we discuss three of the most common measurement approaches used in new venture performance research when only self-report data are available, and present a comparison of these approaches: (1) measuring firm performance in broadly defined categories, (2) the use of subjective measures of executive or owner satisfaction with firm performance, and (3) the use of subjective measures of firm performance relative to competitors. After discussing the relevance and potential benefits and drawbacks of each approach we use empirical data to examine and compare the availability, reliability, and relative validity of measures developed using these approaches. The sample consisted of manufacturing businesses (SIC codes 20–39) started or reorganized in the corporate form between 1980 and 1991 in nine counties in northwestern Pennsylvania's identified by a major marketing research service. Questionnaires were returned by primary respondents in 120 companies; complete matching firm performance data from a second respondent were returned for 45 of the firms. The pattern of results favors the use of two dimensions of venture performance: growth and business volume. The growth and business volume measures operationalized in this research have good availability and internal consistency and are superior to the satisfaction with performance and performance relative to competitors' scales in terms of content validity. Evidence of the external validity of the measures is provided by regression analysis showing independent variables identified and substantiated by previous research to be related to performance in the hypothesized manner. The satisfaction with performance index had a high disclosure rate, strong internal consistency, and relatively strong inter-rater reliability. There is little evidence supporting its external validity. With the exception of its negative relationship with the level of competition, none of the predicted relationships are substantiated. The performance relative to competitors' disclosure rate was somewhat lower as was the inter-rater reliability; however, it emerged as a strong independent construct with a high level of internal consistency. There was evidence for the external validity of this measure. The independent variables related to the performance relative to competitors' index are similar to those related to both the growth and business volume dimensions as predicted from previous theoretical work and research findings. In summary, this research makes several contributions to the new venture performance literature. First, when researchers are required to use self-reported measures of venture performance, growth and business volume are the dimensions of performance most familiar to and most commonly referenced by the founders. Second, it provides additional evidence for the accuracy and reliability of founder reported performance data. Third, it provides examples of specific measures with evidence that supports their relevance, availability, reliability, and validity. We believe this research can provide a base for future venture performance research. We hope that these findings will be used to help better our understanding of the dynamics impacting new venture performance and lead to improved managerial practice in emerging firms." @default.
• W2004016061 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004016061 creator A5029124157 @default.
• W2004016061 creator A5071372786 @default.
• W2004016061 date "1993-09-01" @default.
• W2004016061 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2004016061 title "Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study" @default.
• W2004016061 cites W100656795 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W1966816881 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W1972849884 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W1975433520 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W1983672501 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W1983990880 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2014611277 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2026468045 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2029367541 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2042217374 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2049510683 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2064444255 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2066414809 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2099297253 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2115535018 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2116068584 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2132656288 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2160366471 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2269728983 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2315976467 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2771384601 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2772834103 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2774605628 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W2775650992 @default.
• W2004016061 cites W3125500963 @default.
• W2004016061 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90021-v" @default.
• W2004016061 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W2004016061 type Work @default.
• W2004016061 sameAs 2004016061 @default.
• W2004016061 citedByCount "630" @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612012 @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612013 @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612014 @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612015 @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612016 @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612017 @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612018 @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612019 @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612020 @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612021 @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612022 @default.
• W2004016061 countsByYear W20040160612023 @default.
• W2004016061 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004016061 hasAuthorship W2004016061A5029124157 @default.
• W2004016061 hasAuthorship W2004016061A5071372786 @default.
• W2004016061 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2004016061 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2004016061 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2004016061 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2004016061 hasConceptScore W2004016061C144133560 @default.
• W2004016061 hasConceptScore W2004016061C162853370 @default.
• W2004016061 hasConceptScore W2004016061C2522767166 @default.
• W2004016061 hasConceptScore W2004016061C41008148 @default.
• W2004016061 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2004016061 hasLocation W20040160611 @default.
• W2004016061 hasOpenAccess W2004016061 @default.
• W2004016061 hasPrimaryLocation W20040160611 @default.
• W2004016061 hasRelatedWork W1978505276 @default.
• W2004016061 hasRelatedWork W1985655604 @default.
• W2004016061 hasRelatedWork W2032089935 @default.
• W2004016061 hasRelatedWork W2046251599 @default.
• W2004016061 hasRelatedWork W2136710333 @default.
• W2004016061 hasRelatedWork W2187644337 @default.
• W2004016061 hasRelatedWork W281246900 @default.
• W2004016061 hasRelatedWork W3015344791 @default.
• W2004016061 hasRelatedWork W3132716659 @default.
• W2004016061 hasRelatedWork W4206036160 @default.
• W2004016061 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W2004016061 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2004016061 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2004016061 magId "2004016061" @default.
• W2004016061 workType "article" @default.