FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004151010> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004151010 endingPage "872" @default.
• W2004151010 startingPage "833" @default.
• W2004151010 abstract "I am always amazed by newspaper reports of the way that geologists and space scientists draw complex conclusions about the origin or nature of a planet from data sent back by a probe of one tiny part of the planet's surface. They seem to have a lot of confidence in their underlying theories. The same is not true for sociolegal scholars. We don't have full-fledged theories about how legal systems actually work, and hence it seems risky to make big generalizations about a system as a whole based on a study of one or two legal institutions or processes. Making generalizations about the in action for whole legal systems is especially risky if the subject is the United States, with its 50 different state legal systems, from Mississippi to Montana to Massachusetts, and with its proliferation of different kinds of courts, law enforcement bodies, police departments, administrative tribunals, and regulatory agencies, state, federal and local. Small wonder that most empirical sociolegal scholarship is relatively narrowly focused on specific legal policy areas and processes. While these case studies are immensely valuable, occasionally it seems worthwhile to use the scholarly close-ups of particular clumps of trees to draw some wide-angle conclusions, however tentative, about the shape and dynamics of the legal forest. That, however quixotic the effort, is what I sought to do in Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law (hereinafter AL). But just as Don Quixote needed the skeptical realism of Sancho Panza, the essays on AL in this issue, paying close attention to text, empirical detail, and analytic precision, serve as a reminder of the pitfalls attending the quest for generality. Yet I am not quite willing to don the Quixote costume. In this essay I will argue that AL, even if a bit ambitious, is reasonably realistic, and that the questions raised by the other essays raise meaningful but not" @default.
• W2004151010 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004151010 creator A5049217274 @default.
• W2004151010 date "2003-07-01" @default.
• W2004151010 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2004151010 title "On Surveying the Whole Legal Forest" @default.
• W2004151010 cites W1569909864 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W1969105951 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W1975948358 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W1981834403 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W1986294897 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W1994521125 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W1998484643 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2002993277 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2006758037 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2011722232 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2027920752 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2036757529 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2044032851 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2047279975 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2075409512 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2086919819 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2088128647 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2088174630 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2099491574 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2169676157 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2258621930 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2316449431 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2319889614 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2321207525 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2326755884 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2329140719 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2330825036 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2332870034 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2795924013 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W2797057430 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W3122805641 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W4229688410 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W4233294173 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W4236132021 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W4241549138 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W4247660556 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W4250800147 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W4253823849 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W4300129202 @default.
• W2004151010 cites W86012911 @default.
• W2004151010 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2003.tb00217.x" @default.
• W2004151010 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2004151010 type Work @default.
• W2004151010 sameAs 2004151010 @default.
• W2004151010 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2004151010 countsByYear W20041510102012 @default.
• W2004151010 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004151010 hasAuthorship W2004151010A5049217274 @default.
• W2004151010 hasBestOaLocation W20041510102 @default.
• W2004151010 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2004151010 hasConcept C62649853 @default.
• W2004151010 hasConceptScore W2004151010C205649164 @default.
• W2004151010 hasConceptScore W2004151010C62649853 @default.
• W2004151010 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2004151010 hasLocation W20041510101 @default.
• W2004151010 hasLocation W20041510102 @default.
• W2004151010 hasOpenAccess W2004151010 @default.
• W2004151010 hasPrimaryLocation W20041510101 @default.
• W2004151010 hasRelatedWork W117302946 @default.
• W2004151010 hasRelatedWork W1983126463 @default.
• W2004151010 hasRelatedWork W1987967678 @default.
• W2004151010 hasRelatedWork W2059707233 @default.
• W2004151010 hasRelatedWork W2095126257 @default.
• W2004151010 hasRelatedWork W2121524756 @default.
• W2004151010 hasRelatedWork W2633218168 @default.
• W2004151010 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2004151010 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2004151010 hasRelatedWork W782553550 @default.
• W2004151010 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W2004151010 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2004151010 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2004151010 magId "2004151010" @default.
• W2004151010 workType "article" @default.