FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004148522> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004148522 endingPage "1072" @default.
• W2004148522 startingPage "1066" @default.
• W2004148522 abstract "Background The aim of cardiac resynchronization therapy is correction of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. However, little is known about the optimal timing of LV and right ventricular (RV) stimulation. Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular pacing, using a range of interventricular delays in patients with advanced heart failure. Methods Twenty patients with dilated ischemic (n = 12) and idiopathic (n = 8) cardiomyopathy (age 66 ± 6 years, New York Heart Association class III–IV, LV end-diastolic diameter >55 mm, ejection fraction 22% ± 18%, and QRS 200 ± 32 ms) were implanted with a biventricular resynchronization device with sequential RV and LV timing (VV) capabilities. Tissue Doppler echocardiographic parameters were measured during sinus rhythm before implantation and following an optimal AV interval with both simultaneous and sequential biventricular pacing. The interventricular interval was modified by advancing the LV stimulus (LV first) or RV stimulus (RV first) up to 60 ms. For each stimulation protocol, standard echocardiographic Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) echo were used to measure the LV outflow tract velocity-time integral, LV filling time, intraventricular delay, and interventricular delay. Results The highest velocity-time integral was found in 12 patients with LV first stimulation, 5 patients with RV first stimulation, and 3 patients with simultaneous biventricular activation. Compared with simultaneous biventricular pacing, the optimized sequential biventricular pacing significantly increased the velocity-time integral (P <.001) and LV filling time (P = .001) and decreased interventricular delay (P = .013) and intraventricular delay (P = .010). The optimal VV interval could not be predicted by any clinical nor echocardiographic parameter. At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of nonresponders was 10%. Conclusion Optimal timing of the interventricular interval results in prolongation of the LV filling time, reduction of interventricular asynchrony, and an increase in stroke volume. In patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy, LV hemodynamics may be further improved by optimizing LV–RV delay. The aim of cardiac resynchronization therapy is correction of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. However, little is known about the optimal timing of LV and right ventricular (RV) stimulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular pacing, using a range of interventricular delays in patients with advanced heart failure. Twenty patients with dilated ischemic (n = 12) and idiopathic (n = 8) cardiomyopathy (age 66 ± 6 years, New York Heart Association class III–IV, LV end-diastolic diameter >55 mm, ejection fraction 22% ± 18%, and QRS 200 ± 32 ms) were implanted with a biventricular resynchronization device with sequential RV and LV timing (VV) capabilities. Tissue Doppler echocardiographic parameters were measured during sinus rhythm before implantation and following an optimal AV interval with both simultaneous and sequential biventricular pacing. The interventricular interval was modified by advancing the LV stimulus (LV first) or RV stimulus (RV first) up to 60 ms. For each stimulation protocol, standard echocardiographic Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) echo were used to measure the LV outflow tract velocity-time integral, LV filling time, intraventricular delay, and interventricular delay. The highest velocity-time integral was found in 12 patients with LV first stimulation, 5 patients with RV first stimulation, and 3 patients with simultaneous biventricular activation. Compared with simultaneous biventricular pacing, the optimized sequential biventricular pacing significantly increased the velocity-time integral (P <.001) and LV filling time (P = .001) and decreased interventricular delay (P = .013) and intraventricular delay (P = .010). The optimal VV interval could not be predicted by any clinical nor echocardiographic parameter. At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of nonresponders was 10%. Optimal timing of the interventricular interval results in prolongation of the LV filling time, reduction of interventricular asynchrony, and an increase in stroke volume. In patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy, LV hemodynamics may be further improved by optimizing LV–RV delay." @default.
• W2004148522 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004148522 creator A5003217724 @default.
• W2004148522 creator A5029914776 @default.
• W2004148522 creator A5033749421 @default.
• W2004148522 creator A5035543366 @default.
• W2004148522 creator A5038774828 @default.
• W2004148522 creator A5062565030 @default.
• W2004148522 creator A5070167485 @default.
• W2004148522 creator A5071969370 @default.
• W2004148522 date "2005-10-01" @default.
• W2004148522 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2004148522 title "Tailored echocardiographic interventricular delay programming further optimizes left ventricular performance after cardiac resynchronization therapy" @default.
• W2004148522 cites W1977301303 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W1982964034 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W1993254286 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W1996913193 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2010262068 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2023989974 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2030553750 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2033857855 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2037590855 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2039506736 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2047907380 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2064286593 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2065877948 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2074831861 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2075939684 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2091884139 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2126832698 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2140652967 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2146391756 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2159318323 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2169799235 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2169887733 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2170281616 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W2567948445 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W3144470180 @default.
• W2004148522 cites W4361868645 @default.
• W2004148522 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.07.016" @default.
• W2004148522 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16188583" @default.
• W2004148522 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2004148522 type Work @default.
• W2004148522 sameAs 2004148522 @default.
• W2004148522 citedByCount "109" @default.
• W2004148522 countsByYear W20041485222012 @default.
• W2004148522 countsByYear W20041485222013 @default.
• W2004148522 countsByYear W20041485222014 @default.
• W2004148522 countsByYear W20041485222015 @default.
• W2004148522 countsByYear W20041485222016 @default.
• W2004148522 countsByYear W20041485222017 @default.
• W2004148522 countsByYear W20041485222019 @default.
• W2004148522 countsByYear W20041485222021 @default.
• W2004148522 countsByYear W20041485222022 @default.
• W2004148522 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004148522 hasAuthorship W2004148522A5003217724 @default.
• W2004148522 hasAuthorship W2004148522A5029914776 @default.
• W2004148522 hasAuthorship W2004148522A5033749421 @default.
• W2004148522 hasAuthorship W2004148522A5035543366 @default.
• W2004148522 hasAuthorship W2004148522A5038774828 @default.
• W2004148522 hasAuthorship W2004148522A5062565030 @default.
• W2004148522 hasAuthorship W2004148522A5070167485 @default.
• W2004148522 hasAuthorship W2004148522A5071969370 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C109982973 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C111773187 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C178853913 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C2775914520 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C2776034619 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C2777361368 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C2778198053 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C2779161974 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C2780346441 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C57900726 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C78085059 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C109982973 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C111773187 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C126322002 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C164705383 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C178853913 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C2775914520 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C2776034619 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C2777361368 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C2778198053 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C2779161974 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C2780346441 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C57900726 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C71924100 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C78085059 @default.
• W2004148522 hasConceptScore W2004148522C84393581 @default.
• W2004148522 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2004148522 hasLocation W20041485221 @default.
• W2004148522 hasLocation W20041485222 @default.
• W2004148522 hasOpenAccess W2004148522 @default.
• W2004148522 hasPrimaryLocation W20041485221 @default.

• next